User login

Who's online

There are currently 11 users and 110 guests online.

Online users

  • Meta Hogan
  • SMASH
  • Berd
  • oldtimeydave
  • Just another voice
  • Guglielmo
  • Spareshoes
  • Ehver Green
  • Katherine
  • waterbucks

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • Josopler
  • jasonla
  • Jododp
  • Jfodfie
  • GregDiablo

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 11/25/2007 - 2:10pm.
I have some serious reservations about a few of his views (the border wall being the one that stands out the most), but I also agree with the writers of this article, that someone like Paul, in a way, is what this country needs. I agree with Paul on way more things than I disagree with him on, that's for sure. This article is from the Washington Post, Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch are editors at Reason magazine (reason.com).

lib•er•tar•ian n.
1. a person who believes in the doctrine of the freedom of the will
2. a person who believes in full individual freedom of thought, expression and action
3. a freewheeling rebel who hates wiretaps, loves Ron Paul and is redirecting politics.

By Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch
Sunday, November 25, 2007; Page B01

 

How to make sense of the Ron Paul revolution? What's behind the improbably successful (so far) presidential campaign of a 72-year-old 10-term Republican congressman from Texas who pines for the gold standard while drawing praise from another relic from the hyperinflationary 1970s, punk-rocker Johnny Rotten?

Now with about 5 percent (and climbing) support in polls of likely Republican voters, Paul set a one-day GOP record by raising $4.3 million on the Internet from 38,000 donors on Nov. 5 -- Guy Fawkes Day, the commemoration of a British anarchist who plotted to blow up Parliament and kill King James I in 1605. Paul's campaign, which is three-quarters of the way to its goal of raising "$12 Million to Win" by Dec. 31, didn't even organize the fundraiser -- an independent-minded supporter did.

  
READ MORE HERE
»

More on Ron Paul

Orcinus has a lot of info on Ron Paul, including Man of the Hour
»

Very

»

Don't care at all for his isolationist tendencies

Nor for his stands on reproductive freedom, tax equity, regulation of commerce, and especially the environment. While some of his stands are very attractive in isolation, they arise out of his faith in a laissez-faire government, which colors every other policy stance he makes.
»

and he's not nearly as fun as Jesse Ventura

either.
»

I'm pulling for him

n/t
»

He's a friend of the Nazis,

He's a friend of the Nazis, I would think that'd be all we'd need to know.

Please give me a second grace. Please give me a second face. I've fallen far down, the first time around, now I just sit on the ground in your way.
Nick Drake

»

Are you trying to kill this thread

using Godwin's Law?
»

Dr. Paul

is a fascinating fellow. I have been watching him for years. Some of his views don't seem libertarian to me at all, but he does seem to do a better job of walking his talk than most other candidates from both major parties. I predict he'll drop the Republican Party and run as an independent (too late for him to grab the Libertarian nomination, like he did in 1988). I enjoy his presence at the debates. He is the ghost of Republican past, reminding the others how far that party has strayed from being the party of fiscal responsibility and less government. It is fitting he was recently endorsed by Barry Goldwater Jr. I also think the Republicans will try to strike some deal to keep him off the ballot. He could be a spoiler, pulling a Perot and making sure a Dem wins in 2008.

It would be tempting for true libertarians of both Left and Right to support Dr. Paul, but there is, as Sarah has noted, a real red flag here among his supporters. The Nazis love him. And you have to ask yourself, why? Considering their fascist and racist agenda, what is there in Paul's message that makes them so enthusiastic? Is it the immigration thing? And why has he not turned back their support in a public statement? I'm disappointed in him for sitting on his hands about this, but maybe he's said something and I missed it. In this case we can waive Godwin's Law. It isn't a question of theory or mudslinging. What do you guys think?

He certainly is a guy to watch in the coming election year and he seems to be providing a voice for a lot of angry people. I sometimes think my late father, who was a Goldwater Republican, would be a Paul supporter today.

But I can't really concern myself with this. I have another Presidential campaign to contend with and I can only handle one at a time.

»

I didn't realize

there was real support from the NAZIs. I withdraw my Godwin's Law claim.
»

I don't see how

Freewill and anti-choice can be in the same philosophy

»

Can you clarify what you're

Can you clarify what you're asking?
»

I want to preface this by

I want to preface this by saying I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul with Norm's pencil, but I do think he is a really interesting figure in America right now, definitely one to watch.

He doesn't agree with abortions, but wouldn't ban them either, same with gay marriage. He's a strong proponent of states' rights in matters like those. Returning to the gold standard, and wanting to do away with IRS are all really know about his economic positions, so if you want to clarify what exactly you disagree with him about that would be helpful.

He also wants to end American imperialism by removing our troops from not only Iraq and Afghanistan, but other forward deployed positions as well.

I look at Clinton and Giuliani and I don't see a whole hell of a lot of difference. In both cases I see government getting bigger and bigger, with more control over my day to day life. That doesn't appeal to me at all. I want less big government and more local government, like no bigger than neighborhood associations. At least Paul would give power back to the states, where it could be decided on a smaller level. Spontaneous geographic ideological segregation happens naturally as it is. We're never going to come to a consensus about something like abortion or immigration as an entire nation, so why not let states decide for themselves?

I wouldn't call Paul a "friend of the Nazi's". I would say that his views on immigration give room for Nazi's to spew their hate.

»

Some things I don't like about his economic policies are

  • He has no interest in tax equity (all tax cuts are good in his view);
  • Similarly, he has no interest in income redistribution;
  • His approach to business and environmental regulation is, that less is better or just leave it to the states;
  • His approach to health care reform is to free the health care industry from government constraints;
  • He eschews international trade agreements of any kind; and
  • He thinks states should be responsible for environmental regulation, not national or international agencies.
»

Que?

I'm not even in this thread (till now) how the heck did my pencil end up being mentioned???
»

Unless I've been provided the wrong information...

Ron Paul is opposed to women's right to choose as a legal issue.

From Paul's website:

The right of an innocent, unborn child to life is at the heart of the American ideals of liberty. My professional and legislative record demonstrates my strong commitment to this pro-life principle.

In 40 years of medical practice, I never once considered performing an abortion, nor did I ever find abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.

In Congress, I have authored legislation that seeks to define life as beginning at conception, HR 1094.

I am also the prime sponsor of HR 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life. This is a practical, direct approach to ending federal court tyranny which threatens our constitutional republic and has caused the deaths of 45 million of the unborn.

By the way, Barry Goldwater was absolutely opposed to the government having any say in women's healthcare choices.  He believed that the government should never intrude on matters of personal privacy.

»

Yeah, I read that off his

Yeah, I read that off his website also, not a good mark for him at all.
»

Interesting this was posted

Interesting this thread was posted today. Matt Drudge is running a large picture of Patrick Buchanan's new book, Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed are Tearing America Apart with the headline "Book Declares 'End of America'"

The U.S. Army is breaking and is too small to meet America’s global commitments.

The greatest invasion in history, from the Third World, is swamping the ethno-cultural core of the country, leading to Balkanization and the loss of the Southwest to Mexico.

The culture is collapsing and the nation is being deconstructed along the lines of race and class.

Pax Americana, the era of U.S. global dominance, is over. A struggle for global hegemony has begun among the United States, China, a resurgent Russia and radical Islam

Buchanan's solutions?

A new foreign-defense policy that closes most of the 1000 bases overseas, reviews all alliances, and brings home U.S. troops

To prevent America becoming “a tangle of squabbling nationalities” Buchanan urges: No amnesty for the 12-20 million illegal aliens; a border fence from San Diego to Brownsville; Congressional declarations that children born to illegal aliens are not citizens and English is the language of the United States; and a “timeout” on all immigration.

I think the part about "the nation..being deconstructed along the lines of race and class" is interesting, especially when people taking to the street are declaring that Americans should "fight the rich, not their wars."

»

Buchanan is interesting.

Buchanan goes into this a bit on a recent episode of The McLaughlin Group, where he asserts that it's not the "end of America", but, basically the end of America as we know it ("as we know it" being the key words there), and believes we are definitely facing the end of America as the only super power.
»

Until a couple of months ago

Until a couple of months ago ~ I thought it was RuPaul!   Even now when I see the signs for him, for a split second, I see RuPaul for America.

Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. ~Ludwig van Beethoven

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Latest Classified Ads

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter