User login

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 29 guests online.

Online users

  • Rob Richards

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • systematist
  • itsthewater
  • tsunamizombie
  • Brooks
  • Teresa Marie Staal

Poster Calendar

July

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sat, 03/01/2008 - 2:38pm.
[via email:]
Thursday, February 28, 2008

This is the statement that Jeff wrote and read to the Judge this morning

Jeffrey (Free) Luers Resentencing Hearing, Feb. 28, 2008

Statement of Jeffrey Luers to Judge Billings at Sentencing

It has been many years since I first stood in court to be sentenced for these actions. I now not only have the benefit of hindsight but also possess the knowledge and understanding that comes from leaving the naiveté of youth behind.

I can now say with all honesty that I was wrong to think that arson would inspire social change. But, my failure in understanding that does not mean I have changed my opinion of radical activism.

Mr. Hassleman has a written statement from me in which I have acknowledged being wrong. I have also committed to living the life of a law-abiding citizen and promoting my activism through legal means and channels. Understandably, the prosecutor has expressed some skepticism of my sincerity. I wish to lay those fears to rest.

I am truly excited about my future. Through the love and support of my family, friends and many people I do not even know, I have numerous options available to me. I am looking forward to furthering my education, and pursuing my goals through hard work. I am ready to share my life with my loved ones and I am dedicated to giving back to the community that has shown me so much love and support through these years of imprisonment. That is not the lip service the prosecutor may fear, but my sincere desire to move on with my life.

However, choosing to take a new path and recognizing my mistakes and failures does not make me ashamed of them. I am sorry if my actions instilled fear or the sense of victimization in the Romania family. That was never my intent.

I sought to promote change through radical struggle. I viewed the refusal of our government and corporate institutions to address the issues and dire consequences of global warming as legitimate reasons for direct action. I still believe that government and corporate inaction is a legitimate reason for direct action. Yet, I recognize that militant struggle has failed to create widespread social change for many reasons. And I'm not sure if it is even capable of creating the change we desperately need.

We are witnessing a mass extinction event taking place in our life times. The world's top scientists are warning that by the middle of this century, 30 to 50 percent of all living species could be extinct. There are predictions of 250 million people, or more, dying for lack of water and food. Fears that melting glaciers in Alaska and Greenland could catastrophically raise global sea levels. While here at home our leading climate scientists have been censored by our government. Their reports edited by Bush appointees who now work for some of Americas biggest oil companies. We have been deceived by the very people responsible for our well-being.

Fortunately, the veil has been lifted and many Americans are now demanding that action be taken on climate change and other environmental issues. Indeed many states are now confronting our federal government on the topic. However, so far all legislative attempts to solve the problem have failed or have lacked the necessary backbone to accomplish anything meaningful. The time for change has to be now. We no longer have the luxury of passing our problems off to the next generation. We must be vigilant in our determination to create change and find solutions to what is arguably the greatest threat humanity has ever faced. It is the people in this courtroom, the citizens of this country, this state and this country that must carry the responsibility for creating change. For if we can't change our own lives how can we expect others to change theirs?

I'm ready and willing to change so that I can help find real solutions to our problems. I'm ready to help find methods that aren't limited to rhetoric. Doomed to failure by symbolism or rendered meaningless by corruption. I choose to take a new direction because not only is a new path sorely needed in my own life, but a new direction is sorely needed by our country. I recognize that if I'm not helping to create that change, I'm just standing in the way. We are all in this together whether we are labeled radical, conservative or liberal. And together is the only way we are going to solve this problem.

It is easy for me to say these things. I doubt that my commitment to the environment or social change has ever been questioned. However, I am sure the court as well as many others, question whether or not I have truly left my militant past behind. To which all I can say is that I am ready to live my life. I'm ready to put the needs of my family first. And I'm also ready to find success where thus far radical struggle has failed. More than anything, I am just ready to move on."

------------------------

To which Judge J.A. Billings responded that he has been a lawyer and a judge for 35 years and he has never received a statement from a defendant of such high quality. "I'm very impressed with you. I have no hesitation in accepting this sentence. I wish you only the best."

-------------------

2/28/08 Statement of Jeffrey Luers After Sentencing Hearing

Today I feel a great weight lifted off of me, and my loved ones. While I believe my new sentence is still more of a reflection of my activism and my dissent than my actual crimes; I am looking forward to my much closer release date.

I continue to stand by my actions and have no regrets about my choices. These last several years in prison have not deterred me from speaking my mind, following my heart or standing up against oppression and injustice.

I am proud of the many things I have accomplished while incarcerated, including reaching beyond oceans and borders to help raise awareness about global warming and to help combat social injustice.

I am thankful to my family, friends and the thousands of supporters and fellow activists from around the world who have stood by me since day one. And I'd especially like to thank my attorneys, and friends. Lauren Regan, Misha Dunlap and Shawn Wiley for never giving up on getting me out sooner than 22 years.

I am happy to say this journey is almost over and I'll be coming home soon.
»

What did Mr. Luers do and

What did Mr. Luers do and what was he convicted of?
»

Luers

[wikipedia]

Jeff "Free" Luers is an environmental activist from Los Angeles, California, currently serving a twenty-two year prison sentence for arson. Recently, on February 14, 2007, The Court of Appeals ruled that Jeff Luers' sentence will be revisited, with a possible 15 years taken off the original sentencing.[18] In 2000 he set fire to three SUVs at Romania Chevrolet dealership in Eugene, Oregon as a protest against excessive consumption and global warming along with Craig Marshall, who was sentenced to five and a half years in prison (Luers might have received a similar sentence if he had not been convicted of an earlier attempted arson as well).[19] Supporters argue that he is a political prisoner, due to his abnormally long sentence; they point out that sentences for arson and even crimes such as rape are generally much shorter, and that Luers was not intentionally endangering any human being, only destroying property in an act of direct action. Opponents argue that this act constituted eco-terrorism, there could easily have been loss of life due to the unpredictable nature of arson, and Luers's complete lack of remorse, along with an apparent willingness to perpetuate further "violent" acts, make him a risk to society.[20]

He is a former resident of Eugene, Oregon and helped establish Red Cloud Thunder, a group of activists who organized a campaign to stop the thinning and clear-cutting of old growth forests outside of Fall Creek, Oregon.

He has become a cause célèbre among some radicals, anti-prison activists, and people associated with the Earth Liberation Front, although Luers has said that he does not consider himself an ELF member. [21]

Each year since his imprisonment, there has been some call to action in his support around the anniversary of his sentencing. On June 12, 2004, there were demonstrations in several places in the United States, along with events in other countries.[citation needed] There were also a number of concerts, video showings, and dinners to raise support for Luers. In Moscow, supporters spray painted "Free Jeff Luers!" on a wall outside of the American Embassy. The FBI issued a warning to various businesses and media outlets that acts of eco-terrorism might occur around this date. No such actions occurred, and activists claimed that the FBI was using scare tactics to intimidate its opponents. A similar "Weekend of Resistance" took place June 10-12, 2005, with events occurring worldwide.[22]

»

Arson

He was convicted of setting fire to three SUVs at a dealership in Eugene. Apparently, two of the three SUVs were not sufficiently damaged to prevent them from being sold subsequently.
»

Can I ask why that

Can I ask why that matters?  A crime is a crime.  It had nothing to do with the numbers, cars or money.  It had to do with his pattern of being arrested for arson and ELF related shenanigans.

His partner in crime pled out at 5.5 years and Jeff got 22.5 years.  Seems a bit harsh to me given the plea deal.  I do believe he was tried in part for his past behavior, which he should not have been, but 7-10 is fair.

»

So do you think he should be released now?

Based on the time he's served already and his statement?

image
»

I think his sentence should

I think his sentence should be reviewed.  If he's served 7 and been a model prisoner, then yes, I think he sould be released with a nice long probation.
»

A crime is a crime?

Then why do we distinguish between petty and grand larceny? Why are the penalties for attempted murder less than murder? The extent of damage does, and should, matter.
»

Arson is arson.  That

Arson is arson.  That better?  I'm not comparing degrees of crime here.  If it was one or 15 SUVs, it's still Arson I in Oregon law 1.  If a threat of serious physical injury exists, arson is one level below murder with a Crime Category of 10.  It can also be a 9, 8, or 7.


1. Oregon Criminal Justice Commision - Crime Seriousness Scale, Oregon Secretary of State 
»

Luers Quote

I like this Luers quote too:

Luers describes the motivation for his act:

“In an act of resistance designated to raise awareness and draw attention to a problem that affects every human being, every animal, every plant, and every form of life on this planet. I am speaking of global warming, air, soil and water pollution. We are in the midst of a global environmental crisis.

"It is my belief that the oppression of people is rooted in the oppression and exploitation of nature. A fundamental disrespect for life that began with the conquest of Mother Nature and has led to the conquest of humankind."

[wikipedia]

»

That's Fine

He can discuss his motivations all he wants.  Setting fire to 3 SUVs is not the answer.  In fact, he spew a bit of uncessary carbon into the air by starting the fire.
»

Arson not the answer

I agree with you. Luers addressed this in the original posted statement above. I totally agree with the judge too, a very eloquent statement.
»

We need this type of

We need this type of discetion on our legal system.  Gug's been talking about it for a week now and I agree with him on every minimum sentencing fact.
»

Weren't they Hummers?

For years I had this fantasy, which for the record is and shall always remain a fantasy, of stealing hummers and burning them in a public square until someone of the distaff persuasion pointed out to me burning one of those monstrosities would create a whole bunch of toxic fumes. Alas she was right. For my own personal development and in light of my professed allegiance to peace and justice I should have dreamed of chopping the top of my imaginary purloined machines and turn them into mobile flower beds. Bully for Mr. Luers for putting his beliefs in action. I think it's pretty damned clear his sentence reflects corporate fear of rebels with a cause than the true consequences of Mr. Luers's actions.
»

I understand his reasoning

and obviously he's come to the same conclusion I have, that setting fire to SUV's is not the right answer. Is 7 years enough? Because of the intimidation factor I think he could sit around for another 8 or so. If he's been a model prisoner maybe a parole hearing after 10 years might be appropriate. I'd feel the same way if he intentionally set fire to an unattended house, or a forest. I really don't like fire.
»

What is the point of prison?

If at 7 years he has learned his lesson and is going to get out and continue his life in a lawful manner, then why should he rot for 3 more years?

So is the point of prison simple punishment, whatever the judge deems fit, or is it to reform people so that they don't need to break the law anymore?

image
»

Depends on the philosophy

Throughout history it has been a back and forth.....rehabilitation.....then punishment....then rehabilitation...etc. I prefer the punishment model myself.
»

Count me for the...

...rebirth solution.

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Olyblogger of the Month:

decorabilia

Sponsored by:

Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are:

Rob Richards
Interests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism.

emmettoconnell
Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum.

enpen
Interests: OlyBlog poster calendar, Olympia public art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff.

Robert Whitlock
Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment

Rick
Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons.

Get Firefox!

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter