|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 39 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 11:56am.
This is something that I'm going to try to do each week, a review of the Olympia City Council packet, which is typically available online each Friday here as a zip file. This won't be a totally thorough or unbiased review, I'm mostly going to pick out things that I find interesting. 1. For the 18th and Fones Rd. improvement project to go forward, the city needed some property from developer Paul DeTray. He didn't want to sell, so they started a condemnation process, and now the city is willing to pay him $925,000. 2. What was Drew Hendricks photographing at the transit center? Interesting part of the Jan. 24 meeting minutes: Councilmember Johnson reported Intercity Transit has revised its policy on photography and Drew Hendricks is no longer barred from the Olympia Transit Station property. He said the Board will be working on redefining and implementing regulations related to inappropriate behaviors at the Transit Center. 3. Work plans for all the advisory committees are in the packet because the council is starting its recruitment process and this is the time that they generally thing about what the committees should be for. 4. City manager pay may go up by $2,565 with a $4,000 performance bonus. |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Sorry to TFI, who posted a co
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 11:58am.Thanks man.
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 12:01pm.The City tries to purchase pr
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 12:55pm.This is government at the best. They offer to purchase your property, you decline, they strong-arm. »- Login or register to post comments
5th Amendment of the US Con
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 1:14pm.5th Amendment of the US Constitution: "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
For a public purpose, government, as agents of the public, can condemn private property. The purpose of this offer is to settle a lawsuit filed by DeTray in response to the city's condemnation process. The offer is more than the assesed value, and if anyone knows that side of town, there is a dire public need to improve roads there. Especially since there are more than a few developments being built just south of there.
I'm well-aware of eminent dom
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 1:42pm.I was going to ask which piece of property on Fones Rd. it was because, when I saw the offer, I was pretty amazed.
We discussed before, Justice Stevens was the author of the majority opinion expanding eminent domain to include economic improvement. Really, the City doesn't even need to use it for a road. They could simply say a Target is more of an economic benefit to the community than idle land and take the property.
The purpose of the property
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 2:44pm.Stormwater retention pond?Ok,
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 4:54pm.Ok, I thought his property would be used for widening the road.
How badly needed is a stormwater retention pond on Fones Rd.? Does this really serve the community?
Is it so bad that the City needs to start using what is probably, in my opinion, one of the more controversial portions of the Constitution?
I'm pretty firm in that eminent domain should be used only when absolutely necessary.
Drew Hendricks here. What ha
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 02/03/2006 - 10:47pm.I have a laptop, a video came
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/04/2006 - 11:50am.