|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 55 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by POLDF on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 12:58pm.
[The following is an article I wrote for the upcoming Works In Progress. It will be out Friday.]
The Trials of the Oly22 On August 20th, the first Stryker brigade soldier died in Iraq. Sgt. DeRoo was previously stationed at Fort Lewis and possibly he, his brigade and their equipment and passed through Olympia during the last weeks of May this year. He or just his fellow brigade members and their equipment was greeted by hundreds of demonstrators during this time as an 11-day protest of the Port of Olympia occurred in an attempt to stop war shipments bound for Iraq that resulted in 37 arrests. Demonstrators brought to the attention of the Port of Olympia officials, the wider community and eventually the world, their perspective that the war in Iraq is illegal and the Olympia community and the Port of Olympia should not be complicit in and profiting off the war crimes of a continued presence there. If the port officials had listened, Sgt. DeRoo may still be alive, and many more to come including Iraqis need not die. The Army contracted with the Port of Olympia for the first time in nearly two decades and began transporting war equipment including 300 Stryker vehicles in mid-May. The United States Naval Ship Pomeroy came into the Port on the evening of Memorial Day to deliver the equipment to Iraq. This issue prompted a continual protest presence at the Port and daily corner demonstrations and street marches. During the first week of direct actions, 14 were arrested by the Olympia Police on Marine Drive for ‘pedestrian interference’ as unfair consideration was given by them to the military convoy’s access to the roads over those of community members by inappropriately rerouting and escorting the convoy through local access roads and arresting pedestrians. None of those cited and arrested have been charged with that crime from the city’s prosecutor’s office. If the prosecutor believes that the police acted in bad faith, in a biased manner or illegally, they often do not pursue charges against the arrested and hope to let the issue go away. The police know this too -- that it is not always about getting the criminal -- but they still take particular action to achieve a short-term political goal. In this case, clearly deciding that one group’s interests are more important than another’s and removing any barriers to that interest. It has also come to light that the OPD has made the decision to destroy their videos from the time, which may have been illegal. One activist during this time, Drew Hendricks, was arrested and originally prosecuted by the county with a felony trespassing charge. How exactly does a citizen trespass on public property, like the Port? How is a constitutionally-protected demonstration against a government agency, like the Port, considered criminal? When the prosecution could not make the case stick before a judge, it was dropped to a misdemeanor charge which will eventually be dismissed with a one-year deferred sentence and a fine of less than $50 for court costs that Hendricks took. The next week with the imminent arrival of the USNS Pomeroy hundreds of community activists took the protest to the Port gates. There they were confronted by many jurisdictions of police who used disproportionately violent responses (pepper spray, unnecessary and excessive force, withholding of medical care, and mass arrests) against the non-violent protestors. Demonstrators held a teach-in led by International Politics and Middle East Professor, Steve Niva; had a public party; and staged a die-in as the USNS Pomeroy left the port. The police used flawed and slanted political logic by demanding that demonstrators remove a base-camp from a parking lot because “it would attract homelessness.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
The trash issue...
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 1:10pm.In fact, the Nazis did leave lots of trash all over Olympia. In counterpoint, I believe that the protesters stated that much of the trash that they are accused of leaving was already there before the protests began.
I'm going to guess that
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 1:24pm.I'm going to guess that $50,000 wasn't spent by the Washington State Patrol wasn't spent to make sure eight people didn't get rowdy.
I'm going to take a stab in the dark and assume they were brought in for the counter-protesting.
DING DING DING DING
Submitted by Norm on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 1:27pm.Fair enough Rick, I don't
Submitted by NWarty on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 1:35pm.Fair enough Rick, I don't know how much trash was left by the NSM.
But going back to the other post, the fact remains that a section of fence was destroyed by anti-war protestors. Were those in the pictures on the Olympian's Photo Gallery the ones arrested and being charged? I can't say. Property was torn up, laws broken and those arrested will have their day in court.
I don't think claiming it's an "Illegal War" to justify the case against them is going to do a lick of good and in my opinion, just plain foolish. It's as if defending slashing SUV tires because you think gas-guzzling, tank-of-an-automobiles are wrong for the environment.
Agreed
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 1:47pm.As I've stated before, I think that the "tear it down" theme was not a good approach. However, it is absolutely clear that the action was a protest, and any speech associated with it protected.
I'm not sure if you were there when the fence came down. It was comical how easy it was. (I think even the protesters were surprised.) Basically, a chain-link gate was taken off its hinges, and set aside. It was not "destroyed" in any sense of the word that I am familiar with. However, it does cause one to wonder about where all the money for port security under this administration has gone.
OR
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 12:37pm.Litter?
Submitted by jlw on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 2:15pm.Yes, it's really too bad
Submitted by Norm on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 2:44pm.I am so disgusted with this
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 8:01pm.The whole world is watching us. We owe it to the world community to take action against the war criminals in our midst.
George Bush, Dick Cheney, et al. must be brought to justice.
Janet,FYI, I am a soldier
Submitted by NWarty on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 2:24pm.Janet,
FYI, I am a soldier and that is my old Brigade. So yes, I do care. I care about those guys AND the town I live in.
The claim is rediculous...
Submitted by armywife on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 4:08pm.As for the expenses on the city.. I hope both the Nazis and the Protesters have to pay it back their damages are equal in my mind.
One last thought... those men in the Stryker Brigade who have died... died feeling unsupported by the protesters... those who stood outside their vehicles and equipment knocking down fences and such. They deserve respect and they didnt get it... I hope you can leave them out of further posts... unless you plan to recognize their lives in a positive light. I am really frustrated with the people who thought they could stop a deployment because you cant and you wont... Though the soldiers may be apprehensive and scared... normal feelings for one going into a war area... They are tough... caring people and they will and ARE doing good work.. even if the protesters stood there... the soldiers ignored you hurtful comments...
I keep coming back to this blog because they need to be supported and have their voice heard... You dont have to support the war... just support the soldiers...
A hurt.. angry... loving ... supportive ... army WIFE
I'm sorry that you are
Submitted by OperaGirl on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 4:36pm.Thank you
Submitted by armywife on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 7:41pm.No.
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 12:50pm.Of course ...
Submitted by armywife on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 2:46pm.What do you think the protest was about?
Submitted by jlw on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 5:59pm.I know what it is about...
Submitted by armywife on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 7:32pm.Listen no one wants this war to end more than I do... it is my husband who is there... it is my family that it hurting... it is our life that continues on praying everyday that the next time the door bell rings it isnt a KIA or a WIA notification... Think about it!
We hope...
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 8:39pm.Thank you....
Submitted by armywife on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 9:06pm.Support
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 9:11pm.The Army provides...
Submitted by armywife on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 9:20pm.The army will not call and offer me support though.. I have to seek it out on my own. The services available are discussed at meetings and well advertised...
Is there anything...
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 10:05pm.Indeed!
Submitted by Phil Owen on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 8:44am.Thank you for the offer!!
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 4:48pm.I think army wife is being a little emotionally manipulative
Submitted by jlw on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 10:03pm.I do hope you consider arguing without the appeal to emotions. You do not make me feel guilty when you tell me how much you're hurting. It's not my fault; I've done what I can to end this war.
None of Our Faults...
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 6:13am.Who is paying the price? American Soldiers and their families, and of course the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's who have suffered casualty as a result of the invasion/occupation - and their families too.
War is Hell
Submitted by Sarah on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 9:25am.If I am talking with someone who expresses that they are in a lot of emotional pain, ultimately that is what has to be addressed first. Seperate from the issues being debated.
When someone tells me that they are in emotional pain, if I stay engaged in the conversation, eventually I'm going to say something like "I hear you, is there anything I can do to help?".
I'm not causing the pain. Debating issues, including this current war, doesn't cause pain, I'm not attacking anyone, I'm not denying anyone's anything.
Also, by focusing on one issue, I am by no means saying that other issues and feelings do not exist.
After awhile, if every time I try to talk about one thing, and the person I am interacting with keeps telling me that they hurt, I pretty much take that to mean that the conversation is ended. The focus is then on how we are feeling.
So, ideally there would be a way for folks to talk with each other, with a focus. We can talk about our feelings concerning loved ones serving in the military. We can also talk about whether this current war is just.
Stopping me or anyone else from talking about this war won't erase the fact that War is Hell.
I agree
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 5:08pm.That is not my intent...
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 5:06pm.I also want to point out that my life isnt "chewed up" I communicate with my husband as often as time permits... I am a successful early two something woman who has completed 2 BA degrees.. as well as a Masters in Education. I have a full time job... friends... family.. and enjoy working out. My life isnt easy... and can be very difficult. I use my Strength to make every day successful. I also know that if i sat home and wallowed in my own pity that it wouldnt help my husband.
Furthermore, your statement "For instance, your fear about your husband's safety doesn't mean there's any truth to the statement that he's helping keep a poverty stricken country safe." is really disrespectful. Every day... EVERY day my husband is working with the local people in his neighborhood that he patrols to help meet their needs. He is helping the people create jobs, safe streets, and clean up there neighborhoods. Much of what he is doing is something that was there prior to the start of this war. They are thankful for the clothing, shoes, toys, and much more that are given to them.
My goal is not to make you feel guilty... but to make you realize that the manner in which you protests has a significant effect on the soldiers and families... That make up a huge percentage of this area. In fact I was informed the other day... that Fort Lewis is the largest provider for jobs in the State. Interesting...
PLease realize your comment "I do hope you consider arguing without the appeal to emotions. You do not make me feel guilty when you tell me how much you're hurting. It's not my fault; I've done what I can to end this war. " I am fully aware that people have tried to stop this war... however after hearing from my husband actual accounts of what is occuring and happening when leave an area... I fear for the people in Iraq if they were to be left alone. I more than anyone on this blog want this War to end.. and to see the soldiers...ALL OF THEM come home... but it isnt time... I am a firm believer in letting things go to the hands of God. Maybe I might seem like all mighty but... this war is out of our hands... Bush has some control... but not all of it....
I challenge you to protest without emotion... it isnt possible... nor is it possible for me to discuss the challenges of an army wife without emotion.
I actually find her comments
Submitted by Norm on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 5:25pm.Well, that's predicatable, Norm
Submitted by jlw on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 5:41pm.I understand more about death and war than most
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 6:15pm.Thank You....
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 6:18pm.It's about attitude and behaviors.
Submitted by Phil Owen on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 8:36am.I agree with you on this one, armywife. There are protesters out there, entire movements in fact, that are a great deal more respectful in their approach. Ground Zero folks frequently commit civil disobedience at naval bases. Typically, they pray and chant as they approach the gate to the base, go silent and light candles as they cross the line, and kneel down inside the base. They are friendly with the officers who arrest them, with the sailors who witness, and with the jail guards. A couple friends of mine with Ground Zero have said that they've actually developed friendships with their jail guards. In my eyes, their is no better way to undermine an unjust system than to befriend and be kind to the people inside that system. This goes beyond the notion that "they're just doing their jobs".
I think the Port protest would have been a lot more effective, and a lot less inflamatory, had everyone just silently laid down in the road. They would have accomplished their goals without getting gassed, and may well have earned the respect of the police officers and soldiers who were there.
I frankly have been part of the activist scene in Olympia long enough to begin questioning the motivations of a lot of people here. I think there is a lot of attention-getting behavior and unneccesarily aggressive, oppositional behavior. These behaviors are NOT radical, they're just inappropriate and counterproductive.
For more on this, see my post "Responsibility and Nonviolence" on my blog.
For the record...
Submitted by Meta Hogan on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 12:02pm.You said correct....
Submitted by armywife on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 5:15pm.I completely agree with this statement "I frankly have been part of the activist scene in Olympia long enough to begin questioning the motivations of a lot of people here. I think there is a lot of attention-getting behavior and unneccesarily aggressive, oppositional behavior. These behaviors are NOT radical, they're just inappropriate and counterproductive." I feel that other people have different agendas if you well that they are trying to express.
I want people to understand that protesting in a respectful manner of all people especially those that are putting their lives at harms way... should be treated with sensitivity. The protest in OLY at the Port really made the protesters look terrible. I said that at the time of the protest. In fact that was they day I found this blog. I believe Sarah posted it. There is certainly a more educated, responsible, respectful way to protest. In fact I have even done it on other issues. No one needed to be arrested or pepper sprayed... it was taken too far by the protesters..
Protest
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 6:50am.A friend of mine was respectful, dignified, and intelligent as he initiated conversations with various soldiers in their vehicles. As a vet himself, he spoke from experience.
I understand that there is a wide range of opinions on how protests should be conducted. And most of us will tend to have our favorite styles. I personally really believe that there is room for all of us.
Laying silently in the road is one protest style and I've done it myself on occasion. But I don't see it as a guarantee that the folks doing so won't get pepper sprayed, or dragged roughly, or otherwise harmed.
What I think of as effective may not be what someone else sees as effective.
I believe we can give each other more room. What may be a walk in the park for me might be radically life transforming for someone else, and vice versa.
Also, there are so many conversations going on. It is not just us and them.
I agree.
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 2:38pm.Aldo Leopold: "We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."
Wrong!
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 12:57pm.Your husband is part of an occupying army in a country which was as rich as ours 20 years ago, a First World country where people had public education, an industrial economy, and wealth beyond the measure of 99% of human history. A country which is today impoverished ONLY because of the actions of this country's elites and this country's army. Now you claim he's there to help them. BULLSHIT.
You, ma'am, are not playing with a rational undertsanding of history. You are playing with a vain hope that someone sold you, preying on the very real love you have for your husband. I wish you would see that, but love blinds and it is likely that you will not.
I am not blind
Submitted by armywife on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 2:49pm.Balderdash
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 12:48pm.You don't hear us saying "support the murderer, support the rapist, but not the murder and not the rape." Because it sounds damn silly. So when you plead that we support your husband, who swore to uphold our Constitution rather than violate it by supporting an illegal war, we have to ask: are you kidding?
We'll support your husband when he does his duty, which is to resist this illegal war and the regime which pushed us into it. Just as we support all war resisters, whether they resist for this reason or that. Not just the conscientious objectors, but Ehren Watada as well (who offered to fight in Afghanistan instead) - and not just Ehren, but Suzanne Swift as well, who left without permission so she could escape sexual harrassment.
If we want change, we have to support those doing the work. Your husband is not doing that work of resistance - he's building empire.
Is that what you want to support?
EDIT: I'm changing this. I
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 1:54pm.EDIT: I'm changing this. I have nothing nice to say to you Drew, so I choose not to say it, you can probably guess though. Have a wonderful weekend.
Thanks for not pouring oil...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 2:19pm.Tricky stuff
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 2:49pm.Sometimes what I write out makes perfect sense to me, I "hear" it in my mind as said in my own tone of voice, with a particular expression and meaning. But then later when I reread it I can see that it could "sound" entirely different to someone else.
So perhaps some of us can keep this as a foundation agreement. Most of us feel passionate about our position and world view, especially when it comes to this war. And it is probably much easier to misunderstand than understand each other. There probably is a way we can each individually take good care of ourselves amidst heated conversation, not bash each other personally, while also having room to make observations. Plus always knowing that walking away and cooling out a bit is an option.
I think I agree with Drew on this.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 5:36pm.I don't support the troops. I support the troops coming home.
Please don't use the word
Submitted by Phil Owen on Sat, 09/02/2006 - 1:03pm.But I'll not stand for anyone verbally bashing the men and women who follow orders and ship off. In their world perception, they are fulfilling their civic duty and trying to do the right thing. I grew up around soldiers, and I've yet to hear a single one say, "Yep, I re-enlisted last week so that I could fight for US imperialism."
The fact is, Drew, that not everyone views the world in the same way you do, and you would do well to show a little circumspection before spouting off at the wife of a man who believes that he is fighting for freedom.
In all seriousness Phil, be
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 09/02/2006 - 1:14pm.Hey!
Submitted by Meta Hogan on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 12:28pm.Good post Phil, very good
Submitted by NWarty on Sat, 09/02/2006 - 2:23pm.Good post Phil, very good post.