Michael Dresdner writes:
Wayzgoose print by Chandler O'Leary and Jessica SpringRachael Dotson’s untitled graphic works fill one set of windows with figures dressed in blue with their heads in the clouds. They are nicely drawn and, to me, reminiscent of Andy Warhol’s early graphic work. Plus, and this is sort of critical: Dotson’s windows represent pretty much the only true installation in the building. There’s a critical difference between an installation and an exhibition. An exhibition may fill a space nicely (as does, for instance a four-by-six foot painting over a couch), but the emphasis is on the individual work or works of art and not on the way in which they work together to form a whole, which relates thematically or visually to the space. The Wayzgoose prints are an exhibition, not an installation. Selections from Wayzgoose fill large parts of the windows and are
Dragons by Beth Johnson. Photo by Heather Joydefinitely worthy of careful scrutiny. Wayzgoose is one of Tacoma’s most popular art festivals, a printmaking and book arts showcase named after a medieval guild celebration. This installation showcases giant linoleum prints produced by steamroller during the ninth annual Wayzgoose. Featured are prints by: Stadium High School Printmaking, Maggie Roberts, Audra Laymon, Beautiful Angle, Chris Sharp, CLAW, Ric Matthies, Chandler O’Leary & Jessica Spring, Charles Wright Academy Printmaking, Pacific Lutheran University Printmaking.
Rachael Dotson, untitled. Photo by Heather JoyAlso fun and funky are Beth Johnson’s papier mache dragons. They are large and humorously scary. Her “Red Dragon” won Best of Show in the 2011 National Arts Program exhibit. Seen in the Woolworth Windows, it a long-snouted dragon head mounted like a taxidermy trophy.[Woolworth Windows] Broadway at 11th and Commerce, through August.
Samantha Chandler and Keith Eisner as Mary and John Brown
drawing by Paul CadmusStories with photos of bare breasted women on protest marches in Manhattan have been going around the Internet lately. The half-naked women were claiming their right to go topless. The story on policymic.com carried a picture of an attractive redhead with a lovely figure, breasts exposed. It was not an erotic picture. It was a joyful picture. There were also videos posted with more bare breasted women on the streets of New York surrounded by hoards of happy people, most with their cellphone cameras flashing. The topless women were nice looking. In different contexts or poses they would probably be considered sexy, but there was nothing sexually stimulating about those video images. They seemed to me wholesome, healthy and joyful, but certainly not dirty.
Le Sommeil by Gustav CourbetI remember when I was about 20 years old and as horny as any 20-year-old could be, and I somehow came into possession of a nudist magazine filled with photos of naked men, women and children of all shapes and sizes. Those photos were interesting but not arousing. It makes me wonder if our society would not have a much healthier attitude toward sex if nudity were commonly accepted. Taken out of sexual context, bodies are just bodies; we all have them.
Odalesque, acrylic on canvas by Alec Clayton 1985There is a dearth of male nudes in art history. Other than Cadmus and some contemporary gay erotica, most of which I’ve seen is of little artistic merit, there is Thomas Eakins, and then you have to go back to Rodin and all the way back to Michelangelo’s David and beyond that to Greek statuary to find beautiful male nudes. One thing that strikes me as I contemplate these things is that with few exceptions the artworks which to me are erotic are not realistic. Gauguin’s figures have a blocky, primitive look, Modigliani’s figures are simplified and flattened, with very little realistic detail, Cadmus’s paintings have a cartoon-like character, and his drawings and those by Rodin are loose and expressively drawn with more attention to the line quality than to the depiction of the figure. So what is the difference? I think it might rest with what I said in the previous sentence: upon what does the artist focus — the art or the figure? If the focus is on the art — line, color, value, shape, texture — the humanity of the subject comes across as real; but when the focus is on the body the subject(s) of the art become objectified, which makes it more pornographic than artistic and not really sexy, or certainly not in a healthy way. Rodin’s drawings are an excellent example. He did some explicitly sexual drawings in which the figure is obviously objectified, but they are not the more erotically stimulating of his works. His more erotic works are the drawings of figures dancing or in other natural poses with lyrical contour lines playing off against washes of color or gray tones and without the intentional attention to sexual parts.I’m meditating on these things now because of the stories about the New York protests and because this summer I am scheduled to show and discuss a film that deals with the subject. The film is called Open Studio. It was a class project my wife did as a film student at The Evergreen State College in 1988. At the time I was making art that dealt with sexual subject matter, not necessarily erotic art, although some of it could have been seen that way, but art that commented on our society’s attitudes toward nudity and sex. For the filming we hung a large selection of my paintings on the wall and invited a group of TESC students to look at them and discuss them with me.
Hospital Update(From L to R Michael Cooper, Jeremy Thompson, Martin J. Mackenzie, Mark Peterson, Jefri Peters, Rachel Fitzgerald, Russ Coffey). Photo by Galen Wicks PhotographyIt was Saturday night of the opening weekend of The Laramie Project at Tacoma Little Theatre. We thought we must have arrived too early because there was only one other person in the lobby who was not theater staff. By the time the play started more had trickled in, but it looked like little more than a fourth of the seats were filled. If they had been doing The Sound of Music or a Neil Simon comedy the house would have been sold out.
Aaron McKinney's Confession(From L to R Jeremy Thompson, Russ Coffey, Michael Cooper). Photo by Galen Wicks PhotographyIn 1998 on a cold October night 21-year-old gay college student Matthew Shepard was brutally beaten, tied to a fence and left for dead on the outskirts of Laramie, Wyo. He was found 18 hours later and rushed to the hospital, where he died five days later. The case was a media frenzy. Five weeks after Matthew Shepard’s death, Moisés Kaufman and members of the Tectonic Theater Project of New York City went to Laramie, where in the course of the next year they conducted more than 200 interviews with people of the town. They wrote the play using the actual words of the interviewees, including people who knew Matthew Shepard and even his killers, Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson. A cast of nine actors play the roles of more than 20 Laramie residents, Kaufman and members of the acting company, with staging reminiscent of Thornton Wilder’s Our Town — but unlike Our Town, this is not fiction. This is naked truth.
EpilogueThe cast of THE LARAMIE PROJECT. Photo by Galen Wicks PhotographyIt is beautifully directed and has a mood setting sparse set designed by Lex Gernon with spot on lighting by Niclas R. Olson. The use of overhead television monitors in the scenes where the media was swarming the town was extremely effective (reminding me of a similar use of monitors in TLT’s Frost/Nixon, which Yost also directed).The ensemble cast works in such harmony that it would be wrong to single out any one actor. They are each superb. They are: Jen Aylsworth, Russ Coffey, Mike Cooper, Rachel Fitzgerald, Marty MacKenzie, Jefri Peters, Mark Peterson, Tiffani Pike, and Jeremy Thompson, each playing multiple roles.What is truly amazing is the manner in which these actors change from character to character, often in a manner of seconds with no more than a simple costume change — sometimes in full view of the audience — more often than not consisting of a simple change of hats or a different shirt or jacket thrown over the black T-shirts they all wear, and then a radical change of voice, from the twang of a cowboy to the sophisticated tone of a college professor. As one of the audience members pointed out in the great talk-back after the show, method actors may live in character on and off stage for months at a time, yet these actors do the same thing while cycling through anywhere from six to ten characters each with the changes in the length of time it takes to put on a hat or walk from one part of the stage to another.I’m writing this on the day of the Tony Awards. Each of these actors deserve one of those, and Yost deserves one for directing.And you know what? This is not even a “mainstage” production; it is a “second stage” show, meaning it’s not considered mainstream enough to draw large audiences. The good thing about that is that tickets are merely $10.
"The Portland Panels: Choreographed Geometry," by Klaus Moje, 2007, kiln-formed and diamond-polished glass. {Photo courtesy of Glenn Ostergaard Glass Collection}
Rebecca Lea McCarthy as Doris and
George and Doris in 1956
1965Hirschberg began acting in 2009. He played the ghost in Hamlet at South Sound Community College and was the voice of K-Billy in Theater Artists Olympia’s Reservoir Dogs. McCarthy is a graduate of Cornish College of the Arts and has an impressive resume including work with the CBGB Improve Group in New York, but has never before acted in Olympia.Written by Bernard Slade and directed by Jim Patrick, this modern love story tells, in two acts of three scenes each, the story of George (Hirschberg) and Doris (McCarthy) a couple having an extremely long lasting affair. Strangely enough, the audience seems to readily accept their love affair as being perfectly fine, just as they’re willing to buy into the concept of a one-night-stand blossoming into a once-a-year rendezvous that starts in 1951 and goes until at least 1975. Like most of the audience for this show, as well as people who saw the 1978 film starring Alan Alda and Ellen Burstyn, I was happy to suspend disbelief in order to enjoy their escapades.Every year at the same time they meet in the same hotel room for a weekend of lovemaking. Lots of it. I don’t know when I’ve seen so much kissing and hugging on stage. There are no sex scenes, just talk about it before and after the acts with some graphic language, most notably about erections, and sometimes the lack thereof. The gist of their 24-year affair is played out in scenes that take place every four or five years, specifically 1951, ’56, ’61, ’65, ’70 and ’75, and every time they come together they have changed in response to the social and political climate of the day.Slade has written in some brilliantly repetitive bits such as at each rendezvous George and Doris take turns telling each other something good and something bad about their spouses, and each time they come together one or the other is conflicted due to guilt — but never enough to break off the affair.It is a sophisticated sex comedy with a good helping of soul searching, love and conflict.It is well directed and well-acted with nostalgic music and video projections of the various times periods smoothing over the transitions between scenes as Hirschberg and McCarthy cycle through a delightful parade of period costumes, including wigs for Doris who frequently changes her hair style and color. Audience members who lived through those time periods will enjoy the costuming by Allison Gerst and Carol Baque. I thoroughly enjoyed the give-and-take between George and Doris, and I’m pleased to see a couple of promising newcomers to South Sound stages.

Scott C. Brown and Brittni ThoresonThe taut drama Two Rooms presented by Confrontational Theater Project at Eclectic Theater in Seattle has a very limited run – only through this Monday, June 3. Directed by Beau M.K. Prichard, it features Scott C. Brown, Brittni Thoreson, Taryn Pearce and Julia Nardin. It is a drama of political intrigue and personal conflict and anguish that is a perfect vehicle for a tiny fringe space the likes of Eclectic Theater, a black box space in the middle of Capital Hill that seats about 25 patrons.
I enjoyed visiting the student art show at Tacoma Community College.
Cinderella’s (Ingrid Pharris Goebel) coach arrives to take her to the ball. Photo by David Nowitz.
The favored son, Prince Randolph, (Xander Layden) can't imagine anyone finer than himself. Photo by Dinea DePhoto.The story is about Cinderella’s next door neighbor, Edna, who, like Ella, is a maid. But there’s a big difference between the two young women surviving degrading servitude and poverty. While Ella (Ingrid Goebel) is a self-pitying whiner who cries a lot and dreams that someday her prince will come, Edna (Carolyn Willems-Van Dijk) is a go-getter, an entrepreneur who bakes and sells casseroles and revels in telling jokes that are as silly as they are funny. And there is more than one prince, oh yeah. Prince Randolph (Xander Layden) is the most narcissistic character since Narcissus himself. He prances and preens and spends a whole lot of time looking at his most gorgeous reflection in the mirror. Prince Rupert (Harrison Fry) is the misfit in the royal family. He runs a recycling business, wears clothes pieced together from recycled materials and loves puns. And he may be the only person in the kingdom who thinks Edna’s jokes are funny.
Now matter how hard Cinder Edna's (Carolyn Fry) stepsisters (Meghan Goodman and Priscilla Zal) try, they just can't seem to make her life miserable. Photo by Dinea DePhoto.Everyone knows what happens when Ella goes to the ball. What’s not quite so well known is that Edna also goes to the ball, and she meets and falls in love with Prince Rupert.
Cinder Edna (Carolyn Fry) and Prince Rupert (Harrison Fry) discover a true happy ending doesn't require uncomfortable footwear. Photo by Dinea DePhoto. Goebel and Willems-Van Dijk turn in outstanding performances as Ella and Edna. They’re both good comic actors and both sing well — and nobody cries like Goebel. Fry and Layden each make their characters absurdly believable.
"Reversal of Fortune" by Ric Hall is not wall fodder.Many of the pastels in The Northwest Pastel Society Invitational, which I recently reviewed for the Weekly Volcano, were wall fodder. They were skillfully done and most were attractive, but they were the visual equivalent of cotton candy or bubblegum music. When artists do this kind of work and galleries show it, they promote mediocrity. So why do they do it? Do they believe that a sweet little landscape that is essentially no different than millions of other sweet little landscapes is as artistically worthy as, for instance, a Picasso or a Rembrandt? Probably not, but it is likely that the gallery owners, like their customers, enjoy the sweet little landscapes. They’re comfortable with them. Furthermore, they surely know that such art will sell more readily than, say, an abstract painting by a little-known regional painter. Back to the pastel show, I noticed a lot of red dots indicating paintings that were sold. I also noticed that the listed prices were two-to four-times those of paintings of comparable size by artists of considerable regional repute seen in other area galleries. So maybe it’s a matter of making money. God knows, if they can’t make money we all suffer a lack of art.
The Mechanics of Memory by Becky Hendrick, acrylic and alkyd on canvas; 45” x 45”Artist and writer Becky Hendrick painted a series on the Holocaust which she later wrote about in a book called Mechanics of Memory. Becky is a fine artist and a fine writer and, coincidentally, related to me. Here's the opening of her essay on the Holocaust paintings:
"Reversal of Roles," pastel by Ric Hall The Northwest Pastel Society's 27th Annual International Open Exhibition at American Art Company features works from 58 artists from across the United States and Canada. Almost half the gallery is taken up with nice little landscapes that are amazingly similar to one another, and about a quarter of the gallery is filled with portraits and other figurative works that are also a lot alike, but not as much so as the landscapes. There is one nude by Paul Barton of Olympia that is nice in that the figure is not idealized and there is some dramatic play of light and dark. There are a couple of Pop/photo-realist images by Kari Tirrell of Gig Harbor that are technically amazing. Tirrell’s “Train Wreck” is the juror’s pick for Best in Show. There’s a painting of race horses by Joe Mac Kechnie that looks like a Leroy Neiman sports illustration (Director’s Award); one purely abstract painting by Barbara Noonan of Seattle that is atmospheric and nicely executed; and a clever painting by Cinda Sue Dow of Friday Harbor of two zebras standing in the middle of a landscape that is an amalgamation of van Gogh’s “Starry Night” and “Wheat Fields” (without the crows).
Front: Jesse Smith, back: DuWayne Andrews, Jr., Zack Wheeler,
Meg McLynn. Photo by Michele Smith LewisMeg McLynn starred in Purple Phoenix Productions Patsy Cline tribute and Tommy and the English Panto Pinocchio. She does a knockout “Angel in the Morning” that segues into Janice Joplin’s “Piece of My Heart,” and her rendition of Jefferson Airplane’s “White Rabbit,” complete with psychedelic lighting is one of the highest of highlights in a show filled with highlights.Rather than doing the songs chronologically, they are grouped by theme and style, with a “chemical sequence” (recalling the ‘60s drug culture), boy-group and girl-group medleys, and songs of war and peace. The five-piece band led by David Duvall is outstanding as always, and Duvall’s arrangements are masterful, especially on some of the chemical sequence numbers and the Beatles medley and a rendition of John Lennon’s “Imagine” that’s unlike any I’ve ever heard.
Bailey Boyd (center); from left: Megan Tudor, Jen Ropella, Erin Snodgrass, Kristin Burch, Alessa Daniel, Jesika Westbrook, Samantha Eagle – photo by Dennis Kurtz At Harvard Elle transforms herself into an exemplary student with the help of — again, highly unlikely but it’s a musical — a divorced hairdresser named Paulette (Stephanie Nace), an imaginary Greek chorus cheering squad from her old sorority, and a nerdy but nice law teaching assistant named Emmett Forrest (Pauls Macs). Emmett is a character we’ve seen in countless romantic comedies, the nice guy who falls in love with the heroine.
Bailey Boyd, Pauls Mac – photo by Dennis Kurtz If this were a serious show Nace’s Paulette would provide the comic relief. Maybe she’s the comedy in the comedy. I’ve seen her in many roles at Capital Playhouse, and she always throws herself wholeheartedly into every role she plays. She plays Paulette as gutsy and streetwise, but also vulnerable.
from left: Joey Fechtel as Stumpy, Anna Richardson as Lexi and D. Nail as Latham. Photo courtesy Harlequin Productions
standing: D. Nail as Latham, on floor: Tom Dewey as Bummy. Photo courtesy Harlequin ProductionsLatham seems contented in his working-class status. He is the most deeply layered character in the play. He has an amazing knowledge of everyone in town, their pasts and their relationships to one another. He is alternately sassy and gruff and menacing, has a mysterious past, and nobody is comfortable with him and nobody knows how to deal with him.
My admiration for Lisa Sweet is growing. I was impressed with the pieces she had in the recent “Finish” show at The Evergreen State College and even more impressed with her work in the current show at Childhood’s End Gallery.