User login

Who's online

There are currently 8 users and 33 guests online.

Online users

  • einmaleins
  • Sarah
  • stevenl
  • Laurian
  • Just another voice
  • oldtimeydave
  • Judith
  • Chia

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • shadowclad_warrior
  • Lisa P
  • GRuB
  • ktcoxster
  • making a differ...

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Rick on Sun, 07/30/2006 - 9:41pm.
Aug 12 2006 - 12:00pm

“The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.

»

As Israel’s recent attacks

As Israel’s recent attacks on Lebanon escalate

To be fair, it's not as if Hezbollah or their sympathizers have stopped operating.

I think yesterday was described as a record day for rockets to hit northern Israel.

"I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance."

»

to be fair

Israel killed 60 civilians in one bombing run the other day.

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - T.P.

»

Does the scale determine who

Does the scale determine who is "more" at fault?

What is the difference between an Israeli strike killing 60 (combating a guerilla enemy which hides among the general population) and an individual walking onto a bus with explosives?

It would appear to me Israel is doing the best they can to fight an enemy which does not want to meet on the battlefield.

"I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance."

»

"combating a guerilla enemy

"combating a guerilla enemy which hides among the general population"

I've heard this talking point from many analysts on FoxNews and from others as well. Every time I hear it used I cringe, because it's as if that one little sentence is supposed to excuse the slaughter of children and other innocents. Now, I'm not going to accuse you using it in this way, I just feel you should think about what that statement means.

If Hezbollah met Israel on the battlefield, they would be annihilated, so we should expect guerilla warfare. Israel has intelligence organizations that rival ours. They have special forces that rival ours as well. Instead of launching missiles and dropping bombs willy-nilly, killing everything in sight, they could be a lot more precise. I hope the UN comes down on Israel for this. I also hope the US will come down on them.

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - T.P.

»

On the whole, yes, I was

On the whole, yes, I was using the sentence in such a manner.

Of course Hezbollah would be annihilated if they met on the battlefield. Guerilla warfare is their only legitimate option.

Guerilla warfare, though, is dependent upon the civilian population to, at the least, be in tacit compliance with the activites being undertaken by the guerillas.

This is why when we talk about the situation, we have to realize Hezbollah has a lot of support in the region among the general population. I think it's as much their stance toward Israel as it is they're the most efficient organization when it comes to helping the local community.

Which brings me to the question I was attempting to raise: Can one distinguish between a guerilla and a civilian? Is there a difference?

Also, regarding special forces. I think a lot of people tend to overestimate the capabilities even the best (Germany, Israel, the United States, England, etc.) have available to them.

As much as I like to fantasize about Rainbow Six, I don't think real life resembles a Tom Clancy novel.

"I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance."

»

I was watching news reports

I was watching news reports from Qaida, where the 60 civilians, many of them children, were killed. The people there didn't wish death upon Israel, not a single person interviewed. One man picked a flower from a nearby tree and said "This is what we give them. We will not let them turn us into animals." This man was in the military. No one showed any support for Hezbollah whatsoever. The people realize that Hezbollah caused all of this, they believe that Israel is trying to start a massive war (perhaps to fulfill prophesy) in the region, and they feel trapped in the middle. These people that are dying en masse are NOT guerillas. They're your family, your neighbors, your friends. Yes, in answer to your question, their is most certainly a difference.

Whether or not we have the capabilities displayed in fiction novels, we have the ability to solve our problems without carpet bombing children. We'll have to find a way because the days of battlefields are over. We haven't declared war on an enemy, we've declared war on a crime, and criminals hide. It's time to reevaluate how we wage war in the modern age, don't you think?

"He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - T.P.

»

errr

"Whether or not we have the capabilities displayed in fiction novels, we have the ability to solve our problems without carpet bombing children. We'll have to find a way because the days of battlefields are over. We haven't declared war on an enemy, we've declared war on a crime, and criminals hide. It's time to reevaluate how we wage war in the modern age, don't you think?"

I think you are mistaken. We can't even solve the problems in our own country without having a war, what makes you think we can somehow show the middle east what to do? The closest thing we have to a body of people to help intervene is the UN and let's face it, when it comes to conflicts, the UN is pretty useless at stopping them. So what are we as olympians going to do about it? Stand on the street corner with our sign hoping that Israel, or even our own country, will read it and make a change? I'm thinking that the only way we'll have peace in the middle east is for the human race to die out.
»

I pose you a

I pose you a counter-question, TFI. Can you tell the difference between an Israeli settler and a guerilla? Both are armed. Both are widely supported by the civilian populace... in fact, both are effectively civilians themselves. And they both kill people.

Have you ever wondered why the Egged busses in Israel are so often the target of suicide bombers?  It's because the Egged busses (which are civilian) are the primary means for intercity transit of soldiers. A good third of the riders on any Egged bus are usually soldiers.  So... who's hiding behind civilians?
»

read up and get educated

Israel's existence is not at stake and hasn't been so for decades, if it ever was. If Israel would learn to deal with its neighbors in a non-expansionist, non-military, humane, and respectful manner, engage in full prisoner exchanges, and sincerely strive for a viable two-state solution, even those who are opposed to the idea of a state based on a particular religion could accept the state of Israel, and the question of its right to exist would scarcely arise in people's minds. But as it is, Israel still uses the issue as a justification for its behavior, as Jews all over the world use the Holocaust and conflating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, which in my opinion may have been an exaggeration. Such savagery and disregard for the people of the sovereign state of Lebanon is totally unjustifed and against Geneva convention. As for the two Israeli soldiers captured and held in Lebanon for prisoner exchange, we must keep a little history in mind. In the late 1990s, before Israel was evicted from southern Lebanon by Hezbollah, it was a common practice for Israel to abduct entirely innocent Lebanese. As a 1998 Amnesty International paper declared: "By Israel's own admission, Lebanese detainees are being held as 'bargaining chips'; they are not detained for their own actions but in exchange for Israeli soldiers missing in action or killed in Lebanon. Most have now spent 10 years in secret and isolated detention." Hopefully one day Israel will self destruct.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter