|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 9 users and 66 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Norm on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 10:41pm.
ALERT: Possible spoilers ahead! If you have not read The Da Vinci Code please go out and read it! If anyone would like to borrow a copy, let me know I have one that I am more than happy to loan out. Warning: My belief system is very odd. Anything I express herein is not necessarily the way I believe, it may be thrown out there simply for conversation....and it could change tomorrow ;) So, as I'm sure a few of you are aware of, I spent time in Europe this last month. I enjoyed myself and it was a wonderful trip, but I really would not want to live there. While I was on vacation I read two of my favorite novels, The Da Vinci Code, and Angels and Demons . Both of these take place in various parts of Europe and include a few of the cities I visited. My main intrigue with these novels is my questioning of the Catholic church. When I was in middle school I was reprimanded for refusing to agree with a teacher about Dinosaurs being a conspiracy theory put in the ground by scientists. I won't go to deeply into the plot, but toward the end it is revealed that Jesus was in fact (this is a novel btw, fiction) married to Mary Magdelane. Not only were they married, but Jesus intended Mary to be the head of the church. Some of the disciples, not fond of this idea, intend to not let this fall to her. Instead it falls to Peter (or he took it, depends on your imagination) and thus Peter became "The Rock" from which the Catholic church is/was built. ie St. Peters Basillica, Vatican City as history dictates he was crucified upside down in rome. As stated in the book, Constantine held the Council of Nicaea and (I can't find specifics for this part) decided which holidays to celebrate and when to celebrate them. This converted Roman empire to it's first official religion. Within the book (remember, fiction) it is explained that in order for Christian holidays to be celebrated on the same day as Pagan ones it was decided that Jesus would have to be divine. Apparently, up until this point he was regarded simply as a mortal, and a prophet. Someone to build a church after, but not the son of God. Married to Mary Magdelane, AND had a child with her. The author continues by saying that Rome, the center of Catholicism/Christianity, went on a smear campaign and turned Mary Magdalene into a whore. In the process they decided to smear women in general, hence women not being allowed to be priests.....or much of anything important....until recently. They were considered only to be important as far as being a good wife, having children, keeping the house running, etc. Essentially the book has an incredible cascade of women's importance being wiped out due to Christianity. That before this time men and women were considered opposite sides of the coin, different but equally important. Women were bringers of life, Mother Earth, etc. With all of this info in mind, I came home and did a little bit of reading myself, specifically looking for the Gospel of Mary (it's disputed as to who "Mary" is in this) and I found some links and found some interesting quotes,
Sounds a lil jealous, no? The deeper I dug, the more I got to thinking, "Why the hell couldn't this be true?" None of us were alive when the bible was written. The bible was, afterall, written by man, we are not infallable. I urge all of you to go out and read the book, I've had many great discussions with people about it and it's always interesting to get other point of views. Here are some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Christianity http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/why/legitimization.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mary_Magdalene http://www.gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament_apocrypha and a site showing that some Christians hate this book, and any discussion it may push http://www.thetruthaboutdavinci.com/ These are just a few, there's lots of other stuff out there. Have fun with it
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Thanks Norm..
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 11:22pm.I was raised Catholic too. By an Italian grandma no less. None of it ever sunk in though, and I became an atheist in my early teens..
Im kinda ignorant when it comes to religion, and it makes me feel bad to rant about it sometimes because I know, and am related to, so many wonderful Catholics*.
(*on the east coast many of them are unstable, but i still love them..)
I'm down...
Submitted by chad360 on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 12:32pm.As an every Sunday Catholic
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 1:50pm.Anyway, one good point about the ancillary Gospels is that the four Gospel of the Catholic bible (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) deal in universal terms, that the faith is something for everyone and that it is fully revealed in them. The other books (especially the recent Book of Judas) paint the faith and Jesus' relationships with his apostles as having different levels. The book of Judas clearly points out that Judas had a special relationship with Jesus, and that the faith wasn't necessarily open to everyone.
We do believe that the faith is open to everyone. There are tons of inconsistencies here, of course, the most of which have to do with the power structure of the church, women in the priesthood, and the historic Latin language mass.
Back to Brown: If people want to pay attention to what he's writing, we should use it as chance to talk to people about the faith, not try to tear him down, because he does have some good points, especially about women and how the church is portrayed.
Wooo!
Submitted by Norm on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 2:36pm.Emmett, you are a superstar!
If you don't mind answering in a public forum, which church do you attend?
St Mikes
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 2:41pm.I spent a good portion of my
Submitted by Norm on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 3:19pm.