Travelling Outside the Country? Kiss your privacy rights goodbye.

I came across this email from the ACLU and it reminded me of Naomi Wolf's book, The End of America: Letter to a young patriot. In the book, Wolf compares the developing Nazism of 1930s Germany to the Present Day USA. She describes a 10 step blueprint for closing down democracy and shutting down open society. For more information see the publisher's website about the book: http://www.chelseagreen.com/bookstore/item/endofamerica. Also see this YouTube video of a talk given by Wolf at UW Kane Hall: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjALf12PAWc.

Here's the information from ACLU with a link to contact your Representative and Senators in Congress: https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?page=SplashPage&id=1009:

Tell Congress: Rein in DHS Travel Abuses

Planning a vacation? Thinking about traveling outside the country?

If you travel outside the United States, you can kiss your right to privacy, and perhaps your laptop, digital camera and cell phone, goodbye.

With no suspicion and no explanation, the U.S. government can seize your laptop, cell phone, or PDA as you enter the United States and download all your private information -- including your personal and business documents, emails, phone calls, and web history.

And what happens if you refuse to let the agents download your personal photos? Or if you have encrypted your private information? Then Border Patrol -- which is now an agency of the Department of Homeland Security -- can simply copy your entire hard drive or even take your device and hang on to it indefinitely.

Tell Congress: it’s time to rein in travel abuses by the Department of Homeland Security.

Unfortunately, seizing laptops and cameras at the border isn’t the only travel security measure that infringes on our civil liberties.

Just last month, the U.S. government's "terrorist watch list" surpassed 1,000,000 names and is growing by over 20,000 names per month. The watch list includes the names of prominent people, like Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA), plus hundreds of thousands of ordinary Americans many of them with common names like Robert Johnson and James Robinson. Your name might be on the list. But there's no way to know for sure until you are delayed or even detained for hours in a back room. If you discover your name is on the list, it's nearly impossible to get off. It actually took an Act of Congress to get Nelson Mandela off the list. No joke. An Act of Congress.

These abuses have something in common: They make all of us into suspects, with no rule of law and no accountability.

Tell Congress: it’s time to rein in travel abuses by the Department of Homeland Security.

It’s hard to know what surveillance-state bureaucrats will come up with next. For instance, many airports are using scanners that are so invasive that they are like a virtual strip search! See-through body scanning machines are capable of showing an image of a passenger's naked body -- an example can be seen on the right. Security measures like this are extremely intrusive -- and should only be used when there is good cause to suspect that an individual is a security risk.

And recently, the TSA expressed interest in having every traveler wear an "electro-muscular disruption" bracelet that airline personnel or marshals could use to shock passengers into submission. Unless something is done, this plan may not be as far-fetched as one would think.

Traveling shouldn’t mean checking your rights when you’re checking your luggage.  It’s time for some sanity when it comes to security.  Please, speak out now.

 

Comments

Closed Container Argument

I think some background information is needed for this story.

The debate on this topic began a year or so ago when an individual was crossing the US-Canada border and was asked for his computer and agents found child porn on the hard drive.

I think that having an authority download and keep my computer or other electronic devices would be a pretty big invasion of my privacy. But the court made a pretty good argument: your electronic device is just like a closed container. If I am traveling across a border, I need to be ready to have my person and my vehicle searched. That is just the nature of being in our day and age.

And of course, this is an invasion of my privacy. But I haven't read anything that indicates this policy is attached to domestic homeland security. Everything indicates that the policy is for Customs agents and border protection. If I am traveling into or out of a country, I am really at the mercy of whether or not that country wants to let me in or not, and I have to play by their rules. Every day thousands of people are stopped at the border and searched with no probable cause. That is not unreasonable, it is just part of the nature of running a controlled border system. It is an invasion, but it is an invasion that we bring upon ourselves as border hopping travellers.

Attached is the Customs & Border Patrol agent policy on the search of information, here:

http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/travel/admissability/search_authority.ctt/search_authority.pdf 

 

But I am Just Another Voice

But I am Just Another Voice

Bert,

These conditions of (occasionally) unecessary surveillance are largely a result of the unfair trade negotians that were imposed on developing nations by Europe and the US. People like Mendella- who symbolize typical African dedication to fair trade from local farmer to mass buyer (ensuring that all money gets distributed fairly with the exception of diamond and oil areas) ARE a threat to global trade that is controlled by the US and Europe. Thanks for posting your story, Bert. Hopefully it will encourage more citizens who have no interest in helping unfair trade regulations remove money from our economy to remember to leave labtops and cellular telephones at home, and just go overseas for the simple joy of being overseas. As a well seasoned traveller, I have never needed a labtop or mobile phone overseas. Overseas is enough to keep me happy without those luxuries. But your point is valid. If you threaten trade regulations then expect to raise attention of those who watch trade regulations.