Some facts about life: 1.) 6 billion people can only provide ten thousand years of life on earth because humans have a maximum population-expansion growth rate that does not allow for millions of years to exist inside of just 6 billion people. For instance "Lucy" would've lived for 80 years before reproducing offspring that lived for 80 years and reproduced again and that extremely slow rate creates an exponential maximum amount of time of just 20 thousand years. However, humans actually die much faster than that rate so really only 10 thousand years can be squeezed inside of our current population of 6 B people. Simply study trig to plug in an exponential maximum rate of human population expansion (r) to go backwards in time to find the maximum number of years that can be squeezed into our current population. Plus, if there were billions more than 6B people (which might allow for just one million years to fit inside our population) there would be millions more skeletons preserved deep in the soil. Yet the fossil record has been fully staked-out and all the remains have been located and there are FAR FEWER skeletons of all kinds to fill even just thirty thousand years. That is precisely why Darwin totally recalled natural selection as a means of macro-evolution because there was not nearly enough fossils to allow natural selection to be an adequate path towards the random evolution from monkey to man (macro-evolution). It seems that man pretty much evolved correctly the first time around which also provides a huge barrier to stuffing more than 20 thousand years into humans' existance. 2.) The human tailbone is not a "useless" leftover of monkeys' conversion to man because the human tailbone is connected to muscles that help humans defecate and without a tailbone all of a sudden it is extremely difficult to defecate. Every organ in the human body has an important, interconnected role whether it's for immuntity or defacation. Human hips are extremely different from chimp hips and we have never seen a conversion between the two. Lucy was actually a chimp with in-bent knees that died real early because it was a deformity. No deformity has ever helped any species get stronger, but in many many cases deformity has lead to early death which puts more barriers into creating more than ten thousand years out of human existence. 3.)Micro-evolution is part of what keeps each unique species in existance as its own unique species. For instance, peppered moths can be either black or white depending on the background (micro-evolution). That is a built-in defense tactic that existed before the trees in Europe were covered with the black soot, and that built-in defense tactic created more moths...not more half-moths-half-monkeys. Micro evolution keeps each species alive and in no way possible has micro-evolution ever lead to the massive cellular change that would be required to convert an ape into a human. Another good example of micro-evolution is viruses which have the pre-built ability to "evolve", yet we are still left with just viruses. No new species has ever been created as a result of viruses evolving because virus-evolution leads to MORE VIRUSES and NOT new species. More viruses leads to more death...NOT NEW SPECIES. Micro-evolution is an amazing prebuilt defense tactic that keeps each species alive. Micro-evolution does not automatically lead to Macro-Evolution. In fact, while we have many many examples of micro-evolution preserving species, we have NO, NOTTA, ZIP EXAMPLES OF OBSERVABLE MACRO-EVOLUTION. In fact the gap from micro to macro evolution has no basis in observable testable and retestable science. In fact to assume that micro automatically leads to macro over time is really really poor science considering that no scientific evidence supports that assumption whatsoever. I challenge anybody reading this to demonstrate the cellular pathway that is required to get apes to start converting into totally different species. Think about it...there is an observable cellular pathway for everything that is observable on earth, yet we have never seen a cellular pathway that is capable of converting monkey brain into human brain and so forth. 4.) Why is Earth the only planet nearby with observable life? Randomly creating "life" requires millions of specific elements to combine in a very specific sequence and it seems that Earth was "tailor-made" to provide life the first time around. What else even comes close? Why are there no observable inbetween-"Earths"? Why supposedly have A COUPLE of observable inbetween-humans (even though lucy and bigfoot are their own unique species)been observed but no inbetween "Earths". That's odd considering that out of twenty trillion different random combinations of elements only one combination created Earth. Is life random or was Earth "designed" specifically for life? The evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the latter, yet so-called scientists continue to assume that the millions of "missing-links" that complete the puzzle really exist somewhere. Maybe, but why are we so fast to assume the impossible over a simpler idea?. 5.)The entire Earth was populated with cities and civilization at the same time that Africa had civilizations. White-man DID NOT SETTLE AMERICA; huge cities of navtive tribal-societies existed in America WAY BEFORE COLUMBUS. Native tribes from Ancient Celtic Europe visited America way before 1942. Each continent has it's own unique group of people and to blindly assume that Africans were "first" has no basis in observable science. First-to-last mentality prevents us from observing the whole picture. If multiverses exist simultaneously than how come multi-races cannot exist simultaneoulsy? Life is a continuous circle and not a race down a straight line. Life is not linear. It's not about first or last, it's about simultaneous existance. While the whole multi-verse may have a "starting-point" in time, all of the atomic particles needed to create every creature and every race simultaneously existed from the "beginning" so it seems contradictory to assume a linear path. Speaking of a linear path as bogus science consider this: Supposedly the human brain alone took millions of years to evolve. First humans had just a medulla-oblongota (supposedly). Ask your biology teacher how a primitive human might survive with just a medulla-oblongota in the primitive wild!!! Do you know what the medulla can do? Nearly nothing without the cerebral cortex! A human with just a medulla is caiman-fodder to say the least. A human without a cerebral cortex cannot think, remember, see, hear, innovate, let alone raise babies in a cave surrounded by fully-evolved primitive beasts with night-vision and extremely sensitive ears and heat sensors. How can you have sex without being able to think or see? Lets say you are so fortunate as to actually capture food in that state....if you set that food down you will never remember where you left it and without vision you will never find the cave again and your wife will leave you if you don't bring home the bacon (where's home again?)....but then again the wife has no idea where you are or who you are or what your name is or anything...except what you smell like, and humans' sense of smell sucks compared to all the other primitive species. A human without a cerebral cortex is scientifically incapable of reproducing which means that humans' had to have evolved with the whole brain or no brain at all. That strongly supports the idea that everything that exists now existed simultaneously from the "beginning". Granted, there may well have been a "big bang" starting point, but to then assume that we also know the order of the species is quite the leap.

So, I guess you're saying, "everything is everything". Words don't do much, but we got these yappers for some damn reason. I try not use mine much. Instead of talking in circles, I prefer to smoke weed.