User login

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 35 guests online.

Online users

  • Rob Richards

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • systematist
  • itsthewater
  • tsunamizombie
  • Brooks
  • Teresa Marie Staal

Poster Calendar

July

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Rob Richards on Wed, 03/01/2006 - 2:46pm.
I want to talk about the ODA and the City Council.

The PBIA was created just a few months ago, and now all of the money is gone. "Where did it go?", you might ask. The answer: nobody knows. Thus far, Jeff Trinin and the ODA have not been able to produce any documentation showing exactly where the money was spent, regardless of the budget committees' requests.

The PBIA recently had an election for their board. The result? A bunch of members of the ODA were elected. In fact, not a single person that hasn't been a member of the ODA was elected. This is not proving to be an entity that represents the community.

The ODA has voluntary membership, the PBIA is mandatory. When the bills went out for the PBIA there was a check box that you check if you DO NOT want to be a member of the ODA. I assume that many business owners decided they might as well be members, after all, the ODA has no dues, and will be deciding how the PBIA works. I can imagine that the ODA's membership numbers have grown significantly since the start of the PBIA. Well now, because of possible mismanagment of funds, they are reinstating their membership dues. So all those PBIA members are going to be charged another $180.

One of the city's goals for this year was increased transparancy in government. Given that, I believe it is the city's responsibility to audit the ODA and PBIA to find out exactly where the money went. They also need to audit the PBIA board election, rumors of colusion have been swirling. Laura Ware even raised the question of the ODA "harvesting" nominations at one of the budget meetings I attended, drawing a long winded "no comment" from Jeff Trinin.

The thing that irks me the most is that the city is not asking us what we want. They are taking the "I'm an elected official, I know what's best for you" approach. I really don't believe that Olympians want to live in a city that caters to cars. All of the trends that I've seen since moving here indicate that people's minds are thinking of a walkable Olympia with an amazing transit system. Olympia is quite as walker friendly as it could be, but, for a city of our size we have an amazing public transportation system.

In conclusion, I don't think the ODA has proven itself to be responsible enough to be in charge of our downtown, and I think we should let the council hear about it. If they won't listen, let's replace them. We are at a point where we have to keep moving towards sustainability, if we allow current trends to continue we are going to end up living in a city that is not ready for an uncertain future. It's all hands on deck time!

»

The City is already discussin

The City is already discussing chopping Capitol Way down to three-lanes.

I don't know what decision could be more unfriendly to car transit.

It's certainly a gamble. A lot of people are already grumbling at the mere thought. Once they start sitting in traffic for an hour getting into and leaving the downtown area, you'll really begin to hear the noise.

Unless, of course, they begin to shop elsewhere and/or look for an alternative location to work.

In this case, silence would be deafening.

Are the ODA and PBIA private groups? Or are they part of the local government?

»

The ODA is a private group, a

The ODA is a private group, and they entered into a contract with the city to improve downtown. To me, that means that the city needs to hold them to the same level of transparancy they claim to hold themselves to, and we need to hold the city accountable to that as well.
»

So a public-private partnersh

So a public-private partnership.

If the ODA is receiving tax dollars from the City of Olympia then yes, the City would be well-within their responsibility to demand, at the very least, fiscal accountability as to where money is going from their partner.

Of course, much of this will have to do with what was agreed to in the contract. If the City was stupid enough to give anyone free reign over their money they deserve what they get.

If this is the chain of events required to start voting out the City Council, Hallalujah! Divine intervention, baby.

»

I know it's a common libertar

I know it's a common libertarian trait to be against holding businesses accountable for their actions, as long as they aren't breaking the law, but I would think you would make an exeption when it directly affects you and everyone else in town. Besides, we don't know there hasn't been a law broken yet, from what I've seen and heard, there is a good possibility. It was city money that they blew on who knows what, and I don't understand why T.J., Laura and Karen (the city finance committee) aren't demanding that the ODA show them where the money went. If they have this already, they should post it on the website. I also don't understand why the Olympian isn't keeping us informed on this daily, it's yet another case of we the people being left out in the cold.
»

I agree that the City should

I agree that the City should ask where their money went.

It would be no different than if you and I were to enter into a business partnership and I was keeping you in the dark about the financial state of our endeavour. If you needed to bring in an arbitrator to start opening up books, you certainly wouldn't be in the wrong. The same would apply to the City in this situation.

It just seemed to me that the original post wanted the City to start acting as an oversight for all ODA matters. That's why I asked whether or not they're a private group.

Again, if there aren't any laws being broken and the City Council is either too ignorant or too lazy to start demanding where their money is, it just shows you how much they care about your money. The blame is equally shared by the ODA for being irresponsible and for the City Council for not giving a damn about your money. And the worst part? If all of this money was mismanged, etc. and City money was wasted, you know they're going to come back to the well (the public) and ask for more.

Fiscal irresponsibility is a big reason why I'm not a fan of the Olympia City Council. I think they tend to waste quite a bit of public money and mismanage their department resources.

»

For clarification, the ODA is

For clarification, the ODA is a private group, but the PBIA is not, it is a city project which the ODA is overseeing. I'm not asking the city to oversee ALL of the ODA's business, just in cases when it involves the city, and taxpayer money. The ODA, for the last few years, has been recieving, some would say fraudulently, Neighborhood Block Grant monies, so I think oversight is needed with that as well. Neighborhood Block Grant money is intended to go to neighborhood associations. By definition and by their own admission, the ODA is a business association not a neighborhood association. This is where the controversy over that money stems from.
»

I probably shouldn't say too

I probably shouldn't say too much about all of this because I don't really have a solid idea about how all of these groups are related to each other.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Olyblogger of the Month:

decorabilia

Sponsored by:

Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are:

Rob Richards
Interests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism.

emmettoconnell
Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum.

enpen
Interests: OlyBlog poster calendar, Olympia public art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff.

Robert Whitlock
Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment

Rick
Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons.

Get Firefox!

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter