User login

Who's online

There are currently 6 users and 63 guests online.

Online users

  • Daviddec
  • Rick
  • Guglielmo
  • einmaleins
  • sascha
  • Logarithm

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • LongRider
  • non illegitimi ...
  • acreatureapart
  • eristalis
  • Hillguy

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Vita OShea on Thu, 09/06/2007 - 11:47am.

John Drebick bought the downtown Safeway property for $2 million and the property next door for $650,000. He is asking the city to buy these properties for $3.3 million plus two thirds of one percent for each month that passes without closing. He’s giving the city until September 24th to make a decision before marketing to others and intends to sell the property no later than November 1st. He also demands a non-refundable $200,000 deposit. Drebick now owns a block of downtown which could be utilized for purposes other than opening new businesses or hosting a new city hall. The city is contemplating buying the property for the latter. Essentially, we play no part in this decision making process.

I suggest we take back the land. It wasn’t Safeway’s. It isn’t Drebick’s. And it doesn’t have to belong to city counsel either. The property belongs to all of us. We now have a unique opportunity to reclaim a small piece of what has been taken from and sold or rented back to us. What we need is a clear assertion of our right to a downtown which is progressively being sold to developers, businesses, and the upper-class. We deserve a downtown that is our own. A space which is not owned by those who will continue to impose their bougie beliefs and ways of living on us. These people continue to make Olympia uninhabitable and inaccessible, especially for those of us who have no other place to live, sit, rest.

So, what can be done? How can we take back our town? And what should we do with that space?

It’s up to us to decide.

Any input is welcome.

»

Two options exist as I see

Two options exist as I see it...

1)  Buy the land.  That's a large sum of cash, though.  It would take a monster effort to raise that kind of money while keeping all investors happy with the direction of the property.

2) Condemn the land through eminent domain.  We all saw the backlash this created with the property near the Boulevard extension.  The key here is the property must benefit the public as a whole (generally reserved for highways, railways, etc).  Most of the time fair market value is offered as a way to reduce the backlash, but property owners aren't always willing to sell.

You seem to have made a mistake in your post.  Mr. Roberts *did* own the property.  Drebick *does* own the property.  I'm curious to understand why you believe differently.  If it's a moral objection, I understand, but it doesn't change the facts.

»

Buying it actually would be taking it back

In that the city is a democratic institution that acts on our behest, buying the block would be taking it back. I actually like the idea of city hall being there rather than on port property. The only downer is the long-term loss of a downtown business and supermarket.
»

Agreed.  But I could see

Agreed.  But I could see private groups with like interests pooling funds to buy it first.  The hurdle is the dollar figure, of course.
»

Ehver is right

While I do support "taking back land" if it benefits all, I don't see how this is going to happen here. Also, from a business point of view, why should this man not make a little profit. In the end, it wont be a huge amount, in real estate standards. He put up the $$$, is taking the risk, he should get the reward. What were your ideas for the land that would benefit all community memebers? Remember, the land doesn't belong to all of us unless our names are on the deed. I know mine isn't.
»

Well, when you go back 150

Well, when you go back 150 years or so, the land wasn't really "ours" anyway. If someone were to really take it "back," then we'd all be in a different boat.
»

But we have treaties!

But we have treaties!
»

Exactly my point.

Exactly my point.
»

Is it me, or was this person

Is it me, or was this person not "Anonymous" earlier in the day?
»

It was vita o'shea

It was vita o'shea earlier.  The account is gone or disabled.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter