|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 12 users and 79 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by einmaleins on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:03pm.
I'm relatively new to town and have seen a good deal of graffiti and heard and read alot about the different approaches locals take on that issue. So, my question is, what is the right response in that situation: • Should I take offense, be angry that someone smeared stuff on my window, that I now need to clean-up? • Is it art and I should feel honored that someone choose my store window for their self-expression? What I did learn is that being angry and upset is usally seen as a lack of character and open-mindedness, since the place I pour my heart and money into supposally doesn't belong to me but to the people with markers and spray-cans. So, enlighten me, invite me into your worldview. Perhaps I can learn something or even better, perhaps I could get to know the person responsible for it, so I could buy him a cup of coffee.
mathias
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events |
well...
Submitted by enpen on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:10pm.I'd say you have every right to be pissed off and angry and being so has little to do with your open-mindedness and more to do with how much you value your time, space and efforts.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
I'd say somebody vandalized your establishment
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:22pm.The notion of unauthorized graffiti as art has always confused me. It is not art, it is property destruction. Of course some don't care for private property. Clean it up, and if you catch the wankers who did it, sic the cops on 'em.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
?
Submitted by enpen on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:36pm.The notion of unauthorized graffiti as art has always confused me. It is not art, it is property destruction.
Things can be both vandalism and art. There's quite a bit of "vandalism" in many modern art museum collections these days.
The police as solution is part of the problem as it only reinforces the cycle in place. I would recommend thinking outside of the box.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
If it
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:43pm.Destroys or damages private property, no matter how "artisitic" in the eyes of some viewers, it is an act that needs to be dealt with. This is usually done by identifiying the perpetrator and charging them with an unlawful act.
How would you suggest dealing with people breaking the law? The police are not the overall solution, but can lead to exacting restitution from the criminals involved.
How would you propose an end to this "cycle".
Remember, only the property owner has the right to determine if they want "art" on their building. If some splinter elements who think their "art" or "message" overrides the right of another individual it becomes an illegal act.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
hmmm
Submitted by enpen on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:54pm.How would you propose an end to this "cycle".
I've answered this a number of times on OlyBlog, please feel free find them as I don't have the time to regurgitate it again.
Remember, only the property owner has the right to determine if they want "art" on their building. If some splinter elements who think their "art" or "message" overrides the right of another individual it becomes an illegal act.
And part of being a property owner is accepting the negatives that go along with the positives. Mold grows where you don't want it to, windows break, etc., etc., etc. This is not a controllable phenomenon like your solution suggests, rather this is a wave only growing in intensity. Spending your energy fighting it instead of trying to figure out how to work with it is a quick road to burn out.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
Well
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:56pm.I for one am not the type to advocate giving in to a wave of petty crime and vandalism.
This is a sure sign of the lack of respect people in America have.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Yes Steve. It is illegal. We all know that.
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:59pm.Your right
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:07pm.We could try and get society to respect things that do not belong to them. But that would probably get shot down as "stifling to a free spirit" or some such malarky.
Or we could give in. That's always an unsightly option.
Or we could find out what drives these criminals to destroy property. I've got a few ideas. Once identified we could begin a cultural attempt to lessen their impact.
Or why the hell should we give in to these people?
I just read up on graffiti in "Recipes for Disaster" an anarchists cookbook, and it seems within certain mindsets grafitti is such a given that they only stop to consider the impact of a message, not the damage it does.
It all boils down to respect for private property, or the lack thereof.
I don't have anything else to ad to this disucssion, what are your solutions?
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
You corral yourself with a collection of dichotomies
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:19pm.And that worked out well
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:26pm.Didn't it?
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Let us not argue about the efficacy of the Crusades
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 4:03pm.A sign perhaps
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 4:20pm."I am a hardworking local businessman and your tagging costs me money I better spent elsewhwere in the community." Barring that, I'll sit ouside with my mosin nagant with fixed bayonet and chase 'em off. :-p
Try the nice please dont' f- with approach perhaps?
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Tags
Submitted by Just another voice on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:35pm.But I am Just Another Voice
Whether unautherized graffiti are art or not
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:39pm.is entirely subjective. I hope we don't get into that unending argument again. That said, as the person using and keeping up that property it is quite understandable that you would be upset about it. I don't blame you. And I don't think it says anything about your capacity for openmindedness. If the "art" is on your window, perhaps you can frame it from the inside for a few days just for fun. The humor might help mitigate the anger. Anyway, sorry you got tagged.
Tschüss
I'd pass on the emotion
Submitted by Laurian on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 2:47pm.and seek Justice. In that vein I'd send a copy of the picture above to the ODA, the PBIA and the Oly cops. Document the damage and the cost of clean-up for use in prosecuting the perp in the off chance he/she is apprehended. Other than that, I'd say move on.
The preceding is not to diminish the power of righteous anger. One of my frustrations with Olympia specifically and the larger world in general is fear of passion of which anger is a part. I grew up angry, (who hasn't) but at 45 I've got a better handle on when to use my rage and when to curb it. (No, really, I do.) I wish more people would express their rage at the injustices of the world, non-violently of course, but more over I wish those uncomfortable with passion would grow a spine.
?
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:03pm.Appropriate Response
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:12pm.Graffiti and vandalism are tough issues. What's the difference between them? Is one art and the other not? How does one define when it is art and not? It can be a fine line.
I think it's pretty clear that most people (probably to include those who did the tagging) think that defacing shop windows crosses the line.
What would be really awesome would be if you could sit down and actually meet with whomever did it, come to some understanding. That would be an interesting meeting. It would require some courage, and maybe an agreement that you wouldn't turn him/her over the police. Might be worth the effort though.
That sucks. Need any help
Submitted by OperaGirl on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 3:23pm.That sucks. Need any help window washing? I wouldn't feel bad if you feel pissed off. It doesn't mean you have a closed mind, it just means that someone violated your space and it bothers you.
Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. ~Ludwig van Beethoven
Thanks for the support.
Submitted by einmaleins on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 4:37pm.Everyone,
Thank you all so much for all your kind words, your encouragment and your support.
This is truely amazing and a great example of real community.
Yes, I already contacted the ODA and hope they will be able to clean this up as fast as the last ones.
For me, real community is priceless.
No annual dues to an organization will subsitute the emotional support and consolitation that communities of people can offer.
I wish we as downtown business wouldn't need a "green machine" to clean our street and a "graffiti removal" manager to keep us excited of creating community in this town.
This is not utopia, the more we open ourselves up and share each others lives the more we understand and embrace each other.
As I'm doing business in downtown and trying feed a growing family off of it, I'm also very much invested in this community and want to raise my family here. I want my son be able to walk to the toystore by himself and take the bike to get some ice cream.
If we all do our part, we can make this happen.
I believe!
mathias
einmaleins
I can see your rainbow from the westside
Submitted by Katherine on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 4:39pm.I just took the gold from the pot that was at the end of your ra
Submitted by w1r3d1 on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 8:35am.?
Submitted by enpen on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 9:33am.You seem to confuse my refusal to create a hard distinction between all vandalism and all art with sugar coating. Or maybe I'm confusing the fight against graffiti with the same failed strategy behind the drug war. Either way, nobody is saying this is anything other than lame for mathias.
einmaleins is kitty-corner to the bus depot. There are a lot of people from out of town stopping by a three block radius of Olympia for 30-50 minutes every day. Proximity and lack of community ties creates and maintains the target. Barring spending an amazing amount of police resources on having somebody camp out right there, the reality is that this will keep happening as long as the status quo is maintained. I firmly believe the only way to combat unwanted graffiti is to accept its place in modern society and try to figure out how to work with it.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
You raise some interesting points
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:11am.How do you work with a group of people who have shown they have no regard for property rights?
Graffiti has been around as long as Og could write "Gruk smells like mammoth butt" on the wall of the cave. It has only been recently that wall scribblings have been considered art.
You can't legalize graffiti per se, because it would trample the rights of property owners.
I am more interested in ensuring that vandalism is kept to a minimum, and the way to do that is for people to start learning respect for other people's stuff. Some of the study I've done on graffiti indicates the vandals find it morally acceptable to destroy property in the name of putting a message out.
There are free wall opportunities for people who want to make real art.
How do you reach out to a destructive culture and enforce or encourage the notion that scribbling on other people's walls and windows is wrong?
I think first you have to get the strange notion out of their heads that their "art" or "tags" are more important that the rights of the person they are subjecting it on.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Good luck with that.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:32am.There are better more inclusive solutions to these issues and they start with sitting down and having a conversation between all parties involved.
This bucket has holes
Submitted by Ehver Green on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:41am.You're comparing a legal act (owning a gun) with an illegal act (vandalism).
For what it's worth, vandalism does not equal graffiti and I highly doubt those responsible for defacing Einmaleins are interested in sitting down to work out their differences. True artists wouldn't stoop to this level.
No obligation to be inclusive when the conversation starts with a crime.
Show me
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:42am.Where it is legally protected to deface property?
I'm talking about trying to figure out why the heck some people think it is acceptable to deface property without permission? Once that is established, then how do you get those same vandals to stop doing it? If police force and public scorn isn't enough, how do you bring these people around to the strange and unusual notion that if it isn't their property don't deface it? I'm open for suggestions. What I do is carefully protected by the state constitution, state law, and the courts. What taggers do is not. Just the opposite in fact.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
You're missing my point.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:03am.Trying to convince someone that something they do or believe is morally wrong is a nearly impossible task.
I'm not talking about legality here, that's a different conversation. You want it to stop the easy way, let's put cops on every corner. The harder but more fulfilling and lasting way is to figure out who is doing it and why and what will get them to stop. Right now we don't know why they do it, and we bad mouth them and call them names. Is that supposed to get them to stop?
Then graffiti
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:10am.Will continue. I won't call these people artists, because when they use private property for their canvas it becomes a crime. They are vandals. So if vandals won't be convinced that something is morally wrong, and they already don't give a rip about the legality of their crime, then there is no hope. Do you negoiate with them? How much ground do you give up?
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
This conversation
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:19am.I give up. You win. Congratulations.
That brand of thinking is one answer to
Submitted by Guglielmo on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:40am.Somebody needs to watch No Country For Old Men
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:46am.I got through saying
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:49am.Graffitti has been around since Og started tagging Thurg's cave.
And in the case of vandalism, I would say that yes the problem with illegal graffiti is from the moral failings of others.
It's funny, someone shoots a hole in a shop window and folks scream for "gun control." Somone rattle cans a shop window, and the same political spectrum wants "understanding" for the person who violated the window. Go figger.
So if the problem with graffiti isn't through the moral failings of the people commiting the act what is the problem?
Should we blame the victim for having such an attractive blank slate?
Should we blame the evil corperations for creating an oppresive world where people feel forced to exercise their "suppresed talent"?
Should we blame the evil government for "keeping people down"?
Just who should be blame for that problem?
And I think the "good old days" sucked just as bad. There was still crime, it was socially accetpable for a man to beat his partner and children, racism was tolerated and even enforced with unconstitutional laws, pollution was rampant, etc... And yes there was graffiti then too.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
You're having this conversation with me.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 12:08pm.I'm really just advocating community problem solving and accountability. If you owned a business would you want to piss off the "vandals", or befriend them?
I wasn't lumping you per se into this
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 12:19pm.Sorry if it came out that way.
If I owned a business (and I'm real scary dang close to mebbe doing that) I would want to take steps to make sure the vandals knew I was not a good target.
Now if I had a politically charged business like a car lot, or a gunshop (no I'm not opening up either one) I would probably rely on security measures.
If I had a small downtown business I would still rely on some level of security, that just makes sense. I would use whatever outreach steps I felt was needed to ensure that my business was known in the community, and that vandalism isn't tolerated.
I don't know how to keep vandals off. But I don't want to piss them off, or become buddy buddy with that element either. Vandals do not strike me as good customers.
What is your happy medium?
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Boys... take it outside!
Submitted by einmaleins on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 12:33pm.I don't want to live in a society where I'm in the need of protecting my own with a gun.
Neither do I want to constantely clean up graffiti.
I do want conversation, connection and understanding.
Yet I don't want the hope for conversation be an excuse to never get anything done either.
So, the sun will drive away darkness, every morning new!
Let's leave it at that. it's philosophical fluff, but it works!
mathias
einmaleins
I wasn't thinking gun actually
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 12:38pm.Graffiti is not on my list of things that justify an armed presence.
I think you are onto something with your bit about the sun. This sort of thing generally happens in absence of light or people present.
A vibrant nightlife would perhaps help keep graffiti down. :-)
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
exactly
Submitted by einmaleins on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 12:44pm.That's why I started First Friday.
mathias
einmaleins
First Friday is awesome
Submitted by Logarithm on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 3:27pm.you're welcome.
Submitted by einmaleins on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 3:32pm."A vibrant nightlife would perhaps help keep graffiti down."
Submitted by Guglielmo on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 1:22pm.Whoever you are W1r3d1
Submitted by einmaleins on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 9:35am..... bring my some coffee by, when you come tag my window.
I'll be waiting for you.
Oh and about that pot of gold - you're welcome!
You really believe that there's a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow? That rainbow came straight out of my ar...! So, what does that make you?
mathias
einmaleins
the wired one
Submitted by enpen on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:03am.I'm pretty sure he has more than enough coffee to share a cup with you.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
Couldn't help it!
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:13am.I feel this way some days at work. Too much caffiene, too little customer interaction.
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress." --Mark Twain
Update:
Submitted by einmaleins on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 10:41am.Thanks to Alan and the ODA, the tag is removed and the window is clean again.
Well, sort off - now I need to actually clean the window from the drive-by dirt on State Ave. ;-)
mathias
That's funny.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:04am.Mathias, I will come by
Submitted by w1r3d1 on Tue, 06/17/2008 - 11:18am.tagging is not art
Submitted by chad360 on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 4:22pm.Plain & simple, tagging is not art, it is about ownership and geography...
...I'd just post a cam in the shop pointed at the window(s).
Where are the guard robots when you need them?
...anyways, hang in there =)
plain and what?
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 4:28pm.That sounds like an opinion, plain and simple. If you want to try to back it up with some facts, I'll throw some modern art collections and collectors into the fray. There are tags from the 70's & 80's worth thousands of dollars.
You seem to have an incomplete picture of what "it is about."
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
word. you beat me to it.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 4:30pm.How much is the tag in the window?
Submitted by chad360 on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 5:03pm.Really, if that tag was such a great example of art, then *please*, will either of you offer to buy & replace the window the next time it gets tagged so you can preserve this valuable community treasure...
...and while you are at it, please (oh please) explain to me what "it is all about" (oh word, I can't wait).
...where are all these rad tags you are talking about and how can the Oly community capitalize on them?
Why are investors not flocking to this "tag haven" for these real *art treasures*?
To me, tagging is junk, and as for the window tag, that is less than worthless.
Seriously (enpen & RR), must you be so snide to me? If what I say is my opinion, and you obviously recognize that, then what is your beef other than making sure you get your 2cents in edgewise?
So in my mind, just because something has market value does not mean it is worth anything, and for the record please don't assume I'm ignorant just because I disagree.
I think,
Submitted by Rob Richards on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 6:03pm.Furthermore, I don't think anybody on this thread defended this particular tag as being appropriate. Also, no one on this thread said that tagging (or graffiti) is art, therefore this tag is OK. I believe everybody universally expressed sympathy for Mathias here.
It seems we may be having two conversations at once here. One about this particular tag on the window at einmaleins, and another about graffiti art in general. The former is denounced, as it should be, the latter is gaining respect throughout the art community worldwide.
I put you on the defensive
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 10:52pm.My bad.
It is about a lot of things. Mostly what it is about is what the individual doing it brings. For some people it's political, for some it's fame, for some it's a ticket to a job doing something they love instead of sloughing it doing something they hate, for some it's about escaping a shitty home, for some it's about boredom, for some it's about the process of getting better, for some it's about the art and for some it's about hating. I missed a lot of someones in there because there are a lot of individual reasons for doing it.
Why did somebody do this to Mathias' window? I don't know. Does it suck? Yes. Does that mean that graffiti isn't art? That's ridiculous.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
*thanks*
Submitted by chad360 on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 10:45am.Enpen, thanks for the comment.
~'nuf said =)
I'm gonna make a real effort on the O-Blog here to not get snarky or too prickly, and I appreciate the effort both you and RR have made today and yesterday.
And thank you
Submitted by enpen on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 11:37pm.Sometimes I'm a jerk. I'm sorry for that.
"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe
I don't know about art but I know what is a cry for attention is
Submitted by Laurian on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 5:53pm.Tagging start out as a hairless ape's equivalent of dogs peeing on trees. Then some other apes with more money than brains commodified it turning into art and de-fanged it in the process. Capitalism: We'll take the symbols of your rebellion and sell it back to your bosses for twice what your bosses pay you in a year. But I digress.
Yes, there are some 'tags' that rise to the level of art, tags that took time, technique and thought, tags I'd call murals, but CPDT and other slap dash tags are not art. CPDT is about territory and asserting one's existence anonymously. (Anonymously. Anyone else see the irony in that?)
There is an interesting conversation to be had on the why's of tagging but please don't confuse the issue by calling it art. The stuff that appears on the Free Wall is art. The stuff that appears on, and occasionally in my building is vandalism. And I don't like it. Not one bit. Harrumph!
but Kilroy was there!
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 10:42pm."In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe