|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 8 users and 38 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:13pm.
This is the opposite map of Where Meta's voters where. If that old maps illustrated where the three most progressive precincts where in Olympia for the last election, these are certainly not those. Depending on how you see it, you could say these are the center of Olympia or the far right. View Larger Map These aren't all of the precincts won by both Rhenda and Craig, but the ones that they both won by a lot. I pulled a number out of the air, but you can see the data I worked from here. Generally speaking, these precincts ring Olympia on the south east side and the north west, geographically at least, not the center of Olympia. The inclusion of the three north west precincts, though, seems to disprove Dylan's point that more progressive voters come from out towards Evergreen. Then again, those precincts might be kind of pricey for Evergreen associated folks. The most interesting thing for me is the two precincts that border two of Meta's on the Eastside, Olympia 52 and Olympia 49. Any thoughts?
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
They're both
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:20pm.well, actually no
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:25pm.ah
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:28pm.I would say it is more
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:30pm.I would say it is more conservative relative to a degree, but not itself conservative. Sen. Joe Biden is more conservative than Ralph Nader, but not himself conservative.
SE Olympia, the Joe Biden of Thurston County. You heard it here first, folks.
exactly
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 4:33pm.Isn't that what a centurist would be?
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 7:03pm.somewhere between moderate and moderate?
You could say that
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 7:05pm.These are the conservative precincts
Submitted by Matthew Green on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 7:07pm.It's that simple. These are the most conservative precincts in Olympia, however you measure it -- Democrat vs Republican, school levy votes, Eyman initiatives, etc. Olympia is more liberal than average, true, but these are the most conservative parts of Olympia.
The many southeast precincts are the newest parts of town, built mostly since the the 1970s, mostly larger and more expensive homes, with a very suburban feel. No, Doug Mah doesn't live in one of these precincts, but he lives in a similar one right next door to these. Rhenda does live here. (I also live here, but I'm a political oddity in my neighborhood.)
The two northwest precincts are close to Evergreen geographically, but very far away politically. One is all the big homes with a view off of Crestline Boulevard, just up the hill from West Bay Marina, and the other is the Goldcrest neighborhood. Few Greeners in either.
In the northeast, precinct Oly 52 is mostly the East Bay condominiums -- wealthy and older. The other precinct, Oly 49, is the hardest to explain, but it does include some of the very large homes along East Bay Drive plus some nicer homes up the hill, though it also includes a chunk of the generally more liberal neighborhood around Bigelow Park.
This pattern also showed up in the campaigns of TJ Johnson, Laura Ware, and any other progressive you can name.
There is a very strong correlation between more wealthy precincts and more conservative precincts, but I don't think that's the whole story. The key factor, I believe, is that people who choose to live in the older neighborhoods, with generally smaller homes, closer to downtown, are more progressive. These neighborhoods also have more apartments and more renters, more diversity of residents (in age and economic status), more active neighborhood associations, and more little local businesses (Oly Food Co-op, San Francisco St Bakery). In short, more community life.
It seems that people who want to be part of a more active and vibrant community tend to vote more liberally. Perhaps that's not a surprise.
Matthew Green
Thank you, Matthew
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 7:29pm.And welcome to OlyBlog.
Good points, and SE Olympia commercial zoning
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 8:40pm.Especially about the east bay condos, I totally spaced on those. Might also explain why the downtown precincts didn't swing towards Meta, too many old folks on Capitol Way now-a-days.
I do have to take issue with this:
In southeast Olympia, at least, there is a lack of diversity of zoning that would allow little local businesses. I understand that some of the new developments out here (the Briggs Village and the one south of LBA park) will include some commercial zoning, but aside from the Boulevard Nursery and the Pit Stop, we're stuck.
In this map, the light pink is standard residential, dark pink is "neighborhood village," which allows commercial, but isn't built yet. The blue is two family residential and the purple is multi-family residential.
Its one thing to say that there are no businesses in SE Olympia, its another thing to say that the city never planned for businesses to be in SE Olympia.
more details and more maps
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 9:32pm.I did up a more detailed response here.
The gist:
Matt
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 7:54pm."Happy"?
Submitted by jlw on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 8:45pm.Most non-Republicans are reasonably concerned about the way the country is going to hell in a handbasket. Many Republicans apparently think that the rapture will intervene before the glaciers melt or the debts come due. Maybe they're "happier," but I'd consider a morose Democrat much saner any day.
Peace became pizza. -- Guglielmo
So
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 2:43pm.If a person has achieved a level of personal peace that enables them to be "happy" they are not concerned with how things are going to hell around them?
I am very concerned about the way things are going in this country. But I am also happy. Try living in the moment sometime. I can sit here right now, with an unscheduled day off, I feel crappy and tired, (the reason I took today off) but am still happy. Why? I have a job I love, I have a lifestyle I enjoy, and I am secure within myself that I can overcome and cope with any problems that may come my way.
I do my part to lesson my impact on the enviroment. If the sea levels rise, I'm not going to be flooded out. Economies will change, governments rise and fall, but all is just a fleeting moment. Perhaps we in this nation will have to endure a harsh dictatorship for a period. Perhaps this nation will come to it's senses soon. I don't know, but I can still be happy.
Maybe you can't be happy for whatever reason, but those of us who have achieved a level of happiness, even in unusual times should not be derided for it.
May you live in interesting times
May you come to the attention of those in authority
May you find what you are looking for
Ok...
Submitted by Matthew Green on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 10:36pm.I'll back off on the word "community". That word is too loaded.
But I believe that voting patterns do indeed have a strong correlation with how people conduct themselves, including where they choose to live. (If there were no correlation, then every vote count in every precinct would hover around a statistical mean.)
Here are some patterns I have seen that relate to voting results by precinct in Olympia. This is based on ringing literally thousands of doorbells across the city. (Note that these are tendencies; there are exceptions to every rule.):
- The more liberal precincts are closer to downtown, and the people there are more likely to say they go there a lot. People in the more conservative precincts are more likely to say they don't like downtown.
- The more liberal precincts are more likely to be older grid-pattern neighborhoods. The more conservative precincts are more likely to be suburban-style cul-de-sacs.
- The liberal precincts have greater diversity of age and wealth. - The liberal precincts are poorer on average.
- The liberal precincts have more neighborhood associations, and have more active participants in those associations. The more conservative precincts are more likely to have homeowners associations, which have a different purpose and culture.
- The liberal precincts have more local small businesses in or near them. Yes, this is partly a function of the zoning, which did not allow for small commercial spaces in subdivisions until recently. Also, the liberal precincts are closer to the 4th/State and Harrison corridors.
- The liberal precincts tend to participate more in city programs for neighborhoods such as tree plantings, putting up entrance signs or kiosks, or block watches/night out.
- When some weird/cool artistic event comes along (painting a mandala in the street, neighborhood arts walk), it is almost always in the liberal precincts.
If you still don't believe there's a fundamental cultural difference in different neighborhoods, just do a survey of the bumper stickers by precinct.
I like Wilson's description that, broadly speaking, there is a progressive Olympia sense of community (I'm back to that word) and a more conservative sense of community, which is probably closer to that found in Lacey and Tumwater. As Wilson notes, there also may be differences between them relating to church going or public service groups or whatever; I don't have information on that.
The difference lead people to, among other things, live in certain parts of town based on what better satisfies their own sense of community. So, there is a stratification in our community that follows geographic, political, and cultural lines.
My biggest fear, politically speaking, is that if the more pro-downtown, pro-diversity, pro-neighborhood association, pro-weird/cool elements of the community are outnumbered within the Olympia electorate, then the Olympia city council starts looking a lot more like the Lacey city council and stops promoting the things that make Olympia different and (to my mind) special.
Matthew Green
It was..
Submitted by wilson on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 8:52pm.well,
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 12/01/2007 - 9:50pm.This I think is one example of exclusiveness you may get from progressives, but you have to know that progressives feel it's reciprocated.
Generalizations
Submitted by grandma on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 8:52am.Seems like a lot of generalizations about "progresssive" and "conservative" (which is an interesting choice of editorial words given the discussions taking place in another string about social contract) from a small voter sample in Olympia.
The facts: There are 60 precincts in Olympia. Hogan won 4 (05, 18, 20, 44). Mah won all the rest. In the four precincts Hogan won, she received 389 votes (54%); Mah received 336 votes (46%). [In precint 20, Hogan had one more vote than Mah, 67-66].
There are a variety of reasons people vote for one candidate over the other. In my travels around the community during the weeks before the election, a repeated theme I heard about the Mayoral race was: experience in local governance (or perceived lack of). Experience has nothing to do with "left" vs "right".
I live in Goldcrest
Submitted by JulieM on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 9:16am.and can attest to what has been said here about the differing ideas of community. We moved in last year and were given a gift basket by the homeowner's (yes-not neighborhood) association and had a visit by two local churches, but didn't get much of a welcome from our neighbors. I know that the Goldcrest president applied for a city sponsored neighborhood matching grant to fix the Goldcrest sign on Cooper point. It's my understanding that the grant is intended to foster neighborhood cohesiveness and community building, and it seems like asking for money for a couple of park benches would do more to foster community than fixing a sign, that seems fine in my opinion.
While I was disappointed to see how conservative Goldcrest is, I'm not surprised. At the last association meeting our president managed to get jabs in at Evergreen students and liberals, all while talking about speed bumps and tree trimming.
I think that the points Matt made about downtown and liberal precincts tend to be true for most cities I've lived in (apart from San Francisco where people closer to downtown tend to be wealthier), but it does seem that there is more judgement, if that's the right word, from people in Olympia about where you live...but maybe that's because this is the first time I've lived in a conservative area.
For What It's Worth
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 4:40pm.Julie, you live on what is a very odd street in Goldcrest. I have no idea why. At Halloween only 1 or 2 houses seem to participate. The rest are dark. I live on the adjacent cul-de-sac and every house participates. When Christmas lights go up every house on our street will have lights. 1 or 2 on your street. I agree that Goldcrest is a very conservative neighborhood.
But, before we are labels we are people and if you can't find neighbors on your street you can find them on ours. It's a short walk.
I support those speed reduction devices, by the way. Too many close calls by the crosswalk intersection. Cars have no business doing 40mph on Goldcrest Drive. I also support any tree trimming that reveals street signs covered up by branches or the trimming of branches falling into the roadway. Try to read the Sunnyvale CT sign the next time you're approaching your house from the front entrance (off Cooper Point).
I noticed other streets seem more festive
Submitted by JulieM on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 6:27pm.both on Halloween and now, so that makes sense. Of course, we don't have lights up, but that has more to do with lack of a convenient outdoor outlet and laziness.
I'm also for the speed bumps and tree trimming, I just thought it was funny (or annoying) that Charles worked criticism of Evergreen students and democrats into his talk.
I have an impression that some of the neighborhood associations, as opposed to our homeowner's association, are more about fostering 'community', but I'm not sure that is true. We DO have that yearly picnic with the fire truck and bounce house. I shouldn't complain.
Charlie has good intentions
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 6:38pm.Charlie has good intentions for Goldcrest, I think. He's stuck in the past on a few things for sure.
The picnic attendance is sad. I wish more people would attend. I can only guess it has to do with the people who run it.
Man, do I feel lucky...
Submitted by Phil Owen on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 2:15pm.I get to be a progressive AND I get to have both the town square and the church.
I really like the neighborhoods closer to downtown. I like the grid system, the easy walk downtown, the neighborhood convenience stores, the parks & sidewalks, the active residents, and the neighborhood churches. I really like the older houses.
I also really appreciate the difference between a neighborhood association and a homeowner's association. I've lived in a homeowner's association once (I was actually a homeowner too!), and noticed the strong trend towards domineering in the association's leadership. It's almost like people run for association board because they want to change the color of their neighbor's house! Neighborhood associations seem to be more about bringing people together.
The Canaanite's Call
That's where the voters are.
Submitted by Dylan Carlson on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 7:20pm.I think it's interesting to note how voter turnout enters into this discussion.
If you make a map of the "most liberal" precincts in Oly and overlap it with the "highest voter turnout" precincts, you get a map that looks a lot like one above.
The only noteworthy exception would be the South Capital neighborhood (which traditionally wins in both categories.) Not surprisingly, this 'hood was taken by Mrs. Thomas (a South Cap resident.)
For the most part, these NW and SE neighborhoods are NOT the most "conservative" ones in town, they are actually the most reliably Democratic (big D). These are the types of neighborhoods that pushed Chris Gregoire over Dino Rossi in 2004. These are the neighborhoods that pushed Simple Majority over the top in 2007. And it's all because they actually turned in a ballot.
If the community builder types want downtown values to dominate in local elections, you should start by registering voters and turning them out on election day.
What are you doing Dylan? You're going to ruin everything!
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 7:42pm.I'm hearing you say that these precincts are not conservative because they are full of Democrats. I pointed out earlier and Matt Green seconded that these precincts ARE indeed conservative in comparison to most other precincts. There are a lot of Greens and people with other political ideals in this town that are much more liberal than conservative Democrats are, and there are a lot of conservative Dems (centrists) in this town.
They're not Republicans
Submitted by Dylan Carlson on Mon, 12/03/2007 - 10:05am.Rob and Matthew are correct to an extent. These suburban 'hoods are less liberal than the downtown neighborhoods.
BUT, my point is that these are still the types of 'hoods that we progressives must THANK for pushing our state's government to the left in the past few years. It may not be as progressive as you would like it (everything takes time.) But we've made some great gains recently.
Look at recent statewide strides that progressives have made. All these gains were VERY close and they only happened because moderate Democrats in suburban Puget Sound actually voted.
You have a point.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 12/03/2007 - 10:36am.