User login

Who's online

There are currently 6 users and 48 guests online.

Online users

  • GooseKaler
  • Rick
  • agathafrye
  • Phil Owen
  • einmaleins
  • JMK

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • GooseKaler
  • LongRider
  • non illegitimi ...
  • acreatureapart
  • eristalis

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Rick on Sun, 01/15/2006 - 5:56pm.

Warning: the following post concerns national politics, and is only indirectly related to Olympia.

John Aravosis at AMERICAblog has an analysis of the appointment of Rep. Clyburn to be the Democratic point person on upcoming ethics investigations. This seems like a bad idea, given that Clyburn is potentially implicated in these same scandals:

First, we have Nancy Pelosi announcing the choice of Cong. Clyburn to run the ethics battle:

Congressman James Clyburn of South Carolina, the newly and unanimously elected Chairman of the Democratic Caucus who has lived his life with a commitment to a high ethical standard, will head the Clean House Team.

Then we have NPR confirming that Clyburn has his own ethics accusations to deal with:

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay isn't the only politician facing ethics charges. South Carolina's James Clyburn and Mississippi's Bennie Thompson, both Democratic members of the Congressional Black Caucus, also had to answer tough questions last week. In 1997, both men traveled to the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. commonwealth. The trip -- and an earlier trip to the Marianas by two associates of DeLay -- appears to have been paid for by lobbyist Jack Abramoff. It is a violation of House ethics to accept gifts from a registered lobbyist. Abramoff is now the subject of a federal corruption probe.

And finally, as would be expected, the National Republican Congressional Committee blasts Pelosi for picking someone to lead the ethics reform battle who themselves is under an ethical cloud:

Clyburn, however, had been connected to the very lobbyist around whom Democrats are building their "clean up Congress" campaign - Jack Abramoff. In 1997, Abramoff paid for a trip costing more than $10,000 that Clyburn took to the Northern Mariana Islands in the Pacific Ocean. (Roll Call, 5/5/05)

What is it with these people? Are they so suicidal that they insist on shooting themselves in the foot every single chance they get? What possible reason could there be to appoint Clyburn to this position, let alone keep him there now that we all know he's got his own explaining to do regarding Abramoff?

Read it for yourself, and let Brian Baird know how you feel about it.

»

Neither party is going to enj

Neither party is going to enjoy having to explain how Washington really does business.
»

I think we'll definetly see a

I think we'll definetly see a long string of indictments and/or finger pointing. If the number of congresspersons involved is as high as I've heard, this could go on for a while. If nothing else, it will have a huge effect on the upcoming elections.

I believe republicans need to seperate themselves from the whole thing as quickly as possible. In order to do this, and improve thier standing with voters, they need to start pushing legislation now. A great first step would be to completely do away with earmarks. An earmark is an addition to a bill that earmarks an amount of money to a certain project, usually some pork that a lobbyist has pushed for.

After that, perhaps adding a law that requires a certain amount of time between when a bill is printed and when it is voted on. You'd be sadly surprised at the low number of bills that are actually read by congress before they are approved.

Ted Kennedy suggested, and I agree, that there should be limitations put on how one can lobby while the congress in session. This could include doing away completely with parties in D.C. thrown by lobbyists.

The matter of personal gifts is kind of a sticky one. If a congressperson visits a high school in thier area they should be allowed to accept a gift from the high school, it would seem kind of rude to have to refuse these kinds of gifts and would take the personalism out of the job. There should be limits on the amount gifts cost, or perhaps on who can give them. The sticky part for me is having to decide who the "good guys" are and who the "bad guys" are.

The term "culture of corruption" is being thrown around a lot lately, and is an adequate description of much of what goes on in D.C., but I think it also leads people to think that we should accept it because that's just the way things are. I think we all can agree, on both sides of the aisle, that our culture is not one that accepts corruption as a part of life. Americans do not value corruption, we, for the most part hold moral standards that directly oppose corruption. We should all take up this cause, because if this is as widespread as it appears to be, then "we the people" are not being represented in government. Our needs and best interests are being put on a far back burner and simple greed is deciding our futures, the futures of our children, planet, etc.

»

Instituting a term limit woul

Instituting a term limit would work in this case, also.

Those who have been in Washington for too long tend to be the people who have no idea of what's going on in reality and are the people who tend to be more accepting of lobbyist efforts.

I don't know how many people watch MSNBC but "Scarbarough Country" is a pretty good show. Joe Scarbarough, a former Republican representative from Florida, is the host. At any rate, he and Chris Matthews were discussing about what happens up on Capitol Hill and Scarbarough said lobbying itself isn't wrong, since it's essentially a group/individual supporting a candidate which shares the same interest. The problem, he said, is with politicians who feel it is necessary to base their voting on who has given them money. Scarbarough said he was (obviously) approached a number of times with contributions. He said he was very clear to those offering that they are more than welcome to donate to his office, as that should be their right but that he was not going to base his voting on who has donated X-amount of dollars.

Long story short, I think ensuring there's no institutionalized politicians would, for the most part, solve this problem on its own.

»

The line between politician a

The line between politician and lobbyist has become incredibly blurred lately, which I think is a big part of the problem. Many people are getting out of politics to become lobbyists because that's simply where the money is.

The one and only true solution, I think, is for voters to be more informed about who they are voting for. Stop focusing on one or two issues and start finding out what kind of person they are.

»

Here's a couple ideas: No co

Here's a couple ideas:
  • No congress person currently in office can run for re-election.
  • All future elections will be funded solely through public contribution. i.e. No private donations will be allowable to support a run for elected office. All candidates will receive equal public funding.
I am bothered and saddened by, and fearful of, this state of politics.
»

The federal government should

The federal government should (and constitutionally will) protect the right to bear arms by organized militias (i.e. the States' National Guards) but not necessarily by private citizens.

Corruption in congress is unacceptable. Please make every effort possible to root out illegal, unethical improprietous financial doings and goings on.

It is time that today's congress men and women wake up and realize their sole fundamental duty - to serve the People of the USA. Financial speculations should come only when every last man, woman and child in the USA is "taken care of" - i.e. when we are guaranteed appropriate food, shelter, education and employment, etc. requirements - PERIOD. It is disgusting to me to see so many politicians getting rich on the coattails of public office holdership.

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter