A lot of conditioning also has to do with self preservation, or what people percive as a threat.

Consider seeing a group of loud people, wearing baggy clothes, shuffling down a sidewalk, and acting outside of your social norm. I have seen white and black people acting this way, and I tend to avoid those groups. Why? Because some instinct tells me loud unruly groups outside of my social group could be trouble. Am I correct? Am I racist? Or am I avoiding something that does not fit my group?

Consider if you saw me walking down the street openly wearing my sidearm and drinking tea. What is your reaction? My experience is that people make several different choices, some ignore it, some assume I must be a cop or security (after all "normal people" don't wear guns right?) they may consider my actions and view me as not threat, they may react on their beliefs anything outside of their norm is a threat, they may assume that since I am acting in this manner I must have every right to do so, or they go screaming to the police to protect them from the horrible armed tea drinker.

I don't think a test will show you if you have a subtle distinction between how armed people may or may not be a threat, anymore than if you have a subtle bias towards on race or another. This is something that you must answer out of your heart and your past experiences, coupled with your own worldview. A person who was mugged by a gang of will view those people differently than those who have not. Those with higher education will interact with races differently. I react with people based on outward action, and how I feel they will interact with me.

For instance every Monday I see a number of people who have been released from a local correctional facility (Shelton I think) at the Olympia Transit Center waiting for a bus to Lakewood. Sometimes I take that bus. These people range from bleary eyed former drug addicts who can barely communicate, to people who seem "normal" I avoid them all, regardless of race. Why? Because as a group, I do not wish to interact with them. Experience has shown me they are a less desireable group to interact with than others.

Ultimately, like seeks like. This to me is not wrong, but natural. Race, sex, creed, sexual orientation, these are not things in and of themselves that justify discrimination. I have a bias against those I cannot effectively communicate with, against those who have chosen lifestyles that strongly clash with mine, or with those who I feel based on outward actions or recent past history may be undesriable to associate with.

Action is the deciding factor. Some may not choose to associate with me because I am wearing a gun. I may choose not to associate with a person of color because they just got out of jail. I may choose not to associate with a white male because he is a drug addict.

I feel it is okay to have preferences in dealing with people. If you are a car dealer and an unwashed person with dirty clothes walks in at the same time someone in a three piece suit does, who will you talk to? Guess what, you just practiced economic discrimination. Was it wrong? To me no, because the choice was the one most likely on past experience to make a sale.

All people are created equal. They may not remain equal as they make life choices. All have basic fundemental human rights though that MUST be respected at all times.

That is to me is the balance point. If you respect human and civil liberties regardless of race, creed, etc... or if you would deny any of those liberties.

So the question is not, if you have a preference for one group or another, but if you would deny anyone civil and human rights.

but I pasted from the website to save the keystrokes and that's what I got.

As to the racist question, I think that bias and prejudice, particularly bias and prejudice which we don't recognize in ourselves, is what makes a person a racist. 

Physical attraction is a whole different realm imho though bias and prejudice can probably influence attraction. I would point out that many slave owners engaged in intimate relations with their slaves, kind of suggests that physical attraction and racism are not necessarily incompatible.  

I wouldn't call it internalized oppression, because it isn't really a measure of attitudes or intentions (implicit or otherwise), but rather a striking bit of evidence about the continued presence of racism at a cultural level. Everyone has had that experience of having some inappropriate racist/sexist/aggressive thought pop into their head -- followed by the thought: "Where the hell did that come from? I don't really think that." Well, there's a lot of stuff going on under the hood that never reaches awareness (such as priming). These processes can absolutely influence behavior (as shown by the differences in reaction times in the study), but still not be a good indicator about the beliefs and values of a particular individual.

I think the message from this study is that the present state of cultural bias is still strong enough that it is evident in the way language is represented in the brain.