|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 11 users and 47 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by peteb on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 12:01am.
Reflections on May Day, 2008 in Olympia Sadly the message was lost to much of the Olympia community because of the actions of a few, none of whom as far as I know were involved in organizing the May Day event. The issue of graffiti on the Capitol walls or breaking bank windows is not primarily an abstract or moral issue of right or wrong, and some of the discussion has been focused on that. I do think that the rock throwing was morally objectionable because bank employees and customers were in the two banks and could have been injured when the rocks were thrown. My main criticism of the graffiti and window breaking is rather, that it is bad and wrong strategy and tactics within the context of 2008 Olympia. How do these acts by a few, a self-appointed vanguard, build the anti-war or immigrant rights movement? They don't!! If a response is that they build some other movement, e.g., Black Bloc, that is opportunist as one is using other movements to build one's own. No respect was shown to the organizers of the event, e.g., going into the Capitol and writing on its walls, when the announced plan was to have a rally on the steps. No respect was shown to the May Day marchers, which included both immigrants and children, to the trashing of the banks so close to the march. I understand the anger and rage against this oppressive economic system and share it. However, what does screaming at the police accomplish or breaking some windows at two banks? This anger is counterproductive and self-indulgent if it strengthens what we are trying to overcome. In the short-run, the anti-war movement here is weakened. These actions of property damage are not understood or supported by the overwhelming majority of Olympia residents and that is relevant in assessing it. Also relevant is the alienation of many of the marchers and organizers. Isn't one of our objectives to gain public support? Instead let us use this rage productively and in a cooperative way with others activists and progressive and radical groups--not to sabotage, even if unintentionally, what others are doing--instead to build social movements that can stop this war, gain amnesty for immigrants and eventually, revolutionize this country. We need to develop a plan, a system of accountability, so that our demonstrations or direct actions are not hijacked by a few who have different goals, tactics from what is agreed on by the organizers and participants in our actions. I urge that those few who broke windows at the two banks or writing on the walls of the Capitol to reflect on their actions and apologize to the organizers of the May Day event. At the same time, it is important to remember that the six people who were arrested on Thursday are innocent until proven guilty and may not have been involved in the breaking of the bank windows--so let us not take the police version as fact. My hope is that all of us learn from what happened on Thursday, May 1st, 2008 so that we can move forward together to "Tear it Down, and Build it Up". In solidarity, Peter Bohmer
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Olyblogger of the Month: Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are: Rob RichardsInterests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism. emmettoconnell Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum. enpen Interests: OlyBlog calendar, Oly street art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff. Robert Whitlock Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment Rick Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons. Docent email list Latest Classified Ads Books & Collections ›Blog Local Oly May Day |
Thank you, Peter
Submitted by Sandy M on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 9:00am.Thanks Pete
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 10:47am.Although I rarely agree with Mr. Bohmer,
Submitted by JT on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 11:20am.I appreciate him condeming the behavior of those that acted out criminally. This is what I would expect from those who want to change the world through a peaceful process.
Now if only the ISM would do the same.
"Forgiving or punishing the terrorists is left to God. But, fixing their appointment with God is our responsibility."
itchyhitch.blogspot.com
How about we all focus on soethng we can clearly
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 11:25am.Well Said
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 11:17am.Ugly personal attack
Submitted by Sandy M on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:04pm.And this isn't
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:17pm.an attack?
It is okay for folks to agree and pat Bohmer on the back, but if there is a problem with what he said???
The particular line I selected is one of the most outrageous and to me hypocritcal things I have heard a person on public payroll say outside of national campaigns in a long time.
I trust it is still okay to be angered by something here? Or only certain things. Bohmer is not doing much unification with that particular line, and in fact may serve only to drive a wedge between camps. I know he has done that for me. In fact I intened to write to appropriate persons and express my outrage and suggest that the man is more of a liabilty than an asset to a state funded institution.
Perhaps he can spread his hatred of the capitalist system and love for a failed socialist system without using a state college as his bully pulpit.
Or should I sit quiet because Bohmer is a darling of certain camps?
If I offended you, I'm sorry.
Perhaps you have a better way of expressing anger with a comment that flys in the face of everything you believe in?
Frodo has failed. Bush and Cheney have the ring.Our economic system represents everything you believe in?
Submitted by Sandy M on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:22pm.I believe in Capitalism
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:29pm.I am as fervant a capitalist as Bohmer is not. "everything" is a bit of a stretch, let me rephrase it. How do you express anger at something that flys in the face of one of your core beliefs?
I'm starting with Les Purce, and probably an angry letter to whomever sits on appropriations board within state government.
Somebody please tell me every dime TESC pays Bohmer comes from private contributions, and has no state funds mingled with it.
My biggest problem with him is that he uses a state college as his pulpit and to provide his legitimacy, and to spread a message that is often contrary to other fundamental systems in this country. Capitalism like any system has it's flaws, but opposed to Marxism??? Marxism is not exactly flawless, nor have the followers of Marx conducted themselves in fine fashion either.
Frodo has failed. Bush and Cheney have the ring.uh 6...
Submitted by a.future.with.n... on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:34pm.your comments reveal your near total ignorance of what you are talking about. It is clear you have no knowledge at all of who Pete Bohmer is, what he stands for and what he teaches.
I recommend educating yourself before you start writing letters that will make you look like a fool. If that is too hard for you, you might want to consider dropping the subject as you add nothing to this discourse.
I'll shut up
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 8:39pm.I thought I had read somewhere he was a marxism professor, I may be wrong on that, and I apologize for the error.
Reading his webpage, I realize I've met the man before in passing.
I don't like him or his agenda any more though after reading the page.
However I wanted to express my total disgust at his statement which I highlighted.
Frodo has failed. Bush and Cheney have the ring.Higher educations approprations don't work that way.
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 9:03pm.The Capitalist System
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 05/04/2008 - 10:05pm.Systems have flaws. These flaws need to be addressed and fixed in order for the system to be more effective and efficient. Capitalism is not working out so well for a huge percentage of the world's population, therefore it needs reform. I say reform because it's not likely that we'll see capitalism replaced with another system any time soon, and if we wanted to, I haven't read about a system yet that could fully take it's place. ParEcon is close, but it too has some flaws that need reconciliation.