|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 49 guests online.
Online users
|
Submitted by Sandy M on Sat, 11/14/2009 - 1:44pm.
This is to announce that several Olympia Single Payer Action (OSPA)
members will attend an annual statewide meeting of single-payer activists in
Seattle tomorrow.
» Health Care for All – Washington: Annual Membership Meeting Sunday, November 15, 1-4 PM Horizon House, 900 University St Seattle There will be a carpool leaving from the Artesian Well in downtown Olympia at 11:45 AM. (More details provided at the end of this message.) This is an incredibly important moment in the single-payer movement both locally and nationally. Locally and regionally, as stated previously by Peter Bohmer, our primary task is to “build a powerful movement for health care as a human right for all,” which will be the focus of tomorrow's meeting in Seattle. Nationally, Healthcare-NOW is holding a national strategy conference in St. Louis this weekend with that same goal in mind. Read their statement below in response to the health care bill just passed in the House. Watch for announcements about upcoming OSPA meetings. No doubt there will be plenty to talk about after tomorrow’s gathering in Seattle. Toward affordable quality health care for all! -Sandy ### http://www.healthcare-now.org/ Healthcare-NOW Statement on HR 3962Posted on November 13, 2009On Saturday, November 7, 2009, the House passed H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, to much celebration by the Democratic party. Healthcare-NOW!’s view, however, is that the House bill is a gift to the insurance industry at the further expense of the people of this nation. The bill’s advocates claim it will cover an additional 36 million people, subsidize the cost of insurance for families up to 400% above the poverty level, increase Medicaid coverage to 150% above the poverty level, close the Medicare donut hole by 2019, place a surcharge on individuals making more than $500,000 and couples making more than $1,000,000, will end rescissions and pre-existing conditions. What the Democrats fail to mention is the bill leaves millions of people uninsured, allows medical bankruptcies to persist, criminalizes and fines the uninsured, increases the number of underinsured, does nothing to contain the sky rocketing costs, blocks women from their reproductive rights, transfers massive public funds to private insurance companies strengthening their control over care, protects pharmaceutical companies’ superprofits at patient expense, fails to reclaim the 31% of waste in our system, expands Medicaid without regard to the state budget crises, discriminates based on immigration status and age, and sets up several levels of care covering less for those without the ability to pay. Those who have coverage will increasingly find care unaffordable and will go without. The whole system will inevitably fail from being fiscally unsustainable. So is the House bill better than nothing? “I don’t think so,” writes Marcia Angell, M.D., former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. “It simply throws more money into a dysfunctional and unsustainable system, with only a few improvements at the edges, and it augments the central role of the investor-owned insurance industry. The danger is that as costs continue to rise and coverage becomes less comprehensive, people will conclude that we’ve tried health reform and it didn’t work. But the real problem will be that we didn’t really try it. I would rather see us do nothing now, and have a better chance of trying again later and then doing it right.” Given that the bill does nothing to contain or reduce rising costs or end the private health insurance industry’s dominance, we hoped that the Progressive Caucus would stand strong. But they did not. All but two of H.R. 676’s cosponsors voted for H.R. 3962 — Rep. Eric Massa [D-NY] and Rep. Kucinich [D-OH]. Rep. Massa stated, “At the highest level, this bill will enshrine in law the monopolistic powers of the private health insurance industry, period. There’s really no other way to look at it.” Despite telling single-payer advocates that Congressman Weiner’s single-payer amendment could not go to vote because it would open the floodgates for regressive amendments on abortion and immigrant access, the Democratic leadership allowed votes on both. Prior to the vote on H.R. 3962, the Stupak Amendment passed that will prevent women receiving tax subsidies from using their own money to purchase private insurance that covers abortion and in many cases will prevent low-income women from accessing abortion entirely. “The House of Representatives has dealt the worst blow to women’s fundamental right to self-determination in order to buy a few votes for reform of the profit-driven health insurance industry,” writes Terry O’Neill, President of National Organization for Women. “We must protect the rights we fought for in Roe v. Wade. We cannot and will not support a health care bill that strips millions of women of their existing access to abortion.” Healthcare-NOW! fought to win a fair and open debate on healthcare reform including the merits of a single-payer system. This has not yet happened, but the advocacy for this system has greatly impacted the debate in meaningful ways. We need to continue to build the grassroots movement for single-payer, not-for-profit, national healthcare. We look forward to much brain-storming at our upcoming national strategy conference in St. Louis this weekend, and the opportunity to move forward with renewed energy, creative ideas, and resolve. Meanwhile, we have the opportunity NOW to continue to support the Sanders’ Single-Payer Amendment to be introduced in the U.S. Senate, Congressman Kucinich’s efforts to get the state single-payer amendment back in when the House and Senate bills are reconciled, and the efforts of the Mobilization for Health Care for All. Thanks for all that you do, Healthcare-NOW! National Staff and Steering Committee ### Annual statewide meeting of single-payer activists in Seattle on Sunday: Health Care for All – Washington: Annual Membership Meeting Sunday, November 15, 2009 1-4 PM Horizon House, 900 University St Seattle Agenda 1:00- 1:30 Potluck lunch and networking. 1:30 - 2:15 Business Meeting, including elections 2:15 - 3.30 Program Meeting: - National Health Care Reform Gone Sour" - Larry Kalb, President - State Health Care Reform Prospects - Presentation of 2009 Actions - multi-media presentations 3:30 - 4 pm Small Group Sessions: - "How do other rich nations cover everyone at half the cost! - Dr. Sarah Weinberg - "What does a state Single Payer plan look like?" - Dr. Bob Fithian - Action Teams and HCFA chapters - poster talks - Action Projects: Speaker's Bureau, Street Theater, Sit-In's, and Lobbying New and old members, and interested friends all welcome. ### There is a carpool leaving from the Artesian Well in downtown Olympia at 11:45 AM. Please arrive by 11:30. The Artesian Well is located in the Diamond Parking lot on 4th Avenue between Adams and Jefferson Streets. This meeting begins with a pot-luck lunch so bring an item to share if you can.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
John Geyman Article
Submitted by Berd on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 8:42pm.This is applicable to past debate that has occurred on OlyBlog over whether the current legislation that just passed the in the House is better, or worse, than no change.
I also received an email from Joe Vogel, director of the DCCC, who wrote, "On November 7, 2009, the House of Representatives made history by passing the Affordable Health Care for America Act to deliver on the promise of affordable health insurance for the middle class."
Which leads me to ask, what about poor people. Don't poor people deserve health care too?
I was notified of the John Geyman article by Rabbi Michael Lerner of Tikkun, who wrote in an email of the concern that the House Bill includes "a hard-line anti-choice provision."
Here's the beginning of the Geyman article with a link to read the rest:
More Recent Article, by Marcia Angell
Submitted by Berd on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 8:47pm.Here's an excerpt from and a link to a more recent article, by Marcia Angell, this might be the one that Rabbi Lerner was referring to - I think the above analysis is actually intended to apply to this article, not the older Geyman article:
More of the Angell Article:
Submitted by Berd on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 8:53pm.This is powerful stuff:
Conservative rhetoric notwithstanding, the House bill is not a "government takeover." I wish it were. Instead, it enshrines and subsidizes the "takeover" by the investor-owned insurance industry that occurred after the failure of the Clinton reform effort in 1994. To be sure, the bill has a few good provisions (expansion of Medicaid, for example), but they are marginal. It also provides for some regulation of the industry (no denial of coverage because of pre-existing conditions, for example), but since it doesn't regulate premiums, the industry can respond to any regulation that threatens its profits by simply raising its rates. The bill also does very little to curb the perverse incentives that lead doctors to over-treat the well-insured. And quite apart from its content, the bill is so complicated and convoluted that it would take a staggering apparatus to administer it and try to enforce its regulations.