User login

Who's online

There are currently 11 users and 69 guests online.

Online users

  • jlw
  • Ehver Green
  • Guglielmo
  • Peter Alden Stroble
  • Jododp
  • emmettoconnell
  • oldtimeydave
  • Rob Richards
  • tctvjohn
  • epjmcginley

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • Jododp
  • Jfodfie
  • GregDiablo
  • doffsey
  • Brett M

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Crenshaw Sepulveda on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 11:33pm.
I'm going into Batdorf and Bronson's today and in the front window I see this sign. "Please, no smoking, no loitering".  Ok, I understand the business about no smoking, seems that the voters passed a law regarding smoking in any public places, including 25 feet from a door or open window.  I don't like it but it does make sense.

This business about no loitering is what bothers me.  Maybe I'm all wrong about this, but is not a coffee shop a place where one buys a cup of coffee or so and, well, basically loiters.  OK, you got a cup of coffee in your hand, a laptop or newspaper in the other you are pretty much loitering.  I know that people will say that they mean loitering on the sidewalk.  So now Batdorf and Bronson controls the sidewalk?  They own the sidewalk?  They have a problem with you taking your coffee outside the shop and drinking it in front?  i'm not getting this and it worries me.  What has become of Batdorf and Bronson's?  Olympians chased the neo-Nazis away from the Capitol Campus.  What are we going to do about these Street Nazis that pose as a coffee shop?

I'm also noticing they have yet another sign stating the restrooms are for customers only.  God forbid you loiter in the restrooms, what next?
»
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 8:18pm.
Here's an article from the Washington Bureau of McClatchy Newspapers. McClatchy owns the Olympian. So maybe we'll see this article in tomorrow's paper.

Here's an excerpt and a link:

By Drew Brown
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Liam Madden opposed the war in Iraq even before he deployed with his Marine unit in late 2004. But he came home convinced more than ever that the war was wrong.

"The more informed I got, the more I opposed the war," said Madden, 22, a Marine Corps sergeant in Quantico, Va. "The more people who died there, the longer we stayed there, the more I opposed the war. The more I know, the easier it is to support withdrawal."

Madden is one of about 118 members of the U.S. military who plan to petition Congress asking that U.S. forces be withdrawn from Iraq and brought home, said attorney J.E. McNeil. McNeil is advising the grassroots group of active-duty service members, who organized the petition drive through a Web site (www.appealforredress.org).

...

The message that Madden and other troops are sending to their congressional representatives is brief and to the point.

"As a patriotic American proud to serve the nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to support the prompt withdrawal of all American military forces and bases from Iraq," it says. "Staying in Iraq will not work and is not worth the price. It is time for U.S. troops to come home."

...

The Military Whistleblower Protection Act of 1995 allows servicemen and women to communicate grievances directly to Congress without the threat of penalty or reprisal.

...

Here's a link: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/15839367.htm

»
Submitted by stevenl on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 5:45pm.
I'm having a definition problem. Can anyone out there tell me the difference between a "Total Asshole" vs. a "Complete Asshole"? This thought recently crossed my mind. Perhaps the proximity of election season has something to do with it.

»
Submitted by Rob Richards on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 2:40pm.
NJ top court rules that gay couples have same marriage rights as heterosexual couples under the state constitution

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday October 25, 2006

Gay couples have the same marriage rights as heterosexual couples under the New Jersey state constitution, New Jersey's state Supreme Court ruled today.

The Court stopped short of fully approving same-sex marriage but gave lawmakers six months to act. The legislature must grant either civil unions or marriage rights to same-sex couples.

The majority opinion states "that denying the rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution."

"To comply with the equal protection guarantee of Article I, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, the State must provide to committed same-sex couples, on equal terms, the full 65 rights and benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples," the ruling said.

"The State can fulfill that constitutional requirement in one of two ways," the ruling continued. "It can either amend the marriage statutes to include same-sex couples or enact a parallel statutory structure by another name, in which same-sex couples would not only enjoy the rights and benefits, but also bear the burdens and obligations of civil marriage."

"If the State proceeds with a parallel scheme, it cannot make entry into a same-sex civil union any more difficult than it is for heterosexual couples to enter the state of marriage," the ruling continued. "It may, however, regulate that scheme similarly to marriage and, for instance, restrict civil unions based on age and consanguinity and prohibit polygamous relationships."

A pdf file of the Court's 90 page opinion can be read at this link.

»
Submitted by tctvjohn on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 10:04am.

Thurston County Commissioner & Assessor

Thurston County P.U.D. & Superior Court

Thurston County Sheriff & Coroner

»
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 9:56am.

CNN: Lou Dobbs: "Border fence will leave Texas-size hole"

Constructing the border fence certainly is a good beginning to our efforts to control our borders, but let's be honest about the legislation: It isn't nearly enough, and far more must be done.

We do know that the government of Mexico encourages its poorest citizens to cross our border, to live and work in the United States. And we know that illegal aliens are sending back to Mexico more than $20 billion in remittances per year, according to the Bank of Mexico. Those remittances from Mexican citizens living in the United States are one of the largest sources of foreign income for the nation of Mexico, neck and neck with oil revenue.

Because the federal government refuses to enforce immigration laws, cities and towns all over the country are being forced to take on the illegal immigration crisis. Escondido, California, became the latest city with the courage to pass an ordinance prohibiting landlords from renting to illegal aliens.

This is a big reason why a Buchanan-esque minority party would, in my opinion, gain a lot of support in the southern United States and why I feel our troops in Iraq should be put on the southern US border (and putting all border patrol agents on the nothern border).

When a foreign leader is encouraging his citizens to flood a neighboring country, it is nothing short of an informal invasion.

»
Submitted by Sarah on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 7:03am.
Now that I have attention, from over here in the safety of my blog, I'd like to use it as if I just stood up and yelled that phrase in a crowded room of almost entirely men.

See, there is something about some men (and some women) talking about abortion that just about sends me through the roof. The closest I can identify, the closest I can get to words is to ask -Where are the women?-.

I understand this isn't entirely fair because I cannot even force myself to dive into the current thread in question. I know myself, I know what pisses me off, I know where frustration lies.

So, even if it is a lovely conversation for all, I myself can't go there. From a distance I can offer suggestions. If you find yourself on a soap box, get off it. Be reminded that there are other experiences and perspectives than your own. Remember the women and listen. Really listen.
»
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 10/25/2006 - 6:53am.


As tctvjohn sez: "This is just the intro, the rest of the video voters guide can be viewed at www.tctv.net. There are 14 clips in all. Everyone in a contested race was invited to participate." Some are also posted here.

»

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Latest Classified Ads

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter