User login

Who's online

There are currently 9 users and 59 guests online.

Online users

  • Bert
  • Guglielmo
  • emmettoconnell
  • Laurian
  • chad360
  • SMASH
  • cupric oxide
  • The Original Yoda
  • Chia

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • ktcoxster
  • making a differ...
  • johnmac
  • circular_ruins
  • monkilo

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Rick on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 12:22pm.

I find that a few of the OlyBlog regulars continue to make comparisons that are particularly outrageous. It appears to happen whenever someone makes a statement about holding the current administration accountable for their actions. It goes something like this: "But CLINTON did it TOO!" This is the worse kind of reasoning, and so far from appropriate that it is kind of a sad commentary that we even have to address it now. But, here we go.

The thing that gets me is that all they achieve is to muddy the issue when we have a President who ACTUALLY deserves to be impeached. Actions have consequences, and Bush's actions have hurt our country in innumerable ways. The other guy? He got a blow job. These two are not the same, and to continue to maintain that they are is to continue to allow the current administration to damage the country. Read that last part again: If you continue to make this specious argument, you provide cover for people who are presently hurting this country. There is no other interpretation. If, because of partisanship and spite, you continue to make this argument, you are a false patriot, someone who claims love of country only as a political ploy, but isn't actually protecting our democracy.

»

More

I've tried to appeal to your patriotic sensibilities above, but it is actually much worse if you happen to care about human life in general, not just American lives. If one maintains that a lie is a lie is a lie, this amounts to a not-so-subtle bit of racism. It requires that one believes that lying about a blow job is equal to lying about WMD to invade a country. In the first case, no one got killed. In the second case, hundreds of thousands have been killed. To believe that these are the same, morally, is to believe that deaths don't matter if they're Iraqi deaths. The fact is, some lies ARE less moral than other lies. The bottom line: you don't help yourself by just saying: "Hey, they both lied." There is a moral obligation to talk about the consequences of those lies.


When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
»

Apathy is the only enemy..

Apathy is the only enemy..
»

Right on, Rick.

And if I may add one thing to your argument, Clinton's sex life is none of our business, whereas a war our country is waging is and should be a matter of concern for us as citizens. I really have to wonder about these people who want to stick their nose into other people's sex lives.
»

Hillary's still married to

Hillary's still married to him. Whether it's because she still loves him, or because it's better for them politically, or because it's best for business, is beside the point. It's her decision and her call. For all we know she might get her own on the side too. It's their business.

Kenneth Starr only bothered with the Hummer Controversy after he wasted millions of dollars going nowhere on Whitewater.

Same as the military having nothing on James Yee so they tried accusing him of adultery. At least in his case it never happened.

»

Whatever helps you all sleep

Whatever helps you all sleep at night.
»

Whiskey and Barbiturates

Whiskey and Barbiturates work for me.

»

Obviously my moral thermometer isn't registering a fever

maybe it's broken. I haven't needed anything to sleep lately.
»

I miss the good ol' days

I miss the good ol' days between the ages of 15 and 24 when I needed only 3 to 4 hours of sleep a night.
»

Just fyi

that wasn't a shot at you Merwyn. I just got the proverbial kick in the shin underneath the table =D

15-24? 10, 11, 12 hours of sleep for me. Heck I slept until 11am this last weekend.

»

I didn't take it as a shot.

I didn't take it as a shot. (Would that be a shot of Makers, or a shot from a .44?)
»

Hmmmm

Last weekend it was a shot of

»

Speaking of moral thermometers

 The last time I knew, the moral implications of consentual sex versus the moral implications of lives lost - both via lying - was rather easy to calculate.

Now let's let each issue stand on its own merit.  Clinton lied to protect his family from the humiliation of his wrongdoings.  Why did Bush lie?

"There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

I'm afraid your audience

I'm afraid your audience doesn't know the answer.

»

This is what happens when

This is what happens when the law sticks their nose into two people having consentual sex. At least when one or both of them are black in Georgia.

»

What lie?

So which lie are you talking about AL.   

“One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles.” —Sun Tzu

»

Pick the one that suits you best.

 I think if you google "Bush lies" you'll come up with quite a selection.

"There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

I think you need to pick one AL

I just looked at bushlies.com.  Much of what they think is a smoking gun of a lie, I don't see it.  Certainly not at the level of flat out lying under oath for God and everyone to see.

 

An example.  bushlies.com suggest that GWB lied when he said the US isn't torturing people.  Bushlies.com states that waterboarding, sleep deprivation, noise exposure, heat and cold exposure are torture.  I don't believe it meets the definition of torture, "any act by which causes severe pain or suffering, physical or mental".  Also their explaination of waterboarding is incorrect, so I question their credibility, as what they describe is simulated drowning not waterboarding. 

 

Further what the interrogators apply for "torture" is less than our own soldiers go through in their SERE training.  Small bones can be broken, i.e. fingers and toes, some cutting, and yes "waterboarding" to name just a few.

 

So, back to the question, "what is the lie of your choice"???

 

So you pick your best lie by GWB, and we can go from there. 

“One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles.” —Sun Tzu

»

Gee.....there's not much I can say....

 Tell me when you're ready for my waterboarding experiment.  I always wanted to see what someone would do when waterboarded - you know....seeing that it's not torture and all that....

I think you are convinced that George Bush is an upstanding guy.  Enjoy!

"There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

Ok,

so you don't have a lie you believe is equal to or worse than Clinton's perjury.  I would agree with you that GWB's lies, don't meet that level.

 

I'm not a huge fan of GWB.  I did vote for him, but only because the alternatives made me want to puke.  And even though GWB does stuff that really pisses me off, he was the best we had to choose from.  

 

“One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles.” —Sun Tzu

»

Don't mistake my post

When I saw you mincing words over lies (whose lie is the worst lie) I realized that this was a similar conversation to a religionist trying to prove the existence of God(s) to an atheist.  Thus I folded my hand.

"The alternatives made you want to puke" - hmmm....John Kerry, longtime Senator, war hero (at least so says his opposition) made you want to puke.  Instead you voted for a fortunate son that got preferential treatment to avoid combat duty, whose best poliltical experience was his last name and a governorship.

Interesting.

"There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

Kerry,

war hero, thats a laugh. 

“One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles.” —Sun Tzu

»

You'd better check your sources

 John Kerry served his country honorably as a war hero - George W. Bush

Now...maybe this is where Bush is a liar?

You make the choice

"There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

Clinton lied to save face

He lied under oath, and then tried to excuse his lie by saying a blowjob isn't "sexual relations". Call it whatever makes you folks happy, but he committed a crime. A crime that would have gotten ANY other public official fired.

I wouldn't consider his fiasco to be worse than anything bush has done, but you can't convince me that he wasn't doing something wrong (and knew it), that it wasn't EVERYONE's business (commander in chief, think scrutiny) and that he didn't lie, under oath, to his own people.

»

Remember, it depends on your

Remember, it depends on your definition of the word "is".

»

Nothing like a copula to

Nothing like a copula to confuse a president
»

People in Iraq are dying, Norm

Does it really matter what Clinton told himself to justify his lie? You're still equivocating.


When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
»

Rick

People are dying all over the world for different reasons. Some of them are good, some are not. If we stopped the world and freaked out everytime and wrong death happend the world would stop spinning.

Yes, it matters to me. It always will. If this bothers you, might I suggest you slowly wind yourself back in the other direction so that your panties will stop getting so twisted?

»

YikesCome on, we all have

Yikes

Come on, we all have been able to go at it without pot shots before. Maybe we all need to blow some things up and get it out of our systems.

Can't do it in Lacey, but irony of ironies you can do it at the Lacey Community Center because it's not within Lacey city limits (according to Ken Balsley of KGY)

»

It's not all the same.

We're responsible for the deaths that are happening right now. It's not like this is some abstraction. There are people alive right now who will be dead tomorrow because every time someone tried to hold Bush accountable, someone like you said "What about Clinton?"


When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
»

Right

So I should spend every moment of my waking day trying to impeach the president? Or?

Rick if you are trying to convince me to be a tofu-eating, non-showering, deoderant-abstaining, hippy protester who likes to get arrested, you are barking up the wrong tree.

If this consumes you so much maybe you should go to Iraq and spread this message among the military. I'm sure you'd be welcomed with open arms across the board over there. Of course you could just stick with the panty suggestion I gave you.

»

That deserves a response...

From the tofu monster!

 

 

(Note, I couldn't decide whether to post the tofu-monster or the panty-monster... but I figured the latter might get a little controversial, and my image-posting record could use some improving as of late.) 

 

 

The Canaanite's Call

»

As much as I gripe

I did have a little bit of tofu last night at lemon grass

...shhhhh don't tell Olycop

»

Everybody's business?

Why in the world is the president's blowjob everybody's business?
»

Right, Monica was an intern

Right, Monica was an intern doing her thing willingly. She wasn't a paid prostitute. It didn't cost the taxpayers a dime.

»

Public figure

He was in the oval office, getting a BJ from an underling.

If I'm a nurse-manager at the nursing home and I have one of the nurses assistants giving me a BJ in my office, am I alright then?

If I'm a cop and I get one of the dispatchers to give me a BJ in my squad car, is that ok?

He was the president Janet. It's our business because he is working for US. He used his office as an oral sex shack. Considering the intern was even there he was probably on company (ours) time. Again, as stated numerous times, I wouldn't care but he LIED about it under oath. Because he felt that a BJ isn't really sex.

So what do you think Janet: He got a BJ from an intern (right off the bat this would get most people fired) in his office (another fireable offense where I work) and then lied about it, not only to the american public, but under oath (not sure if that part is fireable, but it can cause a prison term). Is that right? If this were your boss what would you think if your coworker brought this up to you? Do YOU consider a BJ to be a sexual act? I don't really want to know about his sex life but he brought this on himself. I'm sure he probably wasn't getting any action from his wife, but this is not the way to fix that.

»

He worked from home. His

He worked from home. His office was just down the hall from his bedroom. If it had been Hillary on her knees Starr and the Republicans would still have tried to nail him for something.

»

Reasonable point

 Sex with a subordinate is wrong, wrong, wrong, Norm.  I have to agree with you.  Therefore Newt Gingrich, one of the prime Clinton attackers, should have been fired for his activity with his aide, that he eventually left his wife for.

I'm sure the list is longer than just Newt and Bill. How many firings should there be?

 "There is only one race, the human race" - The Neville Brothers

»

I hope you aren't hoping I'll backpedal over Newt!

I've only bought one bumper-sticker in my entire life. I bought it for my Grandfather 11 years ago and can recite it without fail: "If we can send a man to the moon, why can't we send Newt?"
»

The backpedaling will happen,

by Rick and others here if a demo becomes prez and makes some mistakes.  Then it will be ok to remind us about GWB. 

“One who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be in danger in a hundred battles.” —Sun Tzu

»

And don't forget...

...as I mentioned on another post, that Clinton didn't just lie under oath about a fling.  He lied to defend himself in a sexual harrassment case.  I simply don't understand why people (who otherwise would consider themselves feminists) would stick up for a man who dropped his pants in front of a woman without her consent (not to mention having sex with a subordinate).

Clinton has become a red herring for use by Republicans.  This does not, however, warrant defending the guy.

 

The Canaanite's Call

»

I hope I don't seem like I'm sticking up for Clinton

I was very disappointed in many of his policy decisions. However, I think the scrutiny of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky was inappropriate and an invasion not only of his privacy, but of Monica Lewinsky's, as well. She didn't file a complaint; a "friend" ratted her out for political reasons. I don't really consider Monica Lewinsky a victim of Bill Clinton -- in fact the Starr report made it seem that she was the initiator -- but she was certainly victimized by the media scrutiny of her sex life, her hair, her clothes, her weight, her mental state, her personal history, etc.

To be a feminist, must one appoint oneself the bedroom police, and investigate every act of male sexual malfeasance, regardless of the feelings of the woman involved? I hope not.

»

Lewinsky didn't file the

Lewinsky didn't file the lawsuit; Paula Jones sued Clinton for sexual harrassment.  She accused him of propositioning her and dropping his pants and exposing his genitals at her.

Jones' attorneys, in an attempt to portray Clinton's character, questioned him on the stand about his sexual affairs.  In a sexual harrassment suit, I consider it fair game to question the accused on such matters.  It was while on the stand in this lawsuit that Clinton lied about his affair with Lewinsky. 

 

The Canaanite's Call

»

Thanks Phil

that said it well
»

Is it fair game?

Jones' lawsuit was dismissed; is there anyone alive who thinks Jones' suit was anything other than a political maneuver? Is it really fair game to scrutinize someone's sex life in such a manner? What if someone decided there were political points to be scored by examining YOUR sex life? How much would you be willing to tell Doug Mah?
»

You're talking about a

You're talking about a sitting President vs. a mayoral race for a city of 50,000 people.  They don't compare well.  Bush, or any President, has a team of press folks with him everywhere he goes, including vacation.

I don't believe it should be public information through any type of required disclosure but if it comes out, it's fair game.

»

Thanks for straightening that up!

I thought Meta was running for President! Silly me. Thanks for explaining how principles of privacy of political figures are contingent on the scale of the governed area.
»

Do you deny this is how it

Do you deny this is how it works?
»

"This is how it works"?

Your question is just a little vague.
»

In this thread

things a little vague could be taken the wrong way. A sexual act of some kind even....depending on your definition of "some".
»

heh!

Do I really have to explain "how it works"?
»

Don't personalize so much, Norm

Really, asking me whether I consider a blowjob a sexual act is not relevant. All I said was that the president's sex life is not our concern. If there were a pattern of coerced sex and harassment and the woman complained, that would be a different matter -- not because it involved sex, but because it involved an abuse of power. That wasn't what happened in the Clinton/Lewinsky case.
»

Ok, so throw all of that out

And forget the personal crap. He lied under oath. Our president lied under oath.

He was a slime-bucket. I liked listening to him speak, but apparently a few women did too.

»

I'm not really trying to defend Clinton here

I don't like him too much, based on his policies. What I'm saying is that I think people should mind their own business when it comes to the sex lives of other people, even politicians. To paraphrase Michael Frante, we should be worried about who they're screwing in public, not who they're screwing in private.
»

Agreed. It was wrong, an

Agreed. It was wrong, an abuse of power, sexual harrassment, lied about and impeached for. Now, back to Rick's question: How should we, as the employers of President George W. Bush, hold him accountable for the lies he has told us?

p.s.--maybe we should start a "Clinton" thread and a "Bush" thread, just to keep them distinct. I think they could both use a little distinction! 

»

Question?

The only question I saw in Rick's original post was, "The other guy?"

It seemed like more of an accusational statement to me.

»

Agreed!

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Latest Classified Ads

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter