Olympia's Nuclear Free Zone (NFZ) threatened

Navigation

User login

Online users

stevenl
Laurian
oldtimeydave

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

shadowclad_warrior
Lisa P
GRuB
ktcoxster
making a differ...

Olympia's Nuclear Free Zone (NFZ) threatened

Submitted by Keith Hufnagel on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 11:44pm.

I am saddened to read that the NFZ ordinance might soon be repealed. The ordinance imposes no harm, and it opens discussions between a few nuclear-armed countries and Olympia. Those discussions might not occur without the ordinance. Olympia continues to do business with corporations that are invested in nuclear despite the ordinance. The port of Olympia continues to accept US military shipments despite the ordinance. The bombing of Japan helped China grow to become one of the most successful communist nations and enabled Indonesia to become a muslim haven despite the ordinance. Meanwhile the US economy is declining and the attitude towards nuclear weapons is softening. Why? What are the implications of repealing the NFZ? How can this be good? I challenge supporters of repealing the NFZ to show the statistics that demonstrate why the repeal is financially or statistically warranted.

Keith Hufnagel's blog
Login or register to post comments

it opens discussions between

Submitted by The Fire Inside on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 2:56am.

it opens discussions between a few nuclear-armed countries and Olympia.

Out of curiosity, what country has "open[ed] discussion" with Olympia about nuclear technology?

I challenge supporters of repealing the NFZ to show the statistics that demonstrate why the repeal is financially or statistically warranted.

I don't think there's any evidence that the ordinance has stopped anything, either. It was an enormous waste of air to discuss it in the first place and it's more of the same trying to repeal it.

The City of Olympia is the wrong venue for this.

Pakistan

Submitted by Keith Hufnagel on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:28am.

I believe Pakistan replied to the city of Olympia regarding our NFZ. I am not sure what was stated, but that fact alone should keep the ordinance "on the books". I don't think anything about discussions between Pakistan and Olympia is a waste of air, but I do think that it would be a waste of air to repeal the NFZ since it's not costing taxpayers anything and it's business as usual at the port anyways. One could argue that Olympia's refusal to do business with sweatshops doesn't actually stop sweatshops from existing and that private individuals who buy sweatshop goods from cheap US stores are encouraging sweatshops despite Olympia's ordinance against sweatshops, but that's not the point. The point of the ordinance is to have a voice of the people and for the people that recognizes that perhaps nuclear weapons are not favored by the people (even if they worked or didn't work in Japan). I am more concerned what message we would be sending on behalf of our people to the middle east by repealing the measure. Now that the ordinance is on the books the burden of proof should be on the council to demonstrate why the ban needs to be repealed (other than claiming that it doesn't work). Yet, those in control tend to be good at inappropriately shifting the burden of proof.

Interesting Points

Submitted by Bert on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 7:11am.

Good morning,

Your point about the bombing enabling China is a little suspect. Yes, without the bombing Russia would have gained a much greater influence in East Asia. That might have hampered China's growth. But it also might not have. I would be interested to hear more of your reasoning behind that.

http://olyblog.net/olympias-nuclear-free-zone-nfz-threatened#new

I am proposing that as a

Submitted by Keith Hufnagel on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:06am.

I am proposing that as a result of Japan leaving Indonesia, Taiwan, and other Pacific Islands (which resulted from our bombings), China was able to gain more control of Asia. Now Indonesia is split between the Chinese and the Native Indonesians, and China will not allow independence in Taiwan. Russia might not have been a major influence because their government seems to lack the discipline and people control that have enabled China to have an extremely strong, disciplined, and growing economy over the last 70 years.

bombing of Japan effect on China

Submitted by Bert on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 4:51pm.

Yes, but Japan was basically defeated before the bombing.

People like to claim that the bombing saved American lives that would have been lost fighting a protracted island to island guerilla warfare. But that probably isn't the case.

It makes more sense that the bombing was designed to have an effect. It was to let the world know the destructive potential of the US arsenal, and more importantly, it was designed to cut off Russia from sharing in the spoils of a conquered Japan. It can be argued that the US has benefited tremendously as a result of its patriarchal status over Japan during the last 60 odd years.

The bombing was "shock and awe" - quintessential disaster capitalism.

My take on Nuke Free Zones

Submitted by The Original Yoda on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:48am.

Growing up in the 80s during the height of the fear of nuclear war, my hometown (Des Moines, Iowa) was a nuke free zone. What effect did it have? Very little I'm sure except that it was maybe a message to the folks in Russia that we loved our children, too (thinkin' Sting, here).

I met a foreign exchange student from Japan a few years ago. Junko or "Beverly" and I used to drunkenly wander around the old olywa building neighborhood at night. As we talked across our language barriers (she spoke some english and I spoke no Japanese) we eventually had to come to the "we dropped 2 atom bombs on you country" conversation.

I apologized and we both cried. Some kind of grassroots, next-generation diplomacy.

That's it.

Peace.

The city should be focused

Submitted by Norm on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 12:37pm.

The city should be focused on other things. This is my opinion, there is no statistic to support it, and frankly I don't think it needs one.

If someone wants a nuclear free world they need to lobby the people who have control over that, not the local city council.

It's going down, taking this to the council and trying to sway them will change nothing. Once the ordinance goes away, it will change nothing, besides upsetting TJ and some other very vocal people.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at: