User login

Who's online

There are currently 8 users and 31 guests online.

Online users

  • The Original Yoda
  • Robert Whitlock
  • Rob Richards
  • the original ep
  • hazzardus waste
  • dr
  • Rick
  • Mary Baker Eddy

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • idResponse
  • systematist
  • itsthewater
  • tsunamizombie
  • Brooks

Poster Calendar

July

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by rosscowman on Wed, 04/23/2008 - 9:49am.

This is a transcript of a conversation I've been having with jeff about the noise ordinance, I'm posting it here because I think it will help to clarify where Jeff's position which was a little unclear to me before. -ross


hello jeff,

I had a few questions for you regarding the noise ordinance you support. I am curious what your vision of downtown olympia is, and if it is your intention to push live music out of downtown? If this is not the case how do you see the music community and this ordinance living side by side? thanks for your time. -ross


Hi Ross,

This has nothing to do with "pushing" live music out of downtown. Have you read the proposed amendment? It is considerably more liberal with regard to decibel level than Seattle's ordinance. Seattle continues to have a lively and thrving music community. My own business engages in music, sometimes quite loud, that continues after 10:00 PM, so I can assure you the music community is not in jeopardy. (We are a musical theatre venue, with fully amplified productions, including numerous rock operas.)

The city has been, for some time, attempting to bring a rich array of housing options downtown. Our first housing project is slated to break ground quite soon adjacent to Olympia Federal Savings. Over 100 units. This ordinance addresses the concerns that have been brought to us by a handful of current downtown residents, regarding their ability to live in quiet enjoyment after reasonable hours. Certainly those in the music and nighclub industry woud support similar ideals in their own neighborhoods. I would encourage you to read the proposed amendment, research what other cities have done, and see if you come to the same conclusions I have.

The council would enjoy hearing from you, as well as others, regarding concerns. Please feel free to address us at any time.

Best regards, Jeff Kingsbury


Read more...

Hi Jeff,

thank you for your quick response. I agree that folks living downtown deserve a degree of peace and quiet. My understanding of the ordinance amendment is that it would prohibit sound in excess of 60-65db (about the volume of a normal conversation) as measured from the property line of the sound source during the daytime and lower then that at night. Is this correct? I have worked as the building manager of the eagle's hall and a festival organizer for what you got fest last year. The events at the eagle's hall, what you got fest, and almost every music venue downtown all fall well within that range. I would like the chance to meet with you and the council and share some of my concerns in person. I also have some first hand knowledge of the adverse effects of similar ordinances in seattle and bellingham as well as some successful models in redmond, kirkland, and bellevue.

thanks for your time -ross


hi jeff,

I was curious if you had time to read the last message I sent you. I am unclear about the specifics of the ordinance you have proposed and would appreciate some clarification. It seems to me like expecting a city center used by thousands of people each day and each night to maintain a volume level of two people having a conversation is pretty unrealistic. 65 db? and 5-10 db quieter at night?

I can hear downtown all day from the east side neighborhood, there's planes, construction, kids at recess, the school bell, and music from the neighbors. these are all signs of a busy and healthy community. Let me know if there is a time we can get together and discuss this in person.

thanks! -ross


Hi Ross,

I've been on vacation. (I actually answered the first time from CA!) The planes, construction, kids, school bells, etc that you hear would have to register CONTINUOUSLY at 65 db for 15 minutes at a time to be in violation. AND, the sound must be measured from the location of the complainants property. So, for example at the Eagles. I have stood (many times, by the way) on the street in front of the Eagles during events...wedding receptions, battle of the bands, etc...and the sound directly adjacent to the building would NOT be in violation. (Our ordinance, is 65db at its strictest, I believe, but I'll check that to be sure) I seem to recall a neighbor a few blocks away complaining about an Eagle's event a year or so ago...that was quite loud well into the wee hours of the morning. Our police actually responded to that gentleman and concurred that it was too loud, and extended for longer than a 15 minute period. I don't recall the resolution, but there haven't been more complaints, so I'm assuming it's been resolved.

If a nightclub is BELOW residences and it's summer and all the doors and windows are open, as was the case several times last summer, then that would likely result in a violation. People who live in the downtown might reasonably have their windows open in the summer heat, just for airflow...a relatively common practice. At night, when violations would most likely occur, this would only be an issue where there are residences, or other businesses that are in operation. I know of only a handful of those. I would be happy to discuss it in person, but I'm not likely to change my mind. Reasonable level of sound bothers me not one whit...infringing on a neighbor's quiet enjoyment does.

JK


»

Thanks for posting this.

Jeff seems pretty reasonable. The Fourth Ave Tav. is obviously gonna have trouble with this.
»

venue in the Port

I'd like to see a venue situated out near the Port.

»

Yes!

Now we just need money and time!
»

Anyone have the text of the ordinance?

I wrote a polite note to the city council and Jeff responded with the same "Have you read the proposed amendment?" quote. I asked him for the text, and he hasn't provided it to me. Does anyone have the actual full text?
»

been looking

I've been keeping an eye out, but haven't seen anything yet. Might be worth poking around the Planning Commission part of the city website.
»

never mind

»

By all indications council

By all indications council member Kingsbury is certainly a reasonable person.

»

Reasonable?

I don't know about you, but when I read:

"I would be happy to discuss it in person, but I'm not likely to change my mind"

it bothers me that Mr. Kingsbury values his own opinion more than that of his constituents. I mean, aren't elected officials supposed to . . . oh, wait, this is George Bush's USA, now isn't it, where those with power or money don't really need to listen to the rest of us.

If we hadn't made a ruckus about this, I don't believe he'd even be pretending that he cares (see the earlier posting of hissyfit's discussion with him, in which he says that the council doesn't even need to listen to input on the issue because it's only and "amendment").

»

He's willing to discuss it

He's willing to discuss it in person! Maybe he will come away with a difference of opinion, but he's acknowledging that it's unlikely.

Mr. Kingsbury appears reasonable enough that - if provided a piece of evidence that was so ground-breaking he couldn't ignore it - he would reconsider his own opinion.

The statement "but I'm not likely to change my mind" is simply being upfront in that unless the person he's meeting with has something significant to offer, they'll simply agree to disagree.

Elected officials are supposed to listen to their constituents - which is what he's doing by meeting with the person - but make their own decisions based on a number of factors including the opinions of the people. This is a republic, not a democracy. We elect people to make reasonable and rational decisions for us based on our core principles. If they're not doing a good job you either remove them from office or vote them out in the next election.

»

Notably, I was at that

Notably, I was at that meeting - and I like the overall idea, but there were some big holes in the ordinance. Also, it went lower than the state standard of 70dB. 70dB at the property line seems more than reasonable, to me. The 60dB night-time limit is quite low, particularly at the property line. There was also no mention of measurement standards. Weighting changes can have a big impact on measured SPL. As a downtown resident, most of the most annoying sounds are exempted anyway - for instance, the loud commercial chillers in the adjacent alley, the buses that idle outside.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Olyblogger of the Month:

decorabilia

Sponsored by:

Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are:

Rob Richards
Interests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism.

emmettoconnell
Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum.

enpen
Interests: OlyBlog poster calendar, Olympia public art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff.

Robert Whitlock
Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment

Rick
Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons.

Get Firefox!

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter