|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 63 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Vita OShea on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 11:47am.
John Drebick bought the downtown Safeway property for $2 million and the property next door for $650,000. He is asking the city to buy these properties for $3.3 million plus two thirds of one percent for each month that passes without closing. He’s giving the city until September 24th to make a decision before marketing to others and intends to sell the property no later than November 1st. He also demands a non-refundable $200,000 deposit. Drebick now owns a block of downtown which could be utilized for purposes other than opening new businesses or hosting a new city hall. The city is contemplating buying the property for the latter. Essentially, we play no part in this decision making process. I suggest we take back the land. It wasn’t Safeway’s. It isn’t Drebick’s. And it doesn’t have to belong to city counsel either. The property belongs to all of us. We now have a unique opportunity to reclaim a small piece of what has been taken from and sold or rented back to us. What we need is a clear assertion of our right to a downtown which is progressively being sold to developers, businesses, and the upper-class. We deserve a downtown that is our own. A space which is not owned by those who will continue to impose their bougie beliefs and ways of living on us. These people continue to make Olympia uninhabitable and inaccessible, especially for those of us who have no other place to live, sit, rest. So, what can be done? How can we take back our town? And what should we do with that space? It’s up to us to decide. Any input is welcome.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Two options exist as I see
Submitted by Ehver Green on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 12:05pm.Two options exist as I see it...
1) Buy the land. That's a large sum of cash, though. It would take a monster effort to raise that kind of money while keeping all investors happy with the direction of the property.
2) Condemn the land through eminent domain. We all saw the backlash this created with the property near the Boulevard extension. The key here is the property must benefit the public as a whole (generally reserved for highways, railways, etc). Most of the time fair market value is offered as a way to reduce the backlash, but property owners aren't always willing to sell.
You seem to have made a mistake in your post. Mr. Roberts *did* own the property. Drebick *does* own the property. I'm curious to understand why you believe differently. If it's a moral objection, I understand, but it doesn't change the facts.
Buying it actually would be taking it back
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:18pm.Agreed. But I could see
Submitted by Ehver Green on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:40pm.Ehver is right
Submitted by vincent_vega on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:19pm.Well, when you go back 150
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:24pm.But we have treaties!
Submitted by Ehver Green on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:42pm.Exactly my point.
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 1:53pm.Is it me, or was this person
Submitted by Norm on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 2:20pm.It was vita o'shea
Submitted by Ehver Green on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 2:25pm.