|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 9 users and 47 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 8:21pm.
You get what you give. What goes around comes around. As the call, so is the echo. All these sayings come from traditional wisdom. That wisdom guides us in how we treat the people in our community. If we look at our own lives history often we can see this is true. Unfortunately the police are determined to seek retribution beyond what is fair. Unless we stop them, rationality and wisdom will be defeated by vengeance and abuse of power. The Olympian states, “Physically damaging or disabling an emergency vehicle constitutes first-degree malicious mischief, a Class B felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $20,000 fine.” Historically, challenges to power have been met with fury and retribution in orders of magnitude larger than what could be considered fair and just. One destroyed cop car is not equal to ten years in jail served by people used as scapegoats. The police officers will receive no punishment for beating and dousing the public, yet again, with pepper spray, sending one student to the hospital with bruised ribs. Instead they will receive over time pay, which will continue to increase the costs of the incident. The police have detectives issuing subpoenas for photos and videos taken of the riot. "We will get it," said Sheriff Dan Kimball. Finding someone to blame is a priority for the police force. Anyone who was there knows that it is impossible to fairly blame one person or even a small group of people. How many people were shouting ‘fuck the cops’? A hundred. I stood in front of the cop car, I shouted to ‘let him go’. I stood unable to stop the increasing mayhem, provoked by the police. I watched people getting angry as their friends and community members were crying from pain. Sheriff Dan Kimball shows himself again to be a divider in our community, promoting repression. He has proven his inability or unwillingness to bridge divides, repeatedly using excessive force on the public. This has left Olympia grumbling and cost the taxpayers in unnecessary police overtime pay. I demand his removal from office by the Olympia City Council. Evergreen has procedures for disciplinary action, counseling services, and a community who can better creatively determine a course of justice. We are willing and capable of handling this ourselves fairly without outside interference. We even have our own competent and intelligent police force. The city cops and courts must be stonewalled. The riot was provoked by the cops and encouraged by the majority watching. Sentencing friends to ten years in prison for something we all have accountability for is intolerable. Do not help the police in their retaliation on our community. We can stop them and we must.
| |
Ummm....
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 8:54pm.Well said for the most part although I cannot agree with your sentiment.
I do have to wonder why you think the OLYMPIA CITY COUNCIL can remove the THURSTON COUNTY SHERIFF?
The story so far: In the beginning, the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people mad and been widely regarded as a bad idea. -The Restaurant at the end of the Universe
Whoops!
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 9:16pm.I honestly believe
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 9:18pm.You won't get very far with them, at least if you continue in your anti cop/government rhetoric. You are very articulate about it, which is more than most in that vein :-)
Of course I'm the guy walking around openly wearing a gun, so who am I to criticize the viewpoints of others? :-)
Do you think if you went to a metting of the commissioners and presented a solid case with facts and ideals to back up your opinion you would get heard out? Or do you think you will get dismissed as a kook?
The story so far: In the beginning, the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people mad and been widely regarded as a bad idea. -The Restaurant at the end of the Universe
I'd like to pic this statement apart...
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 9:27pm.I'll italicize my responses...
"Historically, challenges to power have been met with fury and retribution in orders of magnitude larger than what could be considered fair and just.
Yes and no. Government like any other entity will respond with enough force to protect it's existence. In an ideal society that existence comes from the people, who will dictate the level of acceptable force.
One destroyed cop car is not equal to ten years in jail served by people used as scapegoats.
It goes beyond a single vehicle. That is an emergency vehicle, which they are now one less short. I am sure they have spares, but concievably this could limit a response before it is replaced when it may be needed. That is why the punishment is so strong for this sort of action.
The police officers will receive no punishment for beating and dousing the public, yet again, with pepper spray, sending one student to the hospital with bruised ribs. Instead they will receive over time pay, which will continue to increase the costs of the incident."
You see it as beating and dousing the public, but many people will see it as standard crowd control techniques. Believe me I am no great fan of law enforcement run amok and have been on the end of a "My partner has his gun out in case you try something" conversation and did not like it. However pepper spray is fairly harmless in nearly all cases, and using batons to push and break up an unruly mob is not a great offence. You may find it informative to study crowd control techniques. Mobs are a great force to order, and remember there are reports of rioters trying to grap deputy's weapons. Do you want those people to get the cop's guns? What would have happened had they seized a weapon? And for those who are about to say "Ahaha! We shouldn't have guns on campus, it is illegal to carry a gun to an "outdoor music festival" already.
Just ask yourself, not in the context of "I don't like the man" but as a citizen, what do you do when a mob gets out of control? What would have most likely turned into a brief detainment and release turned into something else entirely.
The story so far: In the beginning, the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people mad and been widely regarded as a bad idea. -The Restaurant at the end of the Universe
The police
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 9:49pm.Correct me if I am wrong
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 9:52pm.But didn't the cops start trying to disperse the crowd only after they got nasty over a simple misdemeanor arrest?
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
I was there but...
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:08pm.Crowd control is tough
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:11pm.Especially when the cops are understaffed. These are pretty standard responses to unrest in crowds. Do you think a pumped up crowd listening a group that has some pretty anti government songs had anything to do with it? The fact that at least one person had spraypaint to tag things with makes me wonder... Kinda funny isn't it? Who goes to a concert with spray paint?
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
Hey Tipper, let's not blame the music.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:16pm.I'm not blaming the music per se
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:18pm.But the attitude and following that may come from it. There are a lot more shootings at hip hop clubs than concert halls....
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
A lot more poverty too.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:22pm.So it's ok
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:31pm.For poor people to kill each other over west coast vs east coast rappers or whatever insane uneducated moronic excuses they use to kill each other?
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
This was real positive hiphop
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:26pm.Poor people are
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:33pm."kept out of concert halls" You make it sound deliberate. Poor people are "kept out" of a lot concerts...
I don't like the socialist notion of redistribution of wealth. I work hard for what I have, and if I invest it and make more of it, I don't need some wild eyed bomb throwing anarchist demanding I hand it over.
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
Capitalism is just as much a redistribution of wealth...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:57pm....but in the other direction.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
What do you propose then?
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:03pm.I read a book called "The Good Earth" one time by Pearl Buck. Kinda interesting what can happen when the wealth gets redistributed....
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
Look...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:24pm....even Adam Smith, the grandfather of the free market, thought that it was in everyone's interest to have a safety net. What we see happening right now is so far beyond acceptable with respect to human dignity and suffering, what Robert Reich calls "Super Capitalism." You think you benefit from this system? Not hardly. Ask yourself this: how bad does it have to get before people without huge amounts of capital stop acting and voting against their interests?
And we're not talking about blood running in the streets, so please don't go there. Just look at other countries with rational policies about education, health care, retirement, etc. Why can't we have that?
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Because
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:27pm.We don't have a stable population. Our society is still in flux. Close the borders for about 50 years and start teaching social responsibility and issues to the people inside, unify them in a single NATIONAL IDENTIY and then see what happens. We can't have that level of "stability" yet. To many hypenated americans and not enough Americans.
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
By every econonic measure available...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:30pm.emigrants to this country have enriched it. They also commit less crime, and they learn English within one generation, just like they always have. Those are not reasons why we can't have more rational policies.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Yeah
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 10:19pm.I saw a lot of that learning english within one generation in California... but I digress. I am not anti immigrant, I am anti non homogenization, and I do not believe there is a homogenized enough culture in the US to ensure a functioning socialist society.
Nor am I sure I like a socialist society. Too many individual liberties may have to get sacrificed in order to create the sort of nanny state that socialism demands.
God God God/Won't you lead us through this mess/God God God/From the places of concrete
God God God/Nothing's worse than ignorance/God God God/I just won't accept defeat
France is a country...
Submitted by Rick on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 11:45pm....with huge issues about emigration and identity. There are large portions of the country that are disaffected and angry. Still, they manage to have the best health care in the world, and all the benefits of a social safety net.
And, just to echo Michael Moore, one could just as easily call it "christianized medicine," e.g., one where we take care of the poor and vulnerable (as well as everyone else).
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Yup
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 11:56pm.France is a great place unless you are a islamic woman. " "They used to burn dustbins and cars – now they burn girls." These were the words of Kahina Benziane after her sister Sohane was raped, tortured and burned alive by schoolmates on October 4, 2002 in the Parisian suburb of Vitry."
Start here.
Nope, France's nice stable population makes for a socialist paradise. I'll take crazed greeners and imported anarchists any day over they way the French do business.
Where is the social safety net for the islamic women who have the unmitigated gall to live outside of an opressive religious lifestyle?
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. -- Douglas Adams
Not sure what you're saying here.
Submitted by Rick on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 1:07am.Are we talking about health care or social unrest? My point was just that social unrest doesn't seem to stop the French from making good decisions about how to allocate social resources.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Wild eyed rejectors of an obviously busted system
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 10:58pm.Most socialists don't even pray for redistribution of wealth. That is too much to ask that billionaires give up their family inheritances. The top tier of the wealthiest in this country, those that have over around $3 million in wealth, usually stay wealthy for generations no matter how hard they work. Some work hard but they still started so far ahead that it is impossible to compete and near impossible for them to not make money with their money.
I'm sure you do work hard. I think by definition socialists aren't "wild eyed bomb throwing anarchists," instead most are poor people who want to work hard and do but get nothing in return. Very few are the extraordinary who start with nothing and shoot to the top. It is very nearly a myth. I think socialism is about making sure everyone has access to education for as long as they wish to learn and get good enough grades. That everyone has healthcare so that sickness won't leave your family without a provider. That people can rely that their jobs won't get shipped to Mexico. That maybe the richest among us and the poorest among us will still ride the bus together and when they do they might find some interesting things to talk about.
It would take an entire
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:12pm.Change of human nature to achieve what you want to. Good luck. I have been a very poor person working hard. I've gone from sleeping in the woods to owning a small yacht (remember I can get a bigger one if I really wanted to). How? I didn't let myself get ground down. I have despaired at times, and demanded a redistribution of wealth. Then I finally figured out it's easier to make my own than wait for a pie in the sky redistribution of wealth. I think they tried it in Russia, oh circa 1917... didn't work. In fact I don't know of any "redistribution" scheme that has worked.
I distrust socialized medicine as well. It's a wonderful idea if it could be made to work in a fair and equitable manner. But those who earn more often footing an unequal share of the bill. Just because I am capable of earning or creating more wealth does not mean I should pay out a higher percentage of that wealth than someone making less, yet it usually happens that the rich pay out a disproportionate amount. That does not encourage upward mobility, it reinforces the notion that you can do as little as possible but someone else will still take care of you.
Give me capitalism and a society that truly believes in it any day.
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
There is nothing but capitalism. There is nothing but capitalism
Submitted by wildleaf on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:25pm.Now I never said
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 11:32pm.I don't give anything back. I don't feel the urge to brag about it or discuss what I do. Believe me, I remember where I have been, and do what I can. Some will say I don't do enough, others will demand an accounting. I simply say I am satisfied in my own heart with what I have done and continue to do.
Also, I used the term "yacht" somewhat tongue in cheek. An Aquarius 23 is a bit smallish, but comfortable. Also it is my home. It is not a luxury item. My idea of a luxury item are fancy hardwood pistol grips.
Some would say my laptop is pretty fancy. I say I bought a used machine that had some minor damage that I fixed. It all depends on your worldview.
.45/70 Government (The only Government I trust!)
"I don't know of any "redistribution" scheme that has worked"
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 1:08pm.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
Usually when I hear the term
Submitted by security_six on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 10:23pm."Redistribution of Wealth" I envision revolutionaries in Russia running around shooting people who they think represent the "ruling, priveleged class."
What you describe is not so much a "redistribution of wealth" as some would want, but tax funded social services. We still have a wealthy class in this country.
God God God/Won't you lead us through this mess/God God God/From the places of concrete
God God God/Nothing's worse than ignorance/God God God/I just won't accept defeat
I am describing income redistribution
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 10:44pm.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
Rebuttal From The "Other Side"
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 3:57pm.Unfortunately? I say fortunately. An unruly mob of kids who think they are above the law destroyed government property while threatening officers of the law. The police should be determined to seek retribution on behalf of the police department and the law abiding citizens of this great city who helped pay for the destroyed property.
A group of individuals who believe they are above the law have no right to even try to stop them. Do you seriously believe the police are solely seeking revenge and abusing power? What if it was your car that was totaled while you were in class one day. Wouldn't you want them to pursue the offenders? Wouldn't you expect to be reimbursed?
While I agree 10 years is harsh, I'm sure that's just a maximum and none of those who flagrantly broke the law will ever serve 10 years. As for scapegoats, let's call them what they really are: criminals, felons, and law-breakers. They are far from "scapegoats".
The police officers shouldn't receive any punishment for doing their jobs. They have as much right to protect themselves as you do. They also have as much right to use whatever force necessary to protect property and lives. The criminals who were threatening them were lucky they only got pepper sprayed and a few bruised ribs. I don't know why you think they'll get overtime pay but again, half of your post is baseless theories, speculation and statements without facts.
Because it's their JOB. When criminals create havoc and threaten the lives of officers of the law and destroy property, it's the policemen's job to investigate, charge (blame) & arrest the offenders.
Shouting profanity isn't a crime. So what? Where your buddies went wrong was threatening the officers and damaging their property and stealing belongings from the car.
What were you doing to stop the increasing mayhem that certainly was not provoked by the police. Again, they were doing their job. Your friends and community members wouldn't have been crying from pain had they not rioted in the first place, damaged and stole government property and threatened lives.
I completely disagree. Dan Kimball and his officers acted within the laws and did their jobs. He neither divides our community or promotes repression. If anybody has proven their inability or unwillingness to bridge divides, it's TESC. If you read the comments from others at The O and listen to talk radio, people have had it with TESC, it's policies, it's teachings and the shenanigans of the student body. Most are calling for the removal of TESC completely. Close it down, stop funding it, etc. If you truly want to bridge divides between TESC and the community, encourage those who were responsible to come forward. Don't post propoganda like above encouraging others to hate police and paint your college and student body as little angels who did nothing wrong. Don't destroy our city, it's name & reputation.
Obviously TESC's can't provide adequate policing services and neither are they a court of law or seperate entity entitled to a private justice system. TESC is a member of the community of Olympia which requires it and it's student body to abide by the laws of the state and community, not their own made up rules and justice.
Only TESC believes this statement. The police did not provoke or encourage the majority. They were doing what they could to difuse the volitale situation and protect themselves. I haven't seen or read anywhere where they jumped on bullhorns and encouraged rioting by others either. This is seriously a delusional statement, one without fact or basis to back it up.
Sentencing felony criminals to ten years in prison for something they have accountability for is not only tolerable, it's required. As a law abiding citizen of Olympia, I encourage others to help the police department seek the arrest and prosecution of these criminals who destroyed property I helped pay for on a college campus I am forced to fund. We will not allow you to stop the police and you won't. Justice for all and all for justice. If you don't like the laws and don't want to live in society by them, move.
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
"Only TESC believes this statement. "
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 4:33pm.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
Law justice is not fairly possible and will cost the tax payers.
Submitted by wildleaf on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 4:42pm.It is not just 'the
Submitted by Just another voice on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 7:40pm.It is not just 'the police'.
The majority of our campus wants those responsible to be held accountable.
It was not OK for this group of people to intimidate an officer that is PART OF OUR COMMUNITY, and violate the campus social contract.
But I am Just Another Voice
This would be a good time for the PDs
Submitted by Mike on Sun, 02/17/2008 - 7:48pm.to step back and convene a meeting with the activist community to reduce tensions and to give this particular instance of mob violence a pass.
I am not keen about this kind of activity, but I was not there, I do not know what went on. I do believe that the activist community has significant resentment simmering against the City and various pds at this time.
Sometimes, the smart move is to step back instead of squaring off.
A few clarifications...1. A
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 1:16am.A few clarifications...
1. A sheriff is an elected position. This is why the sheriff doesn't care what people think about him. If you don't like the way his department does business, you can vote him out in the next election.
It will still be funny when a bunch of people show up to an Olympia City Council meeting asking them to do something. It'll be even more funny if members of the council think they can.
This is also why the sheriff's department is far more likely to go out and enforce the law. With a police department, the chief has to answer to the city council and/or city manager.
2. Sheriff's Department: Deputies
Police Department: Officers
I was also present at the
Submitted by hollyg on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 2:33am.I really can't overstate
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 12:59pm.I really can't overstate this: when there's an increasingly agitated crowd gathering around you and you're significantly outnumbered, pepper spray is pretty low on the proverbial totem pole of defense measures.
You can't read people's minds and must assume the worst. It's saying that goes around in the military and I'm sure law enforcement: It's better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.
I realize it's your account, but I've noticed this trend of "the crowd wasn't doing anything until after the police used pepper spray." Uh - hello? What are they supposed to do with an amped up crowd surrounding them? As an officer you're not out there to hold a lecture. This isn't the classroom; it's the real world. If you think an arrest or detention is unlawful, you may want to use the proper channels.
It's not even just Evergreen students who do this. Virtually every college student thinks that because they took a class that may have mentioned the legality of something, they qualify as legal representation.
In the Army they're called "Barracks Lawyers."
musing
Submitted by wildleaf on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 1:18pm.I have to disagree
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 1:54pm.Using proper channels and procedures, coupled with a firm knowledge of the law (and of course in my case it really helps that I have broken no laws) have begun change within both the OPD and Intercity Transit. I believe there are a couple of bloggers here who have participated in meetings with both agencies who can attest to that fact.
Briefly, with IT, they have gone from saying "no guns on the bus" to no "unlawfully carried guns" and are working on implementing a policy in line with state law. Channels and procedures.
OPD, well many here know of my little adventures with them. I can assure you, by proper channels and procedures, backed up with a bit of lawyer, and the understanding of at least one Lieutenant changes are being made with their policy as well.
How can I walk down the street in Olympia visibly wearing a loaded handgun and not have the same problems others have with the system, when the system shows a flaw? How can I work within the system and effect change?
It's all in how you do it. And being correct in the eyes of the law, courts, and constitution helps A LOT. Systems work if you work the systems. Every time I have had conflict with government I have used their own systems to work in my favor. In San Diego I did little but put up a delaying action against a forgone and incorrect conclusion. Two years later I learned some of the groundwork I helped lay resulted in justice for the displaced live aboard boaters I worked with.
It's all in how you do things my friend, all in how you do things.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Exceptions aside
Submitted by wildleaf on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 2:29pm.$0
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 2:39pm.One, I didn't walk into a police station wearing a gun. I was walking down the street wearing a gun, although either action is perfectly legal and protected.
I have spent no money on lawyers, the attorney I have right now is betting on the OPD screwing up (again) and a nice juicy lawsuit. Everything else I have done I have argued myself.
I don't know what the reaction would be to a lawfully armed person of color peaceable open carrying. I do know that in Virginia where this is a more common practice there have been no racist reactions to it, and that an asian gentleman I know of in this state who OCs has had no problems.
But if you want to reinforce negative stereotypes against people of color go for it.
I hate to break it to you, but IT had no idea my race when I instituted an entirely email exchange regarding their unlawful practices. I simply quoted state law and stuck to my guns so to speak. Didn't take too long.
Of course if you want to disempower yourself and refuse to believe you can work change, go for it. Don't ruin it for everyone else though.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
I really dislike this
Submitted by wildleaf on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 3:05pm.I really dislike this conversation. The first reason is I am totally for people going through proper channels to changing the law or defending their rights. If they have the tenacity, knowledge and resources they should go for it. I work through the system all the time, and have no problem with navigating through never ending bureaucracy and overcoming endless forms, meetings, procedures and blocks from people. I enjoy it.
However, I reserve the right to work for change in a more direct way, knowing that the consequences might be overwhelmingly bad. The reason is I want people who are in power who choose to not represent the interests of the public to be worried. If people in power think they can get away with murder, they will murder.
If a riot every now and then succeeds in making our public officials and our ruthless CEOs worried then I'm ok with that. If it shakes out a few concessions for a better life or makes people come together and confront the stark reality of poverty, social injustice, institutional racism, and thousands of people getting evicted from their homes by banks, then terrific.
So
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 3:12pm.If a person can't or won't work the system burn down a car? Or whatnot?
BTW, I cannot agree with you the the evictions. Regardless of how upfront or shady the loans were, everything was still in the contract people signed. If you can't or won't take the time to understand the document, don't sign it. Too many people did, and too many people failed to educate themselves before making their decisions.
EDIT: Ya know I don't think we are really too far apart on a lot of things. Methodolgy seems to be the biggest issue, well that and I still believe in this country... I'm for ending this conversation after you rebut my statement if you are.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
cool then
Submitted by wildleaf on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 3:16pm.And the beer
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 3:17pm.Don't forget the beer! :-p
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
yes/no
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 4:37pm.The first response to this will most assuredly be "how dare you compare The Boston Tea Party with a "riot" at TESC!!". They were both acts of rebellion, acts of revolt. The police have, maybe since the beginning of police, come down hard on youth, poor people, non-whites, queer people, etc. What happened at TESC was an example of a group of people realizing they had the upper hand against the police and saying, "We aren't going to let you win this time. You will not take one of us today."
Yes, there were people who had been drinking, and people who had been smoking weed, and maybe a couple of people looking for trouble. It was also a group of people that have studied or seen first hand the way police control The People with violence in order to protect capital.
Events like this are not to be taken lightly, it would be incredibly unwise to just right this off as if they were soccer hooligans, or drunks blowing off steam. Events like this provide a spark that can ignite a movement. As a community, I believe it is in our best interests to start a conversation about the police and how they do their jobs. Now that this has happened, the police will undoubtedly ramp up their reactions to college students, especially at protests. If we want to live in the kind of society we dream of, with real freedom, and real access to community, we have to come together and support one another. We can't criticize each other and bicker because that only does our "enemy's" job for them. Everybody is needed, every idea is valuable, every tactic is a step closer to accomplishing our goals.
Yep. A wise friend convinced me of radical necessity
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 4:46pm.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
Here is the problem I see....
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 5:04pm.People got uppity over an arrest. Without having facts in hand and jumping to wild conclusions they got upset. That rolled downhill. Police responded with accepted crowd contol techniques, pepper spray, etc...
I really fail to see what the problem is. They acted to restore public order as they have been charged to do by the community.
Of course those who would like to see no law enforcement, or simply neutered bobbies running around with no real power complain bitterly every time any basic act of crowd control is performed.
The only thing I can see wrong here was that there was not an adequate security force in the first place.
And please cite some documented examples of OPD coming down on minorities or queers simply because of skin color, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Proven, documented examples that show a regular sustained pattern of behavior.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Documented examples?
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:03pm.It would surprise you, some of the people I know who have been treated unfairly by the police because of their sexual orientation. Race and economic factors too. Ever had to worry about the cops coming in the middle of the night, or while you're gone, to burn or otherwise destroy your boat or any of the homes you've lived in?
Nope.
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:12pm.The San Diego Harbor Police were pretty out of control, but not a problem to anyone who followed even the most basic law.
So again, please cite examples in Olympia of cops violating folks civil rights based on sexual orientation or color. I assume complaints were made to the FBI?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
It's not business to out people.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:22pm.Of course
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:31pm.I don't want you to out anyone who hasn't gone public about it. I just expected that all these grievous insults to person and property would have been met with something other than silence.
Here is how I see it. If you will not take legal steps to prevent abuse of power then you have nothing to bitch about. Every single time I have felt my rights have been violated or police are acting unjustly I made myself heard. Really had a problem twice. Once in San Diego, and very shortly the SDHPD left me alone, the Chief and at least one Port Commissioner knew me by sight and first name. Oh, I was working minimum wage at the time too if I was working.
Second time has been my open carry issues with the OPD.
If rights have been violated I have always found my best protection has been screaming about them at the top of my lungs to any who would listen. Makes it very hard to retaliate when the issue has been so publicly laid bare. Too much evidence at that point to claim retaliation and harassment.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
That right there is an example of your privilige.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:49pm.San Diego
Submitted by security_six on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:58pm.Don't try to be a livaboard boater in San Diego, especially a poor one. When Iwas there, there was still a free long term anchorage. Pass a basic safety inspection and you could stay out there indefinetly as long as you kept up the safety and seaworthiness of the boat. The Port of San Diego, backed by marina operators, and yacht clubs worked hard to vilify those of us out in Anchorage 8. There were a handful of bad apples, tweakers and the like, and more than a few derilict vessels due to very lax enforcement of rules. The seemingly deliberate inactions of the Port allowing A-8 to fall into shambles was used as excuse to get rid of the "trash" and "rabble". Just as a nice shiny new marina was going in a mile away. One person said the marina tenants didn't want to have to look at a bunch of people anchored out and not paying anything.
Oh did we get hassled. Anything and everything the Port could throw at us. Lies, half truths anything.
I don't have the inclination to compress two years of my work into a single topic. When it became plain they were going to eliminate A-8 (I was already planning to leave anyway) I started putting up a fight. I went to meetings and demanded additional mooring balls be put in and A-8ers be given priority on them. That the Port buy out boats of people unable to get any other place. I wasn't the only one doing this but I was one of them. When I left they had decided to put in more balls, but not buy out anyone unable to get a slip or mooring ball.
They wound up buying out boats at the end, for very good sums of money.
Here is an article I was interviewed in.
Homeless people in San Diego were more "empowered" than those of us in A-8.
Everyone is empowered if they wish to be.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
And where does this happen Rob??
Submitted by JT on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 4:31pm."Your fight with OPD, which focuses on your already legally mandated right to carry a gun, isn't equal to a gay person who comes out and gets pulled over by the police every day, or the young person who gets his skateboard broken, or my friend who sometimes gets stopped for being "black in public", as he puts it."
No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits. Climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world ever.Christine Stewart (the real basis for the AGW scare)
Sadly, right here in Olympia.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:02pm.Can you provide proof?
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:07pm.Without proof this is just hearsay and not fodder for CJ. It is possible to describe incidents with enough detail while still protecting the alleged victim's privacy.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
I don't have permission to tell their stories.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:14pm.Then give some inkling of info
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:18pm.Year it happend, officer(s) involved, alleged offenses, anything. Otherwise you are simply posting rumors and heresay. Otherwise I expect you will back down from your stance of demanding cites and criticizing posts or links that don't have enough info or cites to suit you.
Or don't bring them up since they are unprovable. If you read today' Olympian about the witness account of the TESC riot, I heard that story straight from the witness the morning of the riot. I didn't have her permission to tell it, so I simply refrained from mentioning it. I encouraged her to call Jeremy Palowski or come here to Olyblog and tell it.
The point I am making is that without permission to recount the story simply saying you know of something just doesn't cut it.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Do your own homework
Submitted by wildleaf on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:30pm.Dude, this happens all the time. If you are black in this town, or any town in this country, you are more likely to get hassled by the cops. Why don't you ask a black or minority friend of yours? Every black person can tell you a list of stories where the cops harassed them for being Black In Public.
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
Prove it.
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:36pm.Show me that the OPD stops more minorities for unfounded cause than other people and that it is simply for being a minority.
The only so-called "minorities" I know you would probably consider too high up the social ladder to be a valid source.
So far all I hear are generalizations. Remember, I'm asking about Oly here. I don't want stories from Kalifornia or some other backwards state. Olympia. Olympia LEO's.
Come on guys, I've got an open mind on this, I don't have very many friends with the OPD. JT and I see eye to eye on most subjects and that is pretty much it for me and OPD.
Sell me.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Rick needs to take a step back here
Submitted by Norm on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:13pm.S6: That's really not for you to decide.
Submitted by Rick on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 7:36pm.The commitment to intellectual honesty on OlyBlog, agreed to by all and encoded in the Social Contract, holds us all to a high standard in providing substantive and detailed support for claims made on the blog. However, there are obviously special circumstances that may make it difficult to adhere to that high standard. That doesn't mean that the information is worthless, a rumor, or not worth contributing. It just means that there is no verifiable source to attach to it.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
What's not for me to decide?
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:19pm.That I find information utterly and completely without value because of a lack of even a single fact? I can spout of claims like this all day long too if I want. However if it is going to be held up as "proof" that OPD engages in a particular type of illegal behavior, it better have a lot more behind it than "Well it happens" or "You know that sort of thing happens." But if hearsay is okay for Olyblog I'll cut back on my standards of informatin.
Rob is getting it especially hard because he trys to hold others to a high standard of information accountability.
BTW, I saw Bigfoot up in the capital forest.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
BS!
Submitted by Norm on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:23pm.Who won?
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:25pm."Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
For all, or just for Rob?
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:25pm.“I said it in Hebrew—I said it in Dutch—I said it in German and Greek: But I wholly forgot (and it vexes me much) That English is what you speak!”
The Hunting of the Snark
What I'm really looking for
Submitted by security_six on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:32pm.Is proof this is a regular actvity. Not isolated incidents, but regular and common as claimed and implied.
if The Olympian reported like this everyone would be upset, but it's okay on Olyblog and for Rob?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
What change are they trying
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 5:12pm."We aren't going to let you win this time. You will not take one of us today."
Why is that right? I guess we should just give them a free pass. Give them full immunity, they can't ever do wrong. Blame the system whenever something fails.
I guess we learned from OJ that it's even alright for them to kill white people because sometimes white cops are insensitive.
It was also a group of people that have studied or seen first hand the way police control The People with violence in order to protect capital.
Baloney. I am part of The People too. Or are we going to fall back on the "white people don't count" argument? It was just a bunch of punks either looking for an excuse or getting caught up in the heat of the mob.
As a community, I believe it is in our best interests to start a conversation about the police and how they do their jobs.
It's only criminals and their enablers who feel the police are out of control. Why not, as a community, it's not in our best interests to start a conversation about the criminals and how they feel entitled?
If we want to live in the kind of society we dream of, with real freedom, and real access to community, we have to come together and support one another
I already live in that society, thank you. Oh, that's right, I'm white and my parents have been married for almost 40 years.
We can't criticize each other and bicker because that only does our "enemy's" job for them.
The cops are only the enemy of the criminal. Black or white, rich or poor.
Everybody is needed, every idea is valuable....
Remember that if you counter this.
If you disagree with me, then I wasn't talking to you.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 5:59pm.I appreciate the wish for
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 8:47am.“I said it in Hebrew—I said it in Dutch—I said it in German and Greek: But I wholly forgot (and it vexes me much) That English is what you speak!”
The Hunting of the Snark
No, really, nothing personal,
Submitted by Rob Richards on Tue, 02/19/2008 - 12:32pm.Huh?
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:05pm."It's only criminals and their enablers who feel the police are out of control."
I hope you are only speaking in relation to the recent events at Evergreen. Because I have misgivings about the behavior of our police force on a few occassions during the last round of port protests. I had no probelm when the police enforced the laws by arresting the women who were blocking the street or their reaction to outbreaks of violence. But I have serious problems with the level of force they used on some other passive protesters. We clearly do not agree on whether or not any police actions constituted excessive use of force that week, but I hope you are not characterizing my concerns about the 4th and 14th ammendments as "enabling." Since you are a reasonably fair person, I can only imagine you are speaking about the most recent events.
Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
White male bashing is through the roof in this stae...
Submitted by wildleaf on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 5:46pm.The lack of consciousness about the benefits provided by being a white male in this society is disturbing. There is a mistaken sense of entitlement and that we have worked to get where we are in this community. We have worked to get where we are compared to white males from a similar economic and cultural class, but our advantage over minorities and women are astounding and based upon no qualitative value.
If you are happy with how things are right now it is because the scope of your vision and empathy doesn't much leave your living room. You must also have little imagination for what possibilities of a better world exist.
Wake up. This is a wake up call for you and others like you who sit comfortably while many suffer. Those many will start causing you problems unless changes happen. If you want those changes to be a more tolitarian system then expect more problems. If you want changes towards a more just equitable society then watch those changes make these events go away.
I'm going to post an e-mail on my blog I sent out a while ago about some facts on prisons. Look for it.
Well done.
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 02/18/2008 - 6:05pm.