|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 11 users and 61 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by sky.cosby on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 11:43pm.
A discussion of "Revolutionary Parenting" by bell hooks
» From Feminist Theory From Margin To Center, bell hooks, Boston: South End Press, 1984. Date Reading Was Discussed: September 7, 1993 Present: Catherine C., Renée D., Jaime B., Colleen M., Mary Ellen B., Stephanie R., and Cathleen M. I'm lifting this whole thing 'cause it's pretty sweet. But you should still check out the site I found it on: Eve Online: Ecofeminist Visions Emerging. Here's the direct link to the original post. Drawing on her experience growing up in a working class African American environment, bell hooks finds collective parenting to be a radical alternative for raising children. Although none of the women at this month's session are mothers, we were by and large receptive to approaches that circumvent the nuclear family socialization process. As a microcosm of patriarchy, it serves as the primary training ground for hierarchical, authoritarian values. Long before the nuclear family's arrival, communal childcare for thousands of centuries was a fundamental element of human society. Throughout much of the world today, kin as well as kith continue to share parental responsibilities, as exemplified by the African saying, "It takes an entire village to raise a child." One woman, however, argued that it is unrealistic to expect extended parenting to work in an industrialized world. The maw of capitalism has eviscerated community and family bonds. A lot of people no longer live with or near their families, neighbors are often strangers, and friends too busy to impose upon. Childcare centers are clearly necessary, even though too many of them commodify the rearing of children. hooks advocates more small, affordable, public, tax-funded centers. In keeping with an ecofeminist ethic of inter-connectedness, community-based childcare centers have the potential to strengthen fragmented community ties.
Submitted by Starwing on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 11:12pm.
The Olympian article was fairly accurate.
»
Submitted by UnkemptTide on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 10:18pm.
This morning Rob Richards received word from the press that the police are mobilizing 40 armed bullies to come down and end Last night at the city counsel meeting the city acknowledged the failure of the county and regional programs to help poor people find homes and jobs, as well as the failure of housing vouchers that are supposed to help people rent but are not accepted anywhere. Folks on the counsel (with the exception of TJ) stated that since they had not heard about the tent city, that because no one had approached them about it, and because it was clearly in violation of the law, Camp Quixote would be put to an end. But where are the greater violations happening? Why do people not have a place to stay in the first place? Why does the United States not view housing as a human right? And why would the city counsel sooner wash its hands of responsibility than support actions to create safer and healthier places for people in need of a bed to stay?
Submitted by chad360 on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 8:45pm.
Laura Ware is on the City of Olympia City Council, she is Mayor Pro-Tem.
» Her dialog is great on the video for: City of Olympia City Council Meeting Agendas for the Week of February 6, 2007, 7:00 p.m She talks about the grapevine and the blogs! I think this rocks!-- Her point is well taken, but > darn < ain't that a funny video! Cheers! OK, so most of y'all know I'm not into the Comcast Cable TV deal, so I'm on a media diet.
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 12:45pm.
Of course the following is tongue-in-cheek but think about this: Olympia would be a safer place to shop and take the kids if only the city council would grow a backbone and make the police get rid of all the churches! I can't stand turning on my tv and seeing some charlatan preacher beg me for money! Why don't these Padres get a job? If you don't give them what they demand they insult and abuse you, something about being with Satan and burning in Hell. These people choose to live a church lifestyle. Nobody made them. Oh, sure, their family life and upbringing may have led them to it but they need to take responsibility for themselves. Need I mention the large number of pedophiles? Maybe there are some pastors who clearly aren't sex offenders but one is one too many. Have you ever smelled these church people? Around that disgusting St. Michaels church it smells like incense. Being serious now I love churches and I was raised Catholic. A few months ago I emailed St. Michaels mentioning that I was thinking of going back after years of going to different churches. I didn't receive any emails or phone calls. No "welcome to our Parish", no request for a meeting to maybe see if spiritualy this was the right decision. What I have gotten, every month on the dot, are envelopes in the mail so I can send them money. Classy. Back to pointing out all the "obvious" reasons churches and the people who support them need to be driven out of town, most of them are involved with soup kitchens, clothing banks, and other charitable means of assisting the downtrodden.
Submitted by Sarah on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 12:28pm.
This post is all my own individual opinion and experience, I'm not speaking for anyone else or any group.
» I spent a little time this morning talking with folks at Camp Quixote, the tent city downtown. I want to thank them for their gracious welcome, smiles, courtesy, and dedication to helping create healthy community. Also for informing me right away that by stepping on the property I'd increased my chances of being cited or arrested. I came away with a lot to think on and a Poor People's Union button and membership. I encourage everyone to keep up with the news here through OlyBlog and also to go talk with people at the camp. My initial questions to the City:
Submitted by Sarah on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 12:14pm.
I was walking along the sidewalk downtown a few yards from the tent city. I'd just left the tent city and was mulling over the friendly conversations I'd had with residents.
» My mulling was interupted by my intuition, I tuned in and lifted my head, meeting the gaze of a man driving past me. Guy probably in his 60s or so, driving an insecure male truck, glaring at me as if I was the most despicable vermin around. He slow cruised by with his hate on while I tried to figure out what his problem was. Oh. I'd just come from the tent city and this man wanted to make certain that he'd make me feel like sh*t. He did not succeed. But here is the best part. What did he have dangling from his tailgate? A rubber pair of male genitalia. Yep, he's got balls.
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 10:54am.
From email:
» Poor Peoples Union (PPU)
Submitted by Phil Owen on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 10:24am.
The City continued its justifications for turning its back on the poor at the Council meeting last night. Mayor Foutch talked at length about the growth in services in the last twenty years. Laura Ware talked about the City's offer to allocate $200,000 to services this year. The City Manager talked about his notion that homelessness is a regional and national issue, and that the tent city had picked the wrong target.
» Let's get a few things straight: 1. Tent city residents are not asking for money for new services. In fact, the City is clearly not connecting the dots between the $200,000 it has offered for services and the fact that Tent City residents ARE asking for a service review committee to ensure that service agencies treat their clients with basic dignity and respect. 2. Tent city residents are not asking the city to fund new housing projects. They ARE asking for the opportunity to be self-reliant as a community... an opportunity that will not be found in government funded housing projects. 3. Tent city residents are not asking the city to lobby the Federal or State governments for relief. They ARE demanding to be included in our community, to be visible, and to have the right to exist. Laura Ware particularly failed to understand the nature of the conflict in our city. She claimed that the opposition to the new sidewalk law and the request for a permanent location are two separate issues. Yet they truly are one and the same. Tent city residents are demanding the opportunity to exist in peace, to have at least a few spare moments in the day when their lives are not subject to the whims and prejudices of the social service system and the police. Until recently, the sidewalks served as THE ONLY place where that was possible. Now that this opportunity has been taken away, the tent city residents are taking direct action to uphold their basic right to dignity. Residents of the tent city will likely be arrested today for refusing to disperse. Please come downtown to offer them your support and your witness.
Submitted by Summerisle on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 9:08am.
I don't agree with the last frame's characterization of Boston, but the whole thing is very funny nonetheless. |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|