|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 9 users and 49 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:09pm.
Here is what has really been bothering me about the recent blowup at OFS (here and here at the Olympian). The board of directors actually isn't elected from the membership. Rather, it is self appointing. The current members of the board choose all new incoming members. From the OFS bylaws, posted up at OFSvolunteers:
Now, here's my question: Would you trust a board that is put together in such a manner? Also, there's a new explainer over at OFSvolunteers called: How did the board fudge the bylaws?
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Olyblogger of the Month: Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are: Rob RichardsInterests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism. emmettoconnell Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum. enpen Interests: OlyBlog calendar, Oly street art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff. Robert Whitlock Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment Rick Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons. Docent email list Latest Classified Ads Books & Collections ›Blog Local Olympia Film Society |
Excellent question
Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:12pm.In addition to question of how new board members get approved, I wonder how many people self-select out of the process because of perceived cronyism or personality conflicts?
A few years ago I was interested in joining the board, but I heard from an insider how difficult a particular board member was to work with, so I never followed through.
Ugh!!!
Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:02pm.Thanks for the new link!
"If the board had not added a fifth member, they would not have been able to take the vote. The board achieved quorum by adding a fifth member who was committed to stand aside before knowing the subject of the vote."
That's really, really icky! Sounds like they all need to learn what consensus means.
This sounds like an organization
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:40pm.Bylaws
Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:52pm.This committee of one,
Submitted by Mary Baker Eddy on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:43pm.I'm debating whether or not I'll bother with the Film Festival. It's always been fun, but not as fun as before. Crispin Glover, Russ Meyer, those were film festivals.
Do I understand correctly
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:11pm.Fuzzy math
Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:24pm.I believe there were 5 established board members, 4 of whom were in attendance at that meeting. There were also 3 prospective new board members in attendance, for a total of 7 board members present (8 total).
However, the established board members asked the 3 new members to stand aside on the vote, without telling them the subject of the vote. In other words, they wanted to count them for the purpose of having a quorum of at least 5, but they dictated that the new members must not vote to block. This is a complete distortion of consensus-based decision making.
When the subject of the vote was revealed, two of the 3 new board members expressed their discomfort and were "removed from the board for the remainder of the meeting." This left one new board member who had agreed to stand aside before even knowing the subject of the vote, plus the four established board members, meeting the quorum of 5.
Somebody please correct me if I've got this wrong, but I'm afraid I haven't.
If your story is right
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:28pm.That's my understanding as well
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:38pm.Meeting Sunday
Submitted by concerned on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 5:59pm.Please Join!
Submitted by Zero_One on Sun, 09/02/2007 - 11:01pm.