User login

Who's online

There are currently 18 users and 66 guests online.

Online users

  • jusbytheclown
  • Guglielmo
  • tctvjohn
  • Just another voice
  • Rob Richards
  • Thomas 27
  • earball
  • epersonae
  • OperaGirl
  • The Original Yoda

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • Ron
  • memetic_alchemy
  • cfs
  • Badlonspb
  • davefromcarolina

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 8:13am.

Yes, controlling, much. The Olympian has another editorial today about Neo-Nazis in which they counsel "Simply ignore them.". In the comments thread we are told "Anyone who shows up at the Nazis gathering - for ANY REASON - is doing their bidding. Period.

People who monitor hate groups disagree.

Hate message is unwelcome 

Practical reasons for counter demonstration

»

I hate to say it, but I agree

I hate to say it, but I agree with the Olympian. If the first outing came and went with no fanfare, the Nazi's would have looked elsewhere for what they want. Large groups, controversy, and their 15 minutes of fame.
»

They want recruits. This is a

They want recruits. This is an ongoing recruitment drive, in progress. The NSM is a national Neo-Nazi group looking to recruit from the current pool of loose white supremacists. Various white supremacist groups have recently broken up due to in-fighting etc., this is an ideal time to recruit, along with the fact that our economy sucks and there are more people looking for answers. Which the NSM says they provide.

How would we make sure no one responds? Imagine back on 1/22 here in Olympia, what if no one responded? Sounds lovely, the NSM packs up their toys and leaves? But what about the family getting off the bus nearby who have to cope with what they see in front of them, who realize that no one in town apparently gives a damn about their safety?

Why isn't a diverse array of responses and strategies seen as a -good- thing instead of as something messy/bad and to be controlled? Also, why are targets blamed for somehow causing Nazis to keep on nazi-ing?

Silence is some sort of luxury that many of us just don't have.

(I put this in the wrong place in thread, supposed to be reply to white feather.)

»

From what I heard the Nazi's

From what I heard the Nazi's were in more control than the hippies. In-fact, someone said the cops had to rescue the Nazi's from the hippies. Sounds like the people at the bus stop would have been just fine.

The "other side", I call hippies, have singlehandedly given this group a reason to come back. We could have ignored them the first time and would have had a 50/50 chance of that being the one event. Now, they have a reason to come back. And many on this blog keep "poking the dog". Now it's likely they will get people from their group to come from all over the nation, and maybe with some real bad asses in the group. If we end up with a big group here and lots of violence, the hippies have ownership in that violence.

There may be a lot of education on this blog, but not much common sense.

»

So all of us who responded to

So all of us who responded to Neo-Nazis in town, including those of us who gathered at Sylvester park peacefully, who stood watch in support of potential targets, who were in the crowd of people eventually at the Olympian, are hippies.

Hippies = bad

These bad hippies are the reason why Neo-Nazis will return to Olympia.

In fact, the variety of voices here on this local blog will also cause the Nazis to be violent.

So, should we eradicate hippies? Should we pass a law that prevents a variety of voices from expression on a blog such as this?

Such power these hippies have, they singlehandedly give motivation and hope to the lonely attention starved Nazis.

But wait a moment. Right now, I feel as if I am talking with a calm Jim Ramm. Because a whole helluva lotta assumptions are being made. The messengers and targets are being blamed for the behavior of bullies. Labels are being tossed around. Scapegoats are being lined up in advance.

»

You seem agitated Sarah. I ha

You seem agitated Sarah. I happen to agree with White Feather, w/o all the hippy labeling perhaps. However, I do think that the counter-protest only eggs them on. And it doesn't do a think to stop their electronic recruiting.

The real battle against hate is in the home and in the school.

The golden rule still applies here. Just because the nazi's are severely lacking in moral and ethical principles doesn't give us the go-ahead to hate on them.

»

Rob, I'm not sure what to do

Rob, I'm not sure what to do with "You seem agitated Sarah.". I hear this as "Stop it, Sarah". What do you mean?
»

I think this whole thing is a

I think this whole thing is affecting you negatively. That's what I mean. Your interpretation of "stop it" is wrong. I think that the monitoring of these guys can become obsessive. I see several posts every day from you about this issue. I don't think that's healthy.

[edit] And honestly, yes it bothers me. It also bothers me how much energy these guys have garnered. I think their attention is undeserved.

Please compare their actions to those of an Internet "Troll."

What do you think of that?

»

Rob, really, did I ask you fo

Rob, really, did I ask you for your opinion on my own health? (insert smile here) You certainly can have an opinion, but my instinct is to gently encourage you to back off a bit.

Most any activity can become obsessive. Many individuals and groups monitor hate groups in a healthy fashion. Because the material we deal with is intense and traumatic, we naturally have to take good care of ourselves and each other. I myself am doing fine.

I'd rather we look at the themes we are discussing rather than on what we think of the writer, I need to remember this myself also. Play the ball, not the man.

»

It would be nice if you had s

It would be nice if you had some evidence to support your claims. However, my reading is that all evidence is to the contrary. The reason that Nazis target liberal communities is not because they get a rise out of us, it is because they can. The general atmosphere in this country (perpetuated by your reference to "hippies") is that liberal values are somehow out of the mainstream. If you would like to learn more about this, please read ALL of Dave Neiwert's excellent blog Orcinus. Start here.

If you would like to see some "hippies" up close and personal, you can come over to dinner at my house. You can meet me, my family, and I'll introduce you to a few of my friends. You might have a different opinion by the end of the evening. If you choose not to accept my invitation, please refrain from the name calling.

»

If this is indeed a Jim Ramm

If this is indeed a Jim Ramm quote, I think it might be illuminating about their motivations (i.e. to incite aggravated response and provoke direct reaction):
Expect more racialist flyers and more nazi rallies. Please protest us! We enjoy the conflict. I been doing some thinking...Even if I didn't believe in fascism I would still promote it.

Why? Because it's the most powerful tool I have to piss people off.

The best thing in the world is to upset a crowd to the point they riot and watch them go to jail for it!
Now that's entertainment!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
Jim Ramm NSM Northwest

»

Counterdemonstration does not

Counterdemonstration does not have to include conflict. That's the whole point of using humor. We don't have to buy into their game of escalation -- we can protest in our own way.
»

Intention is one thing, reali

Intention is one thing, reality is another. Just because a group plans a civil protest doesn't mean rabble rousers won't show up and possibly drag otherwise humorous or peaceful people into the fray.

My point is simply that directly counterprotesting them may not be the most effect or assertive activity.

»

So we agree on one thing: you

So we agree on one thing: you can't control all the people. Some folks will show up whether you plan a counterdemonstration or not. So what would you rather have, an event where the ONLY message is conflict (small group of Nazis fighting with larger, unorganized group of protesters), or an event where the message is "look at the funny nazis" in which the vast majority of folks are parading in costumes, playing kazoos and dancing? I prefer the latter. Ideally we could organize an event, a la Procession of the Species, that is so engaging and fun that no one pays much attention to the real Nazis.
»

Jim Ramm also counsels people

Jim Ramm also counsels people on how to be Ghost Skins and he prides himself on being one himself. A Ghost Skin is all about deception.

Does the fact that a Nazi enjoys what he is doing mean I and others should not stand up as another voice? Should we all go quiet while the Nazis enjoy themselves?

I don't see this as an either-or proposition. Either stay home and quiet or show up and get baited into acting out and be jailed. There really is a whole range of possibilities and strategies.

»

That's why I am listening to

That's why I am listening to my gut concerning this isse. And my gut instinct says that Ramm et al. are aiming to disrupt, distract, aggravate and provoke this community. To some degree thus far, they have been successful.
»

If my hippie label has offend

If my hippie label has offended, that wasn't my intention......I thought it was a rather innocuous label. And I don't want to get off topic here, but many of the things said in the "write your caption" thread were much worse than my using the hippie term. In the 60's and 70's the term hippie was almost an endearing term.

I just hope this community doesn't feel a much bigger pain from these Nazi's, because of the counter-group (there, no hippie label). I personally believe the community should have ignored them. If they continued and amped up, then the community could respond in force. But when you go 0-100 out of the gate, it plays into their hand, and leaves little room to amp up if they do. And I hate that the reaction of some have essentially empowered them.

»

I appreciate what you have to

I appreciate what you have to say. All language is about how you use it, and I also think of "hippie" as a positive term. It depends on the way it is used however, and I was hearing a lot of discounting in what you said. Thanks for clarifying.

I think that we're not locked into a conventional response, however. As Sarah said, there are lots of possible responses. I believe that this community could respond in a creative manner that would leave the Nazis dazed and confused, while at the same time transforming the whole event from one of hate and confrontation to one of humor and solidarity.

»

I hope you and Sarah are corr

I hope you and Sarah are correct, and I'm wrong. I guess we will see soon enough.
»

I'm surprised at how relaxed

I'm surprised at how relaxed people seem to feel about the NSM targeting Olympia. My husband and I watched a documentary about a similar group on A&E a few nights ago - the image of the young man talking about how he didn't get along with his father but he could feel at home with the white power group and looked at the leader as a father figure really hit home with us. My husband is a teacher at a public high school and he sees kids that could easily be that boy on a daily basis. He told me it frightened him to think about how many kids can be swayed into a group like that with talk of "family" and the such. I think our response to the NSM needs to be precise and to the point - I also think that can happen on many different levels from educating our community to a counter demonstration. Ignoring them doesn't make them go away - it just gives them that extra protection of people in our community being ignorant to their presence and motives. Hate groups like these are growing and I can't help but wonder if it's in part because so many people think that if they ignore it that they'll just disappear. I think that people need to stand up and say that this is not okay. And I would hope that no one would blame the NSM coming here on the people who are speaking up and saying that this is unacceptable.
»

I notice that much of the adv

I notice that much of the advice to "ignore the NSM" or alternatively, to "respect their First Amendment Rights" assumes that the message of the Nazis - while repugnant - is somehow neutral. That it is merely another point on a continuum of opinion. That the expression of their views is within bounds and acceptable, as long as they are not actually physically violent.

As someone who has read extensively the history of Nazi camps in the 1930's and 1940's, I assert that their message is anything BUT neutral. I might have a right to political free speech, but I don't have the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theatre. I argue that shouting "6 Billion More" on the streets of Olympia is less political speech than hate speech. It's like shouting "kike" in a synagogue, or shouting "nigger" in a Baptist Church. You can say all you want about the NSM following the law, but if I went around talking in graphic terms about killing the Bush Administration, I'd have an interview with a Secret Service agent really soon. When the NSM says they would kill a man (in my presence) for being gay, that is not neutral. That is assault. It happened within earshot of several police officers, who did nothing to confront it - because they were sorely outnumbered and needed to keep as much order as they could.

The same could be said of the other side; I heard more than one shout of "death to the Nazis." I heard several people shouting things which would embarass me, if I had said them. One man shouted "pussies! pussies!" over and over at the Nazis. The definition of clueless, in a town which invented the image of the Riot Grrrl...

The request to ignore them is not going to be accepted by many of us. Someone is going to be confronting them, and that confrontation is likely to be hateful. But we _should_ hate the Nazis' politics - it is the politics of factories eating surplus workers, literally starving them to death while extracting the last of their labor from them at the same time. It is not just white "pride." It is not a mirror version of black nationalism. It is a genocidal impulse, explicitly stated.

Our tactics, even after all of this, should be to silently shadow their movements, and use our voices to sing or ridicule them rather than shout assaults. But we should NOT be absent from their venue, if we have any notion that they will be somewhere. They have to be challenged. They are the trial balloon for what the Bush Admin wants to do with those camps you heard about in the news recently. We already have a prison population - per capita - larger than Nazi Germany in 1944-45. Larger than the USSR ever. Larger than China now. Largest in Human History. And we have camps, too - labor camps, for first time nonviolent drug offenders and 'troubled youth.' The camps in Germany started much the same way, for exacly the same reasons. We are already closer to being the Third Reich in this country than most are willing to admit.

»

Drew: I notice that much o

Drew:
I notice that much of the advice to "ignore the NSM" or alternatively, to "respect their First Amendment Rights" assumes that the message of the Nazis - while repugnant - is somehow neutral. That it is merely another point on a continuum of opinion. That the expression of their views is within bounds and acceptable, as long as they are not actually physically violent.

Where specifically did you notice this? I think you're mis-understanding here, Drew.

Their message is repugnant and vile. I think I have made my opinion 100% clear in my communication about this issue.

The issues for me here is whether "we" get sidetracked from other important work, into a hyped up, (possibly obsessive) response to "them." The other issue is whether our response somehow benefits them - either by lending them credibility or by somehow empowering them or by getting them increased media attention from the confrontational display.

And in terms of recruitment, perhaps some racist sympathizers will be rallied to their sides, when they see their white supremacist buddies being "threatened" by "lefties."

Has anyone thought about that? Confrontation leads to greater media hype, which leads to sympathetic racists coming to the aid of the NSM'ers. I think that it's something to think about.

»

Sorry, but you seem to have t

Sorry, but you seem to have taken offense at what I wrote. I did not mean to suggest you agreed with their message, I suggested that you advocated allowing them to express it. (many have, on the Olympian forums as well as here) I'm arguing that sometimes communities - not the government, but citizens directly - have to stop speech which is advocating genocidal policies. This is better than waiting to resist genocide when it happens.

Your fellow progressives will decide for themselves whether to consider confrontation to be "sidetracking." We each set our own priorities, as it should be. Many if not most of us will be working on anti-racist community building anyway, so you'd be better served to focus on that rather than hammering on those of us who WILL confront the Nazis. Many different tactics will be tried - we have to allow them the space to coexist, and evaluate what works and what does not work, from direct experience. I might add that we have many disagreements about what actually happened, as well. If we want to make progress here, we could discuss just what we think happened on January 22nd.

It would help me accept your arguments if you could drop the language in which you evaluate the mental health of your fellow progressives. To say that anyone is being 'obsessive' is marginalizing and unfair, given that you are not a doctor... stick to the ideas, don't evaluate our motives or mental health in terms of your own values.

Have any of us thought about nonconfrontation? Sure - but we have come down on the other side of the issue, Rob. I wonder why it is that you have not felt heard on this... you've made and made and made your point, in writing, in several forums. We do not agree with nonconfrontation. We are serving our values in the way which we feel is correct, and we lodge responsibility for the NSM's actions where it belongs - with them. We are no more responsible for their actions than you are responsible for ours.

»

Closer to the Third Reich tha

Closer to the Third Reich than we want to admit? You can launch into another thread about that one because I would love to discuss.
»

Drew, although I disagreed wi

Drew, although I disagreed with it, your post had credibility until the last paragraph. Are you saying the Bush administration is some how supporting the Nazi movement in this country??

Mad Housewife, the Nazi's don't need to come to town to get your kids. All they need is MIA parents, crappy home life, lack of supervision, the internet, the TV, the radio, and they have them. The same way gangs get your kids, the same way, druggies get your kids, the same way pedophiles get your kids. Yes I agree it is better if the Nazi's don't come here. We had a few wimpy, low level Nazi's come visit, we overreacted, and now we may get the heavy hitters. And they may be here longer, with more time to make contact with the kids who are adrift. I believe the hippies hearts were in the right place, but I really believe it was a tactical error to engage the little group like they did. Time will tell.

»

I've studied the forfeiture l

I've studied the forfeiture laws of the United States in comparison with the Nuremburg laws of the early Nazi state - and they have many parallels. I've studied the Nazi camps, and the "boot camps" we have for first time drug offenders - there are many parallels there, as well. I've seen the United States support dictatorships throughout the history of the 20th (and now 21st) centuries, and the common thread always seems to be: what's profitable for American Empire, screw democracy, screw the rule of international law. VERY parallel to Nazi Germany, in my opinion.

Time does not allow me to go into great length, but I could suggest you visit this review of a book on the subject for example. I have not read this book, but I wrote a couple of papers with the same thesis when I was in college.

»

"VERY parallel to Nazi German

"VERY parallel to Nazi Germany, in my opinion."

You know what they say about opinions, Drew. I think your doing a little 1+2 and coming up with 15.

Well college boy, The Fire, what say you on Drew's assessment?

»

I think it's a stretch, which

I think it's a stretch, which is why I wanted to discuss it.

I assume Drew is against the government seizure of private property for drug offenses. I agree with him and even take it a step further, wondering why government has been allowed to strip away a guarantee (the Second Amendment) for domestic violence convictions?

This would be like telling someone they have surrendered their First Amendment guarantees because they have been found guilty of perjury.

So if there's an argument about government growing too big, that's valid. Does it resemble the Third Reich? If you wanted to really believe it, I can see how one could convince themselves.

The reason I don't agree with it, though, is because when such a statement is made one is implying we are an evil country. There are about a gagillion other examples one could give which are more accurate and far less inflammatory.

For instance, Drew cited the number of people we currently have in incarceration. The examples of a lower population were Nazi Germany, the USSR, and today's China. By using these examples, a reader would assume people in US prisons are there because of similar tactics (re: corrupt judicial system).

But does anyone really here think that the American judicial system is corrupt? I mean, even if you believe that the system is inherently unfair, the step to judicial corruption is quite a case to make.

Long story short, you have to look at why and how, not just the end result.

»

I can't help but be reminded

I can't help but be reminded of the racial breakdowns in prisons today. The vast majority of inmates are black and hispanic. One can't, in my opinion, reasonably say that this is so because blacks and hispanics are "bad people", that would be ridiculous. So, in my mind, we do have to consider what systemically is going on to cause this. I'm not going to go as far as saying that the justice system is overtly corrupt, but I will say that the scales of justice are not balanced for all. I think it is a form of racism which is uncontrollable to a degree. Malcom Gladwell talked about this subconscious racism in his book "Blink". He explains that he and many other black men and women who were given certain word association tests displayed prejudice towards black people on a subconscious level. Now, after reading this, I came to the conclusion that if this was the case for them, when they have to live with the effects of it, it must true for us all. My point is that the justice system, while maybe not corrupt, is definetly not fair to minority groups because of this social conditioning which has planted this seed in us. I don't want to sound like a big brother conspiracy freak, because that's not my point. I'm merely trying to highlight the fact that our prison system is not very good. True, they are not political prisoners by standard definition, but in a broader sense, they are most certainly political prisoners.
»

white feather: I'm trying to

white feather: I'm trying to understand this better. Why exactly are you writing Drew off? Knowing what I know, it seems like a reasonable conclusion, perhaps not absolutely right, but Drew never said the two were "exactly parallel", he said, "very parallel".

(You also did this thing where you dismissed his opinion and then state your opinion expecting to be heard, and taken seriously. As soon as you write somebody off like that, communication stops, because nobody wants to listen to someone who's not listening them.)

»

I think people are only going

I think people are only going to forget just how bad living under people like Hitler and Stalin were.

The first article in Foreign Affairs for January/February is "Failing the Stalin Test." In it the authors describe how over half (56 percent) of Russians describe Stalin as "having done more good than bad." Hell, 30 percent of Russians 30 and over said they would "definately or probably" vote for Stalin if he ran in an election today.

So really it shouldn't come as a surprise that some might consider the US to be "very parallel" to Nazi Germany.

I think it's a wreckless comparison but that's just me.

»

I don't think any comparison

I don't think any comparison is wreckless, if one is trying to isolate trends. Perhaps the behavior of the Nazis' was much worse than we've seen here so far, but if by drawing these comparisons we are able to realize that we're heading that direction and can put a stop to it, then that's our responsibility. I personally try to never make the same mistake twice, as a country we should try not to let history repeat itself, however doomed we are to that in some opinions.
»

Rob, I'm guessing you are

Rob,

I'm guessing you are talking about my comment about "you know what they say about opinions". That was an attempt at humor and I see why that was not the best attempt after re-reading it. It would be nice to have some emotioncons to convey that better here.

I still believe Drew took 1+2 and got 15 with his analysis. Fire said it more elloquently than me though.

»

i didn't mean to seem judgmen

i didn't mean to seem judgmental.
»

Rob, parallel is parallel.

Rob, parallel is parallel.

It just is.

There is no sort of parallel. It either is or isn't.

»

Although train tracks may app

Although train tracks may appear to intersect far into the distance (this is due to the optical phenomenon known as "perspective") they actually don't. Therefore, they are parallel.
»

It's sort of like saying, "Th

It's sort of like saying, "That's somewhat unique." - How can something be somewhat "unique?" It either is, or it isn't.

food for thought. I'm smiling too.

»

I understand your point. H

I understand your point.

However, I am not a literalist. I don't believe that everything a person says should be taken word for word. I don't think, based on my interpretation of what Drew wrote, that he meant things are as bad now as they were under Hitler. What I got from it was that there are identifiable patterns in the two which lead Drew to the conclusion that we need to be paying attention to what's going on right now, because if we don't, we're heading toward a bad situation.

I'm not going to say that Bush is Hitler, but I will say that he's got some Hitler tendencies.

»

No problem, like I said when

No problem, like I said when I re-read it, it did have an edge if you can't see my face, hear my voice etc.

But with that said, I can have passion on certain topics, and hopefully that style won't cause a problem. Nothing has hit my passion spot yet, but when it does hold on. :)

»

It is probably a miracle that

It is probably a miracle that any of us can communicate via the web, since we can't see each other's expressions etc., does make things much more problematic.:)

As for passion, I hear you on that. Folks who read Oly Blog have probably figured out what one of my passions are by now.

»

Here is (in their own words)

Here is (in their own words) what the NSM wants from a rally: note that I have edited it just a little, for one word. You can guess the word I am sure. _____________________________________________________ Everett Wa. Racial Awareness Rally A few of those whom attended (picture of 5 men taken by a 6th person) Seattle area Racial Patriots took to the streets on 3/5/06 to help educate the white race. NSM Units converged on the Everett Events Center located on Broadway: a very busy downtown street. NSM Patriots held their ground for 1.5 hours with no protesters, a few of onlookers and police. Not one anti-racist was present. Thousands of cars flew by and saw Swastika flags flying high in the air. Some people did flipped us off but a refreshing number Seig Heiled from their automobiles. We met three skinheads from the Everett area whom wanted to join the NSM. One filthy N*&&er threatened to murder us. Of course he wouldn't attack all by himself but instead threatened to get his fellow chimps to kill us. He was quite the cowardly groid. Come get some! The Everett White Unity gathering was one of our best rallies. Images to be posted soon. http://www.nukeisrael.com/seattleprotest/Everett.htm ______________________________________________________ Note that this was "one of our best rallies." and that "Not one anti-racist was present." So that must mean that they want us to ignore them. Just like the Olympian suggests we do... Hmmm.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Olyblogger of the Month:

decorabilia

Sponsored by:

Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are:

Rob Richards
Interests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism.

emmettoconnell
Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum.

enpen
Interests: OlyBlog calendar, Oly street art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff.

Robert Whitlock
Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment

Rick
Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons.

Nazis come to OlyWa: A history (so far)

Get Firefox!

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter