|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 15 users and 118 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 6:46pm.
[via Portland Indymedia]
![]()
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events Port of Olympia Action |
My God
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 6:53pm.There are little children there being coerced into standing in front of trucks and babies on mom's shoulders forced to be a party to this? That's insane.
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
Insane is a good word
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 10:34pm.Benefit of the doubt
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 7:06pm.I went to one of those Tough Gloves amateur boxing matches in Tacoma once because a friend was entered and saw parents with kids of all ages there. That sort of glorification of violence is way worse in my opinion than bringing kids to a peace rally.
but that is another subject . . .
Submitted by rebecca on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 7:38pm.I think the difference would be that in a boxing match, they would be observing only and the "violence" is contained --- you pretty much know who's going to get beat up (the contestants) and who's not (the audience). And the kids belong to the latter group. Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to argue the merits or dismerits of boxing. I'm not saying that if and when I have kids, I'd take them to see a match. But there is an important distiction between that and taking kids to an event where by their presence, they are a participants.
My take is that it depends on the nature of the protest, level of action expected, and anticipated potential consequences - plus the purpose of having the child present, what alternatives are available (child care, etc.), and maybe some other factors. Bringing a kid to a relatively low key even where you're standing on the side-walk holding signs is one thing. Putting a kid in the middle of a direct action is another.
Frankly, the first time I watched the clip, I didn't even notice the kid. I hope that if the situation had escalated, the child would have been escorted to safety first thing.
One more point on the comparison to boxing matches --- something isn't good because soemthing else is worse.
You're right
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 7:44pm.Wow. I haven't checked the
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 9:44am.Wow. I haven't checked the internet in a couple of days and I was floored when I went to The Olympian's page with a headline declaring "Protesters stop military transport, delay work."
I'm trying to bounce around from thread to thread and stay specific to each one, so I'll jump into this one.
Bringing your kid to a street rally?
In my opinion, the logic behind bringing your child to the Port of Olympia in order to physically stop a military movement is no different than our enemies who hide among the general population. Each is a guerilla tactic designed to neutralize law enforcement and military strength.
If you want to battle it out in the street, battle it out in the street. But don't bring people incapable of making that decision on their own to the frontline.
TFI, I expect better of you.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 9:57am.Seriously, I don't think it's any of my business where someone takes their kids. If I see in person someone putting a child in danger, I'd say something. These pictures don't show anybody in danger. The truck is stopped in the one and the kids are beside the truck in the other, not in front. Those trucks don't turn sharp enough to be much danger to those kids. In the photo of the kid eating sitting in front of the truck, the driver of the truck is not even in the truck. I think he's one of the people standing and talking near the rear of the truck.
I just think we should give the parents the benefit of the doubt. Besides, knowing the protester types that I know, if people raise a stink about it, more people will bring their kids in defiance.
The Tactics
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:09am.Just comparing the tactics being used.
At the Port of Olympia the tactic is on a smaller and far less violent level than in the Middle East, but it's a guerilla tactic nonetheless. The end result is to reduce and eliminate any advantage the better equipped, trained, professional force has.
In Olympia it's the police department. In the Middle East, the U.S. Armed Forces.
So, apologies for using an over-exaggerated comparison. I was just a little fired up after reading the article and watching the posted video on another thread.
I suppose it was the whole "I will never accept defeat"-part of the Soldier's Creed that got to me.
Apology accepted.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:37am.As an analysis of tactics, I still think you're wrong. I think your analysis gives the protester undue credit. You assume the protesters purposefully brought the kids so that the police could not attack, I don't think it was that thought out.
But don't bring people
Submitted by DC on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:16am.
But don't bring people incapable of making that decision on their own to the frontline.I already mentioned I went to Christian School as a child, and I'm drawing a strange parallel between children down at the port and my early expierences with church.
I really didn't have a say in where my parents took me every Sunday, to participate and be indoctorinated into a belief system I don't agree with as an adult. But as a child my parents wanted to teach me about what was important to them. They had that right. And so the the parents down at the protests.
With that being said...
Submitted by DC on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:21am.Right...
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:22am.But at least keep your kid on the sidewalk.
Just how much of the protesting experience do you want your kid to have?
And then when you're right in the mix and something does happen to Lil' Johnny, who's going to be responsible then?
Somehow I doubt the parents are going to want to shoulder the responsibility for the physical aspect of civil disobedience.
My money is on the kid and incident being used for propaganda.
Training or Endangering?
Submitted by rebecca on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:37am.It's pretty safe and easy...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:49am....to go check it out. AND, it's important that the wider community witnesses what is happening. The more perspectives that we have about the events, the better we all understand them.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Silliness
Submitted by wilson on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 7:46pm.Yes
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 7:53pm.I don't think that law applies in this situation.
According to some people, downtown Olympia is dangerous, should I be charged with endangerment because my son and I walk around downtown together?
I see the family beside the truck not in front of it in the picture, obviously I can't tell from a photo what happened before or after but it looks like the truck is stopped at this point and the kids are safe.
Since You Mentioned It...
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 8:12pm.For the record, I am not Carol or anybody else calling for CPS to go to the Port!
Obviously we can't tell from the picture what happened before or after it was shot but... The child is close enough to the truck and protesters to be in harms way. If the truck driver were to take a hard left to get around the protesters, possibly not seeing the child, his life is endangered. Or knocking the baby from the mothers shoulders, endangers the child.
Both children are witnessing adults putting themselves in harms way. We teach our children to stay out of moving vehicles. What message is this mother sending her child by taking him down near the moving vechicle. (Either the Olympian or one poster here said the truck was moving very slowly)
Either way, since the ship has arrived, there have been issues arising at the port where children shouldn't be. Surely, this mother in the photos above was aware of the dangers of taking children down there prior to even taking them. She knowingly led her children near the path of a moving vehicle that had people trying to stop it with their bodies (imagine how a child would react to seeing a body rolled over and the consequent aftermath of that body being viewed by a child). If she couldn't get a sitter, she should have stayed home.
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
I think you're making a
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 8:41pm.I DO think the parent in the photo assessed the dangers before allowing their children that close to the action. Being old hat at protests, I can say with some confidence that I've never seen children that young put in grave danger, and that the rest of the crowd would be pressuring the parent to get the kids out of there if things got hairy. I understand your concern as a parent and I do the same kind of worrying sometimes, but I think, in this case, the kids are alright.
No splitting hairs
Submitted by wilson on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 8:02pm.Why bother?
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 8:59pm.Guys, this stuff is going back to Fort Lewis, give it a rest. Play your guitars and endanger your children somewhere else. If you are going to stage a protest that at best will get marginalized as the actions of a bunch of incoherent wackjobs who strew garbage in streets hoping to block the military at least do it when the stuff is GOING to Iraq, not COMING BACK. Jeez, but then again that's why you all have liberal arts degrees from Evergreen, instead of something useful? Go run for office and buy cigarettes and bath salts with donor money or something else.
Now...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 9:07pm....do you have something interesting to say?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
thank you security six
Submitted by wilson on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 9:16pm.Yeah I do
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 9:16pm.Hey People,
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 9:21pm.Conversation????
Submitted by grandma on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 9:37pm.All of the postings look like a conversation to me. Different viewpoints are represented, and people seem to feel free to express them on OlyBlog. Is there anything in the OlyBlog guidelines that says only a single viewpoint is welcome?
I agree with much of what security_six is saying. Using children as shields, spitting on police and troops, throwing garbage in the streets ... none of those types of actions inspire trust or help change opinions. Just the opposite.
Nothing productive will come of this protest. The war isn't going to end because of it. The crowd will eventually disburse or be disbursed. The shipments will get through. And the Port and OPD will have ended up wasting a bunch of money on police overtime that could have been spent on something else.
In The 3rd Picture
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 10:45pm.there is a young boy in brown with a red bandana eating something out of a red cup. He is clearly school aged and does not belong sitting in front of a moving semi in hopes of preventing it from reaching it's destination. He is clearly being put in danger by an adult who should know better.
In the pictures Rob posted, this boy & another small boy are shown positioned in front of the semi. A new baby is being laying across the lap of a woman sitting in the ground in another.
These are not the actions of a parent who values their children's lives or is attempting to teach them values. These parents are endangering their children's lives. A sane person would tell these children they belong in school even if these children begged them to go protest. They would also prevent these small children from sitting in front of a semi. A sane mother of a baby or small child who can't speak would be a responsible parent by getting a babysitter or staying home with their baby instead of sitting in front of a moving semi with it in their lap.
I can't & won't condone the actions of these parents.
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
Assumptions
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 10:52pm.So many assumptions, so few questions. It looks to me like the semi is stationary, and therefore not dangerous to anyone. Please think for a moment before making accusations and threatening to call cps.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
I Never Mentioned CPS
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:06pm.but do acknowledge it was mentioned by posters on the comments section.
Of course the truck looks stationary. It's in a still picture. But if you look at the shots Rob posted, the truck is in various positions, and it was stated by the protesters themselves the truck was moving forward as if trying to force them out of the way.
As a counselor, I can't believe you'd think placing a child in front of a truck, stationary or not, to prevent it from moving, would be OK.
What other questions do you think need to be asked in order to draw a resonable & logical conclusion where these children are concerned?
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
A child being part of a
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:22pm.The first question...
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:26pm....I would ask is: "Is that truck moving?" Because, as you note, it is a still picture, it is impossible to tell. Now, we can talk about what makes sense. I, as someone who works with families and children, haven't encountered many parents who would put their child in harms way. So, it seems unlikely that that is what was happening in the picture. What do you think?
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
I think the children are
Submitted by Ehver Green on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:30pm.So, I'll Ask a Question
Submitted by Ehver Green on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:28pm.Why can't I post. I love
Submitted by wilson on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:43pm.That's funny.
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 11:46pm.OK. You can post now.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Kids at protest
Submitted by grandma on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 5:40am.Too bad folks resorted to hiding behind their kids. That tactic won't do a thing to convince people that the action is a just one. For me, I'm appalled. I don't care if the truck is stationery, has been sitting there for hours, or was moving. Putting even one child front and center at a protest is irresponsible. I hope CPS is on scene today to remove children from such irresponsible parents.
Using kids as a shield, dumping garbage and litter on the site, spitting -- is this really the Olympia way? I'm ashamed. Since I'm not working this weekend, I had intended to head downtown and add my voice to those calling for an end to the war. No way will I go now and condone this sort of irresponsible, embarrasing behavior.
My, what big judgments you have, grandma!
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 7:28am.Why don't you go down there and talk to some of the people. Watch how they behave with their children. Ask them about how they feel having their kids there during the conflict. Then, you can report back and tell us whether it seems dangerous or abusive.
Jumping to such big conclusions from a few pictures is what seems irresponsible to me.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Judgments
Submitted by grandma on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 7:47am.Just stating our opinions?
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:09am.Is that why we're doing this? I thought it was so that we could learn something about our community through conversation. But it's hard to have a conversation with someone who's already made up their mind about everything. I'm just asking people to approach the issue with a little more openness, and not just opinions, judgments, or assumptions. That might mean doing some investigation, like going down and having a talk with these folks.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Openness, not stupidity
Submitted by Myshkin1984 on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 11:39am.Shall we stop taking out children to baseball games
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:09am.HUGE DIFFERENCE
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 11:59am.Norm, when was the last time I suggested your
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 1:18pm.Jim
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 6:24pm.The last time (before today) that I was down there, there was a handful of kids as the crowd got gassed. Instead of moving their children people screamed "Oh my God there's kids out here!". Parents are not always a good judge of the risks that they are taking. Kids should not be at protests, and comparing a protest to a damned baseball game is LAME.
Come on
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:27am.I don't see anything as dangerous as
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:33am.ummmmm
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:42am."Maybe"
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:46am.How about speculation based
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:49am.It's the same old story - Everywhere I go, I get slandered, Libeled, I hear words I never heard in the bible
Maybe you should go down...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:48am....and see for yourself.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Some of us
Submitted by Norm on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 12:02pm.well
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 8:57am.Sorry, we just disagree I guess
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 9:10am.suppose we can...
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 9:14am.I am always amazed at how
Submitted by OperaGirl on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 9:46am.I am always amazed at how loosely people throw the CPS card. There are many many choices that parents make every day that I personally think are dangerous and irresponsible but unless a child is being physically abused/neglected or whatnot I would never even think about CPS. I keep seeing people spank their kids in stores because they are "acting up"... I think it's apalling and a lazy parenting choice. Should I call CPS? There are kids whose parents bring them McDonald's to school every day for lunch...I feel that it is dangerous to feed your kids that crap. Should I call CPS? There are choices that I make in parenting that I know people disagree with (extended breastfeeding, cosleeping when they were babies, etc) and have the opinion that it's dangerous to the child. Personally I wouldn't have a problem with taking my kids to a protest and I trust my judgement and instincts that I would get them out of there if I felt they were in danger. Oh, and sometimes I let my older son play hookey from school and we do horrible things like go to the zoo or Northwest trek. Sometimes we even just stay home and rest.
Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. ~Ludwig van Beethoven
Shame On You!
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:56am.;-)
XO!
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
Just saying...if people who
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:49am.It's the same old story - Everywhere I go, I get slandered, Libeled, I hear words I never heard in the bible
The more you see, the more you know.
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:51am.If everybody went to Iraq, we'd have a much different kind of debate about what's happening there.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
And You Know This For A Fact Because
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 10:53am.you've been there & witnessed the atrocities yourself right Rick? Or are you just taking the word of others to form your own opinion?
"Do not mistake for conspiracy and intrigue what can best be explained by stupidity and incompetence." - Unknown
I think you are missing his point..
Submitted by DC on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 11:45am.That experience firsthand is usually more reliable than assumptions.
I think Rick is saying he knows there's often more truth to a situation than what you are told or heard.
Before everyone gets their panties in a wad
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 6:43pm.There was a woman posting yesterday in the Olympian about bringing her child down to "welcome the troops".
I believe I coined the phrase "neither side owns the franchise on being stupid"