|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 3 users and 49 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 11:56pm.
[Another message from an anonymous St. Peter Nurse to share:] First, an update on negotiations: According to members of the negotiation team I've spoken with, there is a pretty serious impasse at this point, so future pickets should be expected. I will make a point of posting announcements here, via the kindness of Rob W, to keep you all updated. Second, I'd like to extend my gratitude to Rob R and the Poor People's Union for their ongoing vigils and general support. Because of their efforts, there are posters and literature all over town. They've done as well or better at advocating for St. Peter nurses than we are currently doing for ourselves, and I can honestly say that it has had a positive affect on my morale. Thank you so much! Third, I have noticed that there is some confusion in the community regarding the problem of low staffing levels at St. Peter. At least a couple people have indicated the impression that the reason we are not adequately staffed at St. Peter is a direct result of the overall nursing shortage. There is indeed a very serious worldwide shortage of nurses, and the current nurse population is aging, so the problem is going to get worse before it gets better. (The average age for an RN at St. Peter is 48!) But the low staffing levels are a result of a very conscious and very open downsizing policy implemented by the Administration and are totally unrelated to the nursing shortage. These are two separate issues. Finally, since another person who identified as a St. Peter employee offered his “subjective” view of life at St. Peter in reply to my previous post, I thought I would offer some subjectivity of my own. I've been an RN since the early 80's and have worked in a variety of settings, including a number of hospitals. I can honestly say that when I was hired at St. Peter in the late 90's I found it to be the most positive work environment I had ever encountered. What I found there was a setting in which, for the most part, the employees were genuinely united around a mission of service and felt good about their work. And I have to say that, to a considerable degree, the institution itself did much to foster and sustain that climate. Since being hired I have worked on nearly every unit and am quite familiar with the work culture throughout most of the hospital. Of course there are variations from one unit or shift to another. But for the most part what truly astonished me when I came to St. Peter was the sense of teamwork and general goodwill amongst employees throughout the hospital. There were definitely pockets of work groups where this was less true, but they were by far the exception. A new model of work organization was being implemented when I was hired called “Shaping Patient Care.” There were some minor annoyances with this plan such as renaming many work categories with feel-good labels. For instance, Certified Nursing Assistants = Patient Care Partners (PCPs), and Housekeepers = Unit Support Partners (USPs). But the concept was basically sound. The idea was to create a greater degree of teamwork and efficiency in order to better serve the patients and maximize human resources. It was overall very effective. On the picket line the other day, many people were remorsefully retracting any and all complaints they may have had about it at the time since, especially compared to the present, it was truly a golden period at St. Peter. On a typical medical or surgical in-patient unit during that period, each team would consist of an RN either working alone with a PCP, or sharing an LPN with another RN. The USPs, whose main focus was to keep the unit clean, were permanently assigned to a specific floor and were very much a part of the team. During days and early evenings, there were always at least 2 USPs on each floor. In addition to cleaning, they did other tasks such as emptying laundry carts, and keeping fresh coffee brewing for patients and their families. When they had time, they would fill water pitchers for patients and other such tasks. If willing, they were even trained to assist with transferring and repositioning patients when nurses needed an extra hand. My experience was that most of them reported that they liked having that kind of involvement with nursing staff in the care of patients. And their involvement was very much appreciated by nurses and patients alike. The first phase of The Restructure, the massive downsizing project that began in 2003-2004, was a huge layoff of USPs. The few who remain are no longer assigned to specific floors, but float the entire house in pairs attending to only the bare bones of their previous cleaning duties. Nursing staff now have to take time away from patients in order to bag linens and make coffee. We no longer have those extra pairs of hands available to help out in a pinch, or those extra pairs of eyes to happen by a room and notice a patient in trouble. The units are not kept nearly as clean and the USP staff report dramatically less satisfaction with their already difficult jobs. They are now a very diminished and isolated work group, and we miss them. The next phase of The Restructure, during 2004, was a huge layoff of PCPs. It was a sad time and a great loss. It was a gradual process in which, by the end, RNs were left working alone with very nearly as many, and often exactly as many, patients as they previously managed in partnership with a PCP or an LPN. The few LPNs who remain now take a full patient load alone with oversight from an RN who may have his or her own assignment, or be in charge of the unit, or both. The very few remaining PCPs are no longer assigned to a specific unit, and are utilized house-wide for one purpose only: to sit with confused and agitated patients who might otherwise cause harm to themselves or require restraint. The sum total of these measures, combined with the effects of cuts in other departments, has significantly diminished the quality of care at St. Peter, as explained previously, and has had a profoundly negative affect on morale and RN retention as a result. As for the input from Norm, that other St. Peter employee who commented on my previous post, I will say the following: He and I apparently very much agree on how ill-conceived it was for the administration to initiate the series of layoffs and what an especially huge hit it was for the nursing staff and our patients to lose our PCPs. But his general perception of the dynamic between members of the patient care teams left me wondering if he could possibly be talking about the same place I've worked all these years. Based on my experience and observations, I am totally baffled as to what he thought he was seeing or who he could possibly be talking to that would lead to such statements. There are always exceptions, and those exceptions occur within each work title or category house-wide. But my observation over the years is that the employees in all department and of all titles at St. Peter have largely been hardworking and respectful of one another. Before The Restructure, RNs worked side-by-side with PCPs to get the bedside care done. We'd usually split up the baths and answered lights as able. There was nearly always a mutual sense of cooperation and respect. Again, the exception was rare. (And, yes, RNs make more money than PCPs. It's a fact of life in our economic system and is the reason so many of them are in Nursing School.) Norm doesn't say what his job is, but indicates that he is neither an RN, an LPN, nor a PCP. Without knowing much about an RN's duties it is quite possible for an onlooker to see a nurse on the phone or sitting at the desk or out-of-sight in the medication room and not understand that being somewhere other than the bedside does not mean she/he is not taking care of patients. A person who knows nothing about an RN's duties may have no idea how many phone calls it can take to address a problem a patient is experiencing. Or all that is involved with admitting a new patient. Or to coordinate diagnostic test or a surgical procedure or to arrange a safe discharge or transfer or deal with a death or console a family member. Or to clarify an order or to research an unfamiliar medication or treatment. Or to administer those medications and treatments. When onlookers see nurses in conversation with doctors or other nurses or members of other disciplines at the nurses station, odds are very likely that they are witnessing a discussion of a patient's condition and/or treatment. They probably have no idea how much written documentation is required, and so on, and on and on and on. ALL of which is why it is so imperative to have more staff available to the bedside ... the RN cannot always be there!!! I will conclude by happily pointing out that Norm himself is rare exception. He represents a severe contradiction to the mutually supportive environment I've experienced amongst employees at St. Peter. We certainly have our petty rivalries like any other work place. And, of course, as low staffing levels and high work loads have increased pressure on everyone, internal relations have been negatively affected. Yet, I am constantly amazed at the degree of solidarity and goodwill under the circumstances. There are plenty of disgruntled employees at St. Peter these days, but until I encountered Norm on Olyblog, I can honestly say I could never have imagined any fellow employee who would publicly and so unfairly excoriate a group of co-workers in the manner he did – especially during that group's contract negotiation. To the vast majority of the community – Thank you so much for your support! |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events |
Some poeple think it's their job...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 6:53am....to point out counterexamples to any proposition, no matter how far flung, irrelevant, or inappropriate.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Rick, who is that directed to?
Submitted by blagoblag on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 2:33pm.I find it hard to imagine that's what you meant, but I am struggling to find a different interpretation. Help?
If that's a hard interpretation to understand...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 2:59pm....then you haven't been reading OlyBlog very long. In my experience, which I've expressed on several occasions to different people on the blog, they feel compelled to find counter evidence to EVERY position, even when it is clearly not in the flow of conversation or relevant to the discussion. Something about blogging makes people confrontational in a way that they would never be in person. It's not having to look the person in the eye when you say it, I think.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Do you honestly believe
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 3:03pm.We are the precious chosen few, let all the rest be damned. There's only room for one or two, we can't have Heaven crammed!
If that were true...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 3:07pm....then why did he post a diatribe about lazy nurses during a union protest? Get it?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
I assume you mean this
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 3:33pm.He established his respect for nurses and acknowledged they're going through hardship. He told of his disgust over the mistreatment (laying off) that had occured.
He gave a brief background showing where he gets off being able to offer an observation and thoughts.
Maybe you want Norm to list every single non-nurse who had a problem with RNs but unless you have good reason to believe him a liar it's not necessary. While he's going to point out a problem he had with RNs he's again shown support for pcp's. Or is it that we should only consider RNs true Nurses and the rest don't have the right to that title?
Norm is giving an observation from his experience. He's not forming an abstract opinion, he's declaring concrete fact. If he's wrong, such as misbelieving that a nurse online was surfing the personals for example, then he's wrong but when the topic is Nurses Working Conditions he's got the right to tell it as he saw it.
More observation, this time with insight into how non-nurses saw things. Again if he's wrong he wrong but this time it offers valuable insight into what "the other side" is thinking. Much like Norm might've (I won't speak for him) taken some of the counterpoints in the email.
Strong opinion but based solely on what he experienced. Notice he's not even condemning all nurses? Plus he didn't think the changes that led to their current conditions was the right thing to do.
In his experience he dealt with nurses that were either lazy, or which he perceived to be lazy. How is that inappropriate in a discussion about working nurses? If his observations are correct then his comments are very valid. If his perception was wrong he's been known to accept things being shown to him.
Part of the definition for diatribe calls for the criticism to be abusive. Unless it's wrong to call someone lazy when they are he wasn't abusive.
I read the post.
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:03pm.I know what he said.
The question isn't whether what he said is true, Merwyn. I don't think he's lying about his experience. The question is what the overall message is that his contribution communicates. All the protestations about how much he likes/understands nurses is there so he can present negative information. Why does he want to present negative information about nurses in this context? It wasn't the focus of the conversation. Didn't you wonder? I'd really like to know the answer. I'm not sure Norm knows why he posted it. My guess is that he didn't really think about it all that deeply, and just rattled off his experience because it seemed to be on the same topic.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Wow
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:18pm.Blagoblag, Merwyn, thank you for the kind words.
Rick, I read your response earlier this morning and decided that responding to it would just play into this game that you seem to want to play with me. You seem to be trying to bait me. Is that your intention?
As you yourself noted...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:23pm....you seem to have a singular talent at rubbing people the wrong way on the blog (although not in person, in my experience). Did you ever wonder why? Have you thought about why you're posting the things you do? I'm not the one baiting, my friend.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
"then you haven't been reading Olyblog very long"
Submitted by blagoblag on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:30pm.Not
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:32pm.When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Thanks for clarifying
Submitted by blagoblag on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:33pm.Sorry 'bout that
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:34pm.When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
EDIT
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 10:22am.EDIT: To be fair I'm keeping the comments here. With that in mind, to anyone reading, I apologize. This was not exactly the most mature response with the current dialogue. Sometimes I revert to my 12y/o persona....I blame Cartman.
Haven't we kind of passed that point anymore Rick? Unless that was you being facetious. Let's not dirty up such a nice word by using it on each other.
PS Sometimes....I cry at night....cause I think you don't really like me =p
Wow.
Submitted by blagoblag on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 3:32pm.I'm with Merwyn on this one.
I didn't read a diatribe; I read an alternative perspective from someone who was in a position to have some first-hand observations. I thought he made the context and limits of his perspective pretty clear. I don't agree with everything he said, but I certainly was not offended by the fact that he offered a dissenting opinion. For me it enriches the discussion to know that there are mulitple perspectives that aren't solely on one side of the fence or the other. I also appreciated the chance to read the responses his post prompted.
Is there any level or form disagreement that you would have found acceptable? Or do you think it had no business in that thread at all?
And by the way, I've been reading Olyblog for more than a year.
Why would one want to offer a dissenting opinion?
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:05pm.It makes no sense. Does he think nurses don't need more help/pay/respect? Of course not. So what exactly was the point?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
The point?
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 5:25pm."The administration has tried to spin this profit-driven scheme as an effort to IMPROVE care by increasing the percentage of staff which are licensed RNs."
Assuming that you read my "diatribe" (Merwyn pretty much pointed out that it doesn't fall under that category) you'd notice I addressed this issue. This was my reason for even starting to type. My dissent was towards this, I don't agree that it is, at least solely, a profit-driven scheme. I think there are other facets to it.
IF I had logged in and type the exact quote as above, and said, "I disagree, I think there's more to it than profit." I would have had my butthole cleaned out by the proof police asking me why I would think that, how I had come to this belief, what proof I could provide to backup my claim, and what blood type I was. As opposed to receiving this enema from you, and a select other few, I decide to relate it all ahead of time to go along with my point. Therefore fewer questions would be asked.
What I didn't expect was Rob telling me that I was a distortion and distraction, and you telling me that I was going off on a diatribe that even I couldn't explain. There were a few other points, but the above was the main one.
Keep your eyes peeled because I'm planning on providing a bit of dissent for this thread too. I'd love nothing more than for you to pick it apart for me Rick, because really in life that's what I love is to rub you the wrong way...just you though.
In the future, I would appreciate it if you just, gee I dunno, sent me an instant message about disliking my contributions, or perceived lackof, as opposed to muddying someone elses thread with it.
Let me get this straight...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 5:52pm.You think firing the support staff and selling it as an increase in the patient/RN ratio isn't spin? This is why you posted?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Are you trying to put words
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 12:22pm.Are you trying to put words in my mouth? When did I say it wasn't a spin? When did I even bring "spin" into the conversation. I quoted the nurse, and said I think there may have been more to it.
I think there are other facets to it. Other, which means I'm including the initial, and think there are other reasons compounded with this one. You don't have to believe it Rick. If other folks can talk about things that they've seen, and reasons why they think something has happend due to it, can't I?
Absolutely.
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 5:35pm.But did you consider the message you would convey with your contribution? Don't you think the nurses should be better supported? Don't you want to support their union? There are consequences to what you write, and it isn't appropriate to say everything you now at every possible opportunity.
I don't doubt there are some bad nurses. But that's not really the point. If we were talking about cops negotiating with a hostile administration, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be trying to add your "other facets" to broaden the discussion (there are some bad apples -- and I know you know it). You'd be focusing on all the ways that policing should be valued in our community.
Do you have any idea what I'm talking about?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
This has been going on for
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 6:58pm.Agreed.
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 10:10pm.When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
First off, when I worked as
Submitted by Phil Owen on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 4:37pm.First off, when I worked as an EMT in this county (1999 through 2001) I found the nurses at St Pete's (particularly in the ER) to be absolutely fantastic. The ER nurses were very hard working, and even with the stress of an over-run ER they took the time to listen and get the best information from the EMT's, paramedics, and the patients themselves. On interfacility transports from other floors at St Pete's, I often found that the nurses had a very strong rapport with their patients, did very thorough work, and carefully communicated all the important information on the patients. This was not my experience at many other hospitals, and was very different from my experiences with a whole lot of nursing homes and private clinics (and do I have some horror stories). Nurses at St Peter's deserve the best, because that's what they give.
I must also stress that, in my experience, there is no such thing as a good health care company. There are outstanding health care workers, and there are hospitals etc that are filled with outstanding workers, but the leadership and policies of health care companies are terrible. For-profit companies (like the ambulance company I worked for) are very clear that money is the bottom line, and the bottom line all too often is sought at the expense of patient care and employee satisfaction. And non-profits, for some reason, have largely decided to follow the for-profit models of doing business. Thus the conflict at St. Peter's.
No health care worker (or really any worker for that matter) should be without a union. Unions ensure that the interests of workers are met, and typically the interests of health care workers are to offer the best in patient care. Thanks to the PSPH nurses for their hard organizing work!
The Canaanite's Call
Secondly...
Submitted by Phil Owen on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 12:41pm.I'm getting a little tired of the squabbling here. Rick, your general reaction to Norm both on this thread and in general seems to be getting pretty personal. I don't agree with Norm here, but I think it is important that he be allowed to disagree and dissent.
Olyblog is a great forum for organizing. But I think it is more important that Olyblog be a great site for citizen journalism and a forum for discussion. This requires openness and a finely tuned willingness to listen and engage with diverse ideas. Sometimes the need for a "unified message", or to suppress dissent, in an organizing drive will conflict with the needs of open discourse. Yet the needs of discourse must take higher priority on this site if it has any claim to "citizen journalism".
The Canaanite's Call
I'm not interested in a unified message...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 5:50pm....as much as I am in people being a bit more mindful about what they post. At another time, it would be a fine topic for a thread. Norm may be an expert about hospital administration, but unless his goal is to disrupt the organizing that is taking place, he should wait for a more opportune time to tell his story.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Written over 2 days, bear with me
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 1:09pm.I am incredibly hyper right now, it being Friday and I’ve had 2 energy drinks in the last 3 hours. So I am intentionally slowing down and trying to give a clear and honest response. I read your thoughts this morning, and wanted to let it digest for awhile so I chose to start writing this response later in the day.
First, I’d like to again say that you could not pay me enough to be an RN, LPN, PCP, CNA or any other acronym that involves nursing care. I could not hold myself to the level of empathy and compassion that a good nurse holds themselves to.
Second, I feel I may have worded parts of my initial response badly. I in no way feel that RN’s are a bunch of lazy people. This is not what I was trying to convey and I don’t want it to seem that way. I think the majority of nurses I have worked with have been above par in all areas, and a good number of them to be excellent.
With both of those points in mind, there are still some problems with nursing staff, and some of those problems have been around for awhile. I think you would agree with me considering some of your statements: “What I found there was a setting in which, for the most part, the employees were genuinely united…Of course there are variations from one unit or shift to another…..there were definitely pockets of work groups where this was less true....There are always exceptions, and those exceptions occur within each work title or category house-wide.
The entire time that I have worked here there has been an ongoing joke (which isn’t really funny, but humorous in a sad way) that if we were ever admitted to the hospital and couldn’t communicate, that we would want our coworkers to make sure we were placed in a “good” unit. At one point we actually had a list that we kept the unit/floors that we would not allow ourselves to be placed on if we were to become ill. We were going to make copies and make sure they were taped to the front of our charts. Sad huh? It wasn’t just myself, or one other coworker, it was a group of us. Being that you have worked on most of the units I’m sure that you have noticed the level of care can be very different in different units, on different shifts, with different nursing staff. Have you noticed this? If so can you deny this?
On more than one occasion I’ve seen patients in states that should be illegal and have wanted to write-up the nursing staff involved only to have coworkers say, “It’s been like that for forever, don’t even bother.” The times when I’ve called it to the attention of a supervisor they end up taking it to their supervisor and it just dwindles away, as if it never really happened. I’m not saying this is a common occurrence, but it happened often enough that I felt a little ashamed of the place that I work at. When the offending staff repeatedly did the same thing over and over again, and continued to have employment there, it was a little depressing. Does this seem right to you? Would you send a friend or family member to the hospital knowing that they may end up with nursing staff like that?
Maybe it was all a financial move. In my heart though I think administration didn’t want to fire any RN’s for fear of looking bad and the plan to fire the PCP’s seemed like it would solve a financial problem (I think they were wrong in this regard) and also make the “problem nurses” have to be accountable for patient care. I also believe that the move was geared towards there being more “licensed” staff doing patient care…yet another move that I think was not only unnecessary but not very well thought out.
I don’t want to get any longer winded than I have to be, but I do want to answer some of the questions/thoughts you had.
Norm doesn't say what his job is, but indicates that he is neither an RN, an LPN, nor a PCP.
That’s correct, I didn’t. You, having worked there so long, probably know that males are in the minority. If I said what my title was I would leave very little doubt as to who I am. You being anonymous can surely understand that. Rest assured, working at St. Pete’s for as long you have, in so many units, we have run into each other before.
Without knowing much about an RN's duties it is quite possible for an onlooker to see a nurse on the phone or sitting at the desk or out-of-sight in the medication room and not understand that being somewhere other than the bedside does not mean she/he is not taking care of patients.
Notice I didn’t mention the nursing staff being out of sight or being on the phone. When you have 2 RN’s sitting at the front desk reading cosmo and looking at floor-plans online for the house they want to build, it’s hard to imagine them concentrating on patient care. Seeing it occasionally would make me think they were on a break. Seeing it throughout the shift over 8 hours makes me think something else. How about you?
I will conclude by happily pointing out that Norm himself is rare exception. He represents a severe contradiction to the mutually supportive environment I've experienced amongst employees at St. Peter.
Huh? Now you are assuming that I present myself this way in front of my patients? I am not a nurse, yet I have helped comfort patients who were puking, wiped the behinds of patients who couldn’t do so themselves, helped nurses clean up their patients (for those who can’t get out of bed to use the bathroom), heck I’ve even helped insert an NG tube (I had to go puke afterwards). I’ve had nurses who were so busy they couldn’t wheel a patient out after discharge and had nobody to help, so I’ve helped there. I’ve restrained patients that wanted nothing more to take a swipe at their nurse. I’ve been pee’d on, poo’d on, scratched, kicked, slapped, punched and puked on all in my time working at St. Pete’s. All to help out other people, including nursing staff. I’ve responded to white teams where they had become so desperate that they were asking for “all males” to respond. I’ve run over to 1south to help nursing out when things got hectic. I’ve cheered up nurses who thought they were going to lose their jobs, I’ve tried to cheer up nurses who were heart-broken having to tell family that their loved-one had passed away. I have been nothing but supportive to my coworkers, even the ones that I didn’t always agree with.
There are plenty of disgruntled employees at St. Peter these days, but until I encountered Norm on Olyblog, I can honestly say I could never have imagined any fellow employee who would publicly and so unfairly excoriate a group of co-workers in the manner he did – especially during that group's contract negotiation.
I’m actually pretty happy with my work environment. I work with a small number of nurses and they are all great. MOST of the nurses I have worked with in my time at St. Pete’s have been great. There have been those who I had a hard time accepting their behavior. This is the first time, publicly, I have ever talked about some of the problems I have seen at the hospital. I’m not the only one who wants to though, I just feel vocal enough to talk about the other side. There are others like me out there, and some of them are nurses. A chain is only as strong as it’s weakest link, if the weak links are allowed to stay what does that say for the organization?
I cannot imagine how this would affect contract negotiations. If you truly believe that this would affect the negotiations send me a message and I’ll repost them after the negotiation is over.
FYI I still believe that it is asinine to have staff, who are not on the floors/units, deciding which floors/units can take more patients and which floors can’t. I feel this should be left to the charge nurse. I’ve seen more than one charge nurse lose her composure from having admitting tell her that they were taking 2 more patients, and staffing telling her that she can’t get more staff.
Not interested
Submitted by libby on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 7:28pm.Norm,
Throughout this thread I have greatly appreciated Rick's attempts to question the purpose or point of your comments. I haven't figured out the answer but I have decided that for me there is absolutely no point in engaging with you.
-the St. Peter nurse
Why not? Are you one of the
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sun, 08/05/2007 - 10:22am.This happens every few months, Rick decides that whatever he's thinking is the official word of Olyblog and by God don't say anything different.
Quote:
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 10:11am.Perhaps you're the old biddy nurse on the third floor who jumped all over Tammy because she didn't bring her own ice from home before getting her Neupogen shot?
THAT is exactly what I'm talking about. The above nurse doesn't care. That shouldn't be right. Rick brought up what I might be saying if the police were negotiating for a new contract. I HOPE that someone would step-up and say, "Wait, there was a guy and his buddy that had some problems the other day. Before we agree to give you a raise lets take a look at this case and see if maybe we need better oversight." Isn't that what negotiation is? Give and take? I think there are many fine nurses at St. Pete's, many of them deserve better conditions. Before we grant that lets take a look at this nurse that was unprofessional toward Merwyn's significant other. Is that so wrong?
In all fairness that was one
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 10:47am.We are the precious chosen few, let all the rest be damned. There's only room for one or two, we can't have Heaven crammed!
Too true. Did you complain?
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 10:51am.Well, someone else (not me)
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 10:59am.I'm sure that complaint had nothing to do with why I haven't seen her much since.
If by chance that was standard behavior for that nurse then she has no business working in healthcare. I wonder if she flipped out whenever blood, vomit or worse needed to be mopped up.