I think this is just as plausible as the official report. I've read more on this demolition theory, an engineer/professor from BYU wrote a scientific report on this topic and it was very interesting.

Typically, when an event occurs, say, between two people, there are going to be two stories of what happened. The more witnesses or participants involved the more stories there are going to be. All of these stories are very true for each person, but not always completely factual. I like to try to stick to a point somewhere in the middle. A lot of times that's where the real story is.

Interesting video. I had seen a short before regarding a missile possibly being used on the Pentagon but nothing about the WTC.

Is all of this possible? Definately. Do I think the government would go this far? To stay sane, no, I don't think they would.

If, and we're talking a real, real, long-shot, this turned out to be true, the ramifications would be unbelieveable for all of us. It would be in all of our interests that this is simply a conspiracy theory.

We'll see how much leg this has. The good conspiracies stick around because they're both plausible and the public thinks they're true. Like the Man on the Grassy Knoll. It's been around for so long because very few people actually think Oswald acted alone (or, for that matter, knew other people were involved).

Yeah, the film was interesting and presented very well. As for their argument, I don't believe it. It's not to say our government couldn't pull it off, I just don't think they would need to do this to get where the producer/director thought they needed to go.

Thanks Rick for fixing my link. If you are so inclined, a PM on how to do it correctly in the future would be appreciated.

This video has been around for a while now. I don't know exactly how long. The most intruiging part for me was the testimony of the firefighters, who described the buildings falling like they were controlled demos. pop pop pop pop pop