|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 2 users and 23 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 3:28pm.
According to news stories (and Verint’s own website) these camera systems also wirelessly transmit the imagery to anyone with the knowledge and tools to make a wireless connection to the bus’ WiFi system, located above the driver’s head: “In the event of a security incident, Nextiva Transit will allow supervisor and police vehicles to view live video from within the bus, enabling more effective actionable intelligence and emergency response.” 1 “Verint Systems Inc., a leading provider of analytic software-based solutions for workforce-enterprise optimisation and security, announced an agreement with Motorola, Inc. (NYSE:MOT) to enable the use of Verint Nextiva™ Wireless devices on MOTOMESH broadband wireless networks. (…) By deploying Nextiva wireless video management solutions on a Motorola mesh network, private security, law enforcement and emergency response personnel have immediate, high speed access to security video and data delivering heightened situational awareness to enable a more effective response.” 2
When I was logging camera installations in the post-uprising weeks I noticed only 3 of the 30 buses seen on the Evergreen routes were NOT ones with camera systems installed. Prior to the uprising, it was rare for the buses on the 41 / 48 routes to have cameras installed. It is not known at this time whether this intelligence “take” has proved useful to the Sheriff’s Department, but one can imagine others who would find its data quite useful. I've already begun to exploit this data pool by requesting bus video and audio from IT Bus #808, which in November 2007 was used to move Olympia Police into the Port of Olympia. Their conversations were quite telling... 1) http://www.sourcesecurity.com/markets/transportation/profile/2/co-1753-ga.141.html 2) http://www.intrusiondetection-info.org/cctvsurveillace/ver2.htm
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Olyblogger of the Month: Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are: Rob RichardsInterests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism. emmettoconnell Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum. enpen Interests: OlyBlog calendar, Oly street art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff. Robert Whitlock Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment Rick Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons. Docent email list Latest Classified Ads Books & Collections ›Blog Local |
And the problem here is???
Submitted by Laurian on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:12pm.There is absolutely no expectation of privacy on a public bus. If you are planning on doing some crime perhaps using public transportation is a poor choice.
The cameras were installed at the suggestion of the union that represents drivers because it was felt the cameras would be a deterrent to verbal and the occasional physical assault of drivers and passengers. I for one support the right for drivers and passengers to be free of violence while going about their business. I also don't mind bullies and thugs be punished when they victimize someone. Unlike the subjective testimony of eyewitnesses, cameras can more or less objectively create a record what happened.
That said, I oppose video surveillance of common public areas like streets and parks. I feel recording what happens in the close confines of a bus is different than reco rding what happens on the streets. While I believe while there may not be an expectation of privacy there is some expectation on anonymity on a public street. I do admit this may be a distinction without a difference. If so, I readily admit I my argument may be confused if not contradictory.
We simply disagree - but I hadn't critiqued the system.
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 9:04pm.First, cameras are no more objective than the person evaluating their content. Evidence? The controversies over Rodney King's videotaped beating...
Second, the fact that I can see you on the bus is quite different from me being able to see you "on the bus" every time you get on or off, and note where (and precisely when) you get on and off the bus. For a detective who needs to find you, knowing your commute habits is a prime piece of data. And hearing your end of a cellular call, or a conversation with another rider on the bus? No warrant needed, but quite useful...
Third, the company which sells this system (Verint) also sells the tools to "data mine" the images, so watching hours of it at a time is simply not needed. Yes, camera systems such as this can be head-ends for "total information awareness" style automated facial recognition. Intercity Transit certainly won't use it for that purpose, but someone with access to the Wifi aspects of it could easily download the data at will, possibly remotely if they set up a local system in the area of the Transit Centers or the Bus Yard. What they do with it is up to them.
Fourth, Verint's board of directors includes several figures with NSA and intelligence backgrounds, including Directors of NSA. It's for all practical purposes an intelligence arm or business front for the DOD / White House. (See www.olywip.org/site/page/issue/2007/07.html for more details) You might not worry about that kind of thing, but then you probably don't know much of the history of political repression in the United States and Europe - or I would guess you would...
Fifth, I already use this system to Copwatch, so I'm hardly 100% against it. I just wish it was installed in their patrol cars. OPD cars have no video systems - although I heard they looked into TASERs with cameras in them. These cameras I support. Using cameras to ride herd on the poor, I do NOT support.
Sixth, you have NO expectation of privacy in your own automobile, either. So when are you going to contact Verint and have them install one of these so we can see whether and when you are going from point "A" to point "B"? I'm sure your insurance carrier would like to have an objective view of that accident you claimed... not implying anything about anyone in particular, just noting that the argument you use is easily used to step into your own life.
Ahh
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 9:51pm.But there is privacy within one's automobile. While anything you do that is visible to public view is, well public the laws regarding search and seizure are still in play with an automobile. Some states also treat the automobile as an extension of one's house.
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."Right On!
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:25pm.Installing these camera's convinces me it's once again safe to ride the buses around town. I used to ride them to & from the mall to SPSCC 5 years ago and there were some scary people on the bus!
Drew, believe it or not, some of us think this is a great idea!
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
Those who wish to etch some
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:49pm.No expectation of privacy in public places
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:57pm.And that includes busses. I'm not crazy about the camera's and never buy the "it's for your own safety BS" I take responsibility for my safety. However since there is no privacy expectation in public there isn't much that can be done.
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."Err...
Submitted by Just another voice on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 6:32pm.But I am Just Another Voice
Feeling Safer
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 12:53am.The problem for me is the potential for abuse and spying on innocent, good and upstanding citizens within the community.
I see a potential to harass anti-war activists.
Besides, it's creepy to have a camera pointed at me with the possibility that there is an anonymous person at the other end secretly watching.
I would be fine with the cameras if they didn't have the remote access/ real time monitoring. That's creepy and invasive. I think it also violates constitutional laws related to search and seizure.
Aldo Leopold: "We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."
Thanks Drew
Submitted by stevenl on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 6:22am.Nice informative report that took some work to compile. All of it was news to me.
They are all over
Submitted by Just another voice on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 8:43am.But I am Just Another Voice
I object to them on principle
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 12:30pm.But then again I do things that are legal that others object to in principle. Balances things out a bit... I would like it if the cameras couldn't be remotely monitored live. The safety bit pisses me off too. "Those who would trade liberty for safety and security deserve neither"
Don't use safety as a reason to sell me on monitoring.
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."If no one watches, why spend so much money?
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 04/04/2008 - 12:06am.As for the ubiquity of analog tape cameras, yes - you're right that they are everywhere and - when someone wishes to spend the time and effort - they are useful. But the cost of access is high and the payoff is fuzzy at best. You see this in major cases like 9-11, and robberies, but not for casual political surveillance.
These cameras, by contrast, are digital. Their subjects (us) are found in controlled lighting, and at fixed focal lengths. As head-ends for facial images, these cameras can't be beat outside the Dept of Licensing or School registration. Especially if they are keyed with position data (GPS) from cellphone monitoring, as Six mentions further down the post. Match the general location of a given cell phone, once it becomes of interest*, with images of everyone who was in the bus at that position, during that time. Repeat this for the last ten times these conditions happened. The person in common to each image is the image you put on your wanted poster / ATL order. Or stop at the checkpoint, or on the highway. They don't even have to own the phone in their own name, you can still find them. Doing this from distributed analog tape is simply not cost effective. This system produces digital images sorted by date / time and already tagged to the existing bus location data from GPS. This is vastly better at facilitating this depth of programmed analysis. So what seems the same, superficially, is really very different.
*Say, from a cellular number intercepted during a call or found in an organizer's datebook.
CALEA (The law which makes the phone companies build backdoors into their phone systems for Law Enforcement) already mandates that GPS data be made available with the routing information for the call. This is a simple "national security letter" administrative request and not even a warrant (anymore). The contents of the call don't even have to be intercepted.
On the one hand...
Submitted by epersonae on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 12:31pm.It is part of the overall increasing creepiness of modern society. On the other hand, LA public buses had cameras when I was in high school, more than 15 years ago. So part of me just shrugs. (Also, I scoff at questions of Olympia bus safety, after spending 4 years riding the bus in late 80s - early 90s So Cal.)
On the third hand (?!), if this (surveillance society) is something you're interested in/concerned about, I highly recommend the works of Bruce Schneier. Probably the smartest thinker about security issues around. Plus a pretty good writer.
And on the fourth hand :) -- the navigation/announcement system is entirely HAWESOME.
Hmmm...
Submitted by Peneleka on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 1:00pm.There is an article
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 6:39pm.In today's Olympian about RFID blocking technology. Basically foil.
I don't carry anything that is RFID but my cell phone is on me...
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."Drew
Submitted by Laurian on Fri, 04/04/2008 - 4:34pm.I just re-read your original article and the comments and I gotta say I got more pissed off as I read .
You pretend to do some hyperlocal journalistic reportage about the video cameras on IT buses your piece indulges in wild speculations, justification of a paranoid view of power and politics locally and at the national level, and even indulge in erroneous speculations over my knowledge of history and my and other Olyblog posters political motivations for our opinions. In the end you speak more to your beliefs and biases than anything else.
Relax man. We get it. You are worried about the brave new electronic frontier. I would go one further and say you seem scared shitless of it. The forces of oppression continue to refine their techniques, data mining, Vernit etc... As William Burroughs said a Paranoid is a person in full command of the facts.
Let’s review shall we?
.
these systems have likely become a prime target for detectives seeking to identify those responsible for the Evergreen Uprising.
Your speculating dude, pure and simple. The word you chose, likely, is the give away. If the TCSD is using the IT system to identify and prosecute people then say so and cite the source for this assertion rather than weasely imply such a thing are happening.
...this can be head-ends for "total information awareness" style automated facial recognition. Intercity Transit certainly won't use it for that purpose,... Again, you manage to contradict yourself when it comes to local impact. IT is trying to decrease serious anti-social criminal activity, suppress free speech, assault civil rights nor bust members of a riled up hip hop crowd. As to anyone intercepting the signal, big whoop. So your or my face appears on You Tube. I can see an up side to this. A cinema veritie TCTV program on how Olympia rides the bus.
Fifth, I already use this system to Copwatch,... So you're not against all forms of covertly recorded conversations, just the ones you don't like. i.e. The Man!!! As you go on to point out this technology can and is being used to keep tabs on the forces of oppression. In that light:
The controversies over Rodney King's videotaped beating... What controversy? The tape was incontrovertible proof that the LAPD beat the shit out of another black man. The tape brought down a bunch of storm troopers, sent Mark Furman scuttling off to a gaited community in northern Idaho and started a process identifying and correcting police violence in LA.
So when are you going to contact Verint and have them install one of these so we can see whether and when you are going from point "A" to point "B"? Huh? Now you’re getting personal. Why would I do something that you have so clearly demonstrated (sic) is stupid? Once more Drew, the cameras were installed to address the issue of assault on IT buses. I assure you I've never assaulted a bus driver or transit passenger in my car.
but then you probably don't know much of the history of political repression in the United States and Europe - or I would guess you would. F.U Drew. You don't know me nor my knowledge of the oppression of the I.W.W., the Pullman strike, the Palmer raids, the Haymarket bombings, the Weather underground, the SLA, the recent BIAW assault on ACORN, FISA... Like I need to trot out my boni fides for someone who makes really erroneous assumptions about my knowledge of history and political economy.
Interesting, and instructively defensive, reactions! Again Drew F.U.
In conclusion Drew you and I are entitled to our opinions no matter how ill reasoned, irreverent, inconsistent or inconsequential it may be. The installation of video cameras on IT buses has little to nothing to do with the New World order. A close reading of your own writing makes this apparent. If you want to write an opinion piece on the NSC, Verinit, Nextiva, data mining and the history of political oppression, do so. Just be sure to call it an opinion piece and leave the pretence of reportage journalism out of it.
As for getting snarky on me (or anyone else for that matter), please don't do it again. It’s rude and makes you look silly.